Traci Tucker Consultant Traci leverages her 30 years of marketing, operations, and communications experience in her work with credit unions. Prior to her work with Quantum, Traci was the marketing executive at GTE Federal Credit Union, working with the marketing team, executive team, and board to develop and execute successful strategies for growth and member service. She transitioned to the agency world, first as an account executive and head of branding, and then as the vice president of client service, working with clients and overseeing the agency’s team and operations. Traci graduated from Florida Southern College with a B.S. in Business Administration with a concentration in marketing management, and lives in Florida. Back

For Questions About the Grant, Fill Out the Form Below: You can also email gisele@quantumgovernance.net for a quick response. First Name Last Name Email Message Send Thank you! We will be in contact.

The Michael G. Daigneault Excellence in Governance Grant The Michael G. Daigneault Excellence in Governance Grant honors our Co-Founder Michael G. Daigneault and his continued commitment to developing exceptional leadership in mission-driven organizations through governance excellence. This grant initiative aims to strengthen the governance effectiveness of nonprofits and credit unions, providing them with the tools and advice they need to drive positive, lasting change throughout their organizations and enhance their impact on the communities they serve. The grant provides one credit union ($250M in assets or less) and one charitable nonprofit (operating budget of less than $5 million annually) with a pro bono Governance Assessment inclusive of the following: a proprietary online governance survey a report comprised of survey data and expert recommendations based on survey results a facilitated workshop for the board and executive leadership resources such as policies, job descriptions, charters and more How to Apply Guidelines Before you apply, take a look at the eligibility requirements and timeline. Funding Guidelines & Timeline Application The application window for the Michael G. Daigneault Excellence in Governance Grant is May 4, 2026 through June 30, 2026. You can start your application, save it and return to complete it at your own pace. Click Here to Apply Today Questions? If you have any questions, please use the form below or email gisele@quantumgovernance.net Contact Us About Michael G. Daigneault Michael brings more than 45 years of governance, strategy and ethics expertise to boards and C-suite executive leadership of nonprofits, credit unions, governmental entities and other organizations of all shapes and sizes. He is credited for developing a proven methodology for assessing governance and strategy, including a proprietary survey tool for a variety of organizational types. Prior to founding Quantum Governance, Michael was a Senior Governance Consultant for BoardSource studying and advising nonprofit board leadership and Director of Advisory Services at DeLeon & Stang, a preeminent business management and accounting firm. Michael was the Founder and President of Ethics, Inc. – a private consulting and training firm specializing in business ethics for the private, nonprofit and public sectors. He also served as President of the Ethics Resource Center (ERC) in Washington D.C. Michael is a three-time graduate of Georgetown University, holding a B.A. in Philosophy from the College and a J.D. and a Master of Law from the Law Center. He was the first person to graduate from the Law Center with a Master of Law with a concentration in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility. A lifelong learner, Michael went on to complete the Corporate Governance Training Program at the Columbia Business School in 2021. Statement of Confidentiality: We will keep all information learned in this application process confidential. No information will be disclosed to any third party unless compelled to do so by law or regulation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may disclose information to our authorized contractors with an obligation to maintain confidentiality (e.g., Alchemer and data entry personnel) and personnel with a “need to access'' such information in order to review the grant applications.

< Back Un-Cage Your Thinking Michael Daigneault and Caitlin Hatch May 24, 2016 Good Credit Union Performance Doesn't Equal Good Governance Board members and CEOs frequently ask us: “Do we really need to focus on governance?” Before answering, we ask: “What’s behind your question?” The most common response we receive is, “If it ain’t broke, why fix it?” That is, many assume their governance is effective largely because the credit union’s “numbers are good.” When we suggest “just because a credit union is performing well financially, it doesn’t necessarily mean the credit union is being governed effectively,” we get a lot of blank stares. Our perspective comes as a surprise to some. If the credit union is “doing well” and the board is responsible for the credit union, then doesn’t that mean the board is doing its job effectively? In a word…no. Without a much deeper analysis, simply equating “good credit union performance” with “good board performance” or general “good governance” is leaping to an unwarranted conclusion. Of course, to many board members, it feels perfectly natural to make the leap. That’s because it is a result of how we, as humans, are designed to work. In some situations, making a quick analysis is perfectly appropriate. In others, it can lead to flawed decisions. So, why is the “natural conclusion” unwarranted here? Well…it could be the credit union is blessed with a great CEO and management team who are doing a terrific job – dare we say it? – despite the board! Or, it may be the credit union is fortunate enough to be benefiting from a strong economy. Or, it could be there is a long lag effect and decisions made five years ago are what improved performance. And, yes – it could be the board’s leadership is actually contributing to the credit union’s performance. It’s just that “good governance” is too complex a conclusion to simply reach from “good financial results.” So why do we do it anyway? We instinctively try to create some type of order out of our environment and our experiences by finding meaningful patterns and connections in acts, decisions, and the results that flow from them. We do this because we are designed to do so. Only by being more conscious of (1) how our own minds work, (2) being more aware of what connections we are consciously or unconsciously making, and (3) determining what facts are truly related and relevant to the issue at hand, can we avoid some of the thinking traps. Below are just a few of the tricks our brains regularly play on us while we are trying to “make sense” of our world. They are so subtle and so ingrained we are frequently not even aware of them. By calling them out, by asking each other the hard questions that must be asked at the fiduciary, strategic and generative levels, credit union leaders can together minimize the impact of the tricks our brains can play on us and, thereby, make better decisions. Seeing connections that may not be there . We can all take a little bit of information and build a story linking the bits of information into a simple explanation for what may be a very complex reality. But we don’t always have enough facts, and sometimes we aren’t even asking ourselves the right questions. Is good financial performance the same as good governance? How is the board directly contributing to the credit union’s success? Even if we can’t answer the questions, maybe by being aware the answers shouldn’t be based on an assumption can lead to better discussions, better decisions and a better understanding of what the board is actually contributing to the success of the credit union. Personal bias. We all filter facts through our own experiences so we better understand them. When others perceive our thoughts as open and relevant, we may be viewed by others as wise, aware or even empathetic. When our minds are already made up, when we don’t listen, many view our thinking in terms of a “personal bias.” We need to do all we reasonably can to be aware of our own biases and assumptions and try to be genuinely open about seeing the world differently. The halo effect. Our overall impression of something influences our feeling and thoughts about it, and it can work for you or against you. Take the city of Las Vegas, for example. People tend to either love it or hate it. The halo effect goes beyond a personal bias because you can have an opinion about Las Vegas without ever having been there. This effect can be so strong it can outweigh the facts, especially if they don’t agree with strong feelings or assumptions. Anchoring. We tie thoughts and feelings to a piece of information and then apply it to another piece of information, even if the two things do not have anything in common. We tend to apply specific facts to general circumstances. That first piece of information becomes the “anchor” around which we perform our analysis. Consider a credit union board that bases its discussions on “how we used to do it,” and uses that filter to make decisions for the present day. The analysis is “anchored” to a prior experience that may have little or no relation to the needs of present-day members. The endowment effect. It’s likely you’ve done this one, too. Have you ever assigned more value to your own abilities than others’ abilities? We all tend to think we are better than average. Study after study notes anywhere from 65 percent to 85 percent of people think they are “better than average.” Confidence can be a good thing, but that many people can’t be better than average, it is mathematically impossible. Boards—yes, even your board—may unconsciously assign more value to its efforts than the impact warranted. Your board may be one of the majority of credit union boards that would rate itself as “better than average.” Loss aversion. Credit union boards are notoriously risk adverse. Many strongly prefer avoiding loss to the risk of acquiring gains – or even serving members in better ways! Our focus on avoiding future loss can cause us to overestimate how truly risky some actions are. Being prudent is a good thing, but being extremely conservative can be the riskiest approach of all! These are six examples of how we typically think. This instinctive thinking is one of the things that makes us human, and it is embedded deep within us. But when thoughtful analysis is required, we may get led astray by our instincts. We suggest being aware of the reasons underlying your judgments and actions can help you and your colleagues make better decisions about what you do and how you do it for your credit union, your members and the communities you serve. Caitlin Hatch previously served as a senior consultant with Quantum Governance and has worked with credit unions for the past eight years, focusing on governance and strategic planning. Prior to that, she served for 25 years as general counsel and corporate secretary for the largest anthracite coal company in the United States. Previous Next

< Back No Higher Calling Michael Daigneault Nov 25, 2014 The challenge of effective CEO evaluation It never fails—when I’m with a group of board members (which is very, very often) and I ask “What are your core responsibilities?” someone will always say, “to hire and fire the CEO.” And yes, I suppose at a very basic level this is true. Perhaps there is no more important decision a typical credit union board makes than in the hiring of a CEO. There is, of course, so much more to developing a successful relationship with a credit union CEO than in his or her hiring and firing. If you were to think back over your career and consider the best mentors you had—the ones who were able to elicit from you your finest moments as an employee—certainly you would consider their contributions to your career far beyond the moment they hired (or even fired) you. Indeed “CEO support and oversight” (not solely hiring and firing the CEO) is a key board responsibility that Quantum Governance focuses on. (The others are governance and leadership; performance and results; strategic thinking, learning and planning; budget and resources; membership and community outreach; and stewardship, ethics and financial integrity. On the whole, my colleagues and I sometimes worry that credit union directors spend too much time focusing on fiduciary and operational- related matters. Ideally, we would like to see you talk a bit more at the strategic level in the board room. However, one area where we do see a great deal of variability--and perhaps a greater need to focus at the fiduciary level—is in the assessment process of the CEO. What does an effective or “constructive partnership” between the board and your credit union’s CEO look like? That is, what kind of relationship do you have—and will you forge in the future—with your CEO? What are the appropriate operational and strategic boundaries? How, in the big picture, can you help your CEO be even more effective? What goals should you set for your CEO? Should your CEO’s goals be the same as the goals of the credit union as a whole—or should there be goals unique to him or her? Ultimately, what type of process is appropriate to provide an effective CEO assessment? There are real challenges in the answers to these vital questions. In Quantum Governance’s work, we assess credit union boards nationally, and less than 30 percent of board members we’ve surveyed think they effectively establish performance goals for their CEO. And only slightly more (35 percent) think they are effective in holding their CEOs accountable for such goals when they have been established. If my math is correct, that means only about 10 percent of credit union boards perceive they are effectively holding their CEOs accountable to an agreed-upon set of performance goals! To maintain a truly effective constructive partnership with your CEO, a board must thoughtfully and collectively work to build, foster, maintain and improve the relationship. A regular and genuinely valuable assessment process of the CEO is vital. It can provide: a more objective and comprehensive analysis of your CEO performance, a higher degree of focus on key credit union goals, efforts, and initiatives, an in-depth look at important leadership strengths – as well as challenges, a means for your credit union’s leadership to get “un-stuck,” a way to reframe key governance, leadership and strategy issues, baseline data to measure future efforts and progress, and new ideas, insights and ways to move the credit union forward. And yet, sadly our surveys show that a third or more of credit union board members feel they are doing an “ineffective” or only “adequate job” of using a quality process that allows all board members to provide input on the CEO’s evaluation. Such a process is a vital element in maintaining a good relationship with your CEO over time. In addition to ensuring that all board members have an opportunity to provide input into the CEO assessment process, here are other options to seriously consider: For example: 1) you could also ask your CEO to complete a CEO self-assessment tool aligned with the question set board members use to provide feedback; (2) you could ask for 360-degree assessments by direct reports to the CEO; and, in appropriate instances, (3) you could ask for mentor or coach assessments of the CEO. The immediate goal is to provide valuable feedback to the CEO that accurately assesses his or her efforts and gives genuinely helpful guidance to improve overall performance. The ultimate aim is to build an effective partnership that will help your CEO and, through his or her efforts, actively assist the credit union and its members to succeed. In many respects, there really is no higher calling before you as a board. Previous Next

< Back A Matter of Leadership Michael Daigneault Apr 1, 2015 CUs need to pave a new road to ensure a strong, high-performing board over time. Perhaps one of the most vexing and controversial challenges facing the credit union community today concerns the fundamental question: How can a credit union ensure ongoing, effective governance and leadership? One of the historical building blocks of a CU is that it is a cooperative. It has long been thought that financial cooperatives will be best led by members who have an actual financial stake—or share—in the CU itself. Since their own money is invested in the CU, it is widely assumed they will be aware of—and appropriately engaged in—the proper oversight of the credit union’s financial affairs. CU members accomplish this by electing a board to take on a set of responsibilities designed to help ensure the safety and soundness of the members’ resources, as well as the effective governance of the CU. The current state of credit union governance is, however, being severely challenged by a rapidly changing environment and a sometimes stagnant board. (Read a bonus article, “ The Nine Leadership Challenges , ”.) One of my senior consultants came to Quantum Governance from the general nonprofit sector. She was stunned when assigned to her first credit union client. What she found was a group of directors, the majority of whom had been in their positions for well over 20 years. Because of the long-time tenure of these board members, the institution was facing the wholesale turnover of both its board and its CEO in the next few years. By holding on so long, the board members actually ended up endangering leadership continuity—exacerbating the very problem they professed to be solving by their continued service. The time has come for boards to reframe and “rebalance their responsibilities,” as Ram Charan has noted in his new book, Boards That Lead: When to Take Charge, When to Partner and When to Stay Out of the Way . Yes, board monitoring and oversight are still important, but they are no longer sufficient. The reality is that for many CU boards, more effective leadership is needed. What Leadership Leads To At Quantum Governance, we talk with a lot of credit union board members and, unfortunately, what we’re hearing from them about their ability to effectively lead and govern isn’t altogether positive. The following data is from our 2014 credit union compendium: More than 25 percent of all board members we’ve surveyed think their board is “less than effective” at building a leadership culture of trust. Thirty-seven percent think they are “less than effective” at holding each other accountable. Only one in five board members thinks their board is “very effective” at asking the hard questions that need to be asked. Twenty percent of board members say they are “ineffective” or only “adequate” at acting decisively when necessary. Sadly, about one in three directors says their board leadership and governance culture are “less than adequate” overall. Importantly, credit union boards are struggling to find the right people to serve—with only 18 percent saying they are “very effective” in doing so. How to Get More Effective Leadership So what’s a credit union to do? Renewing the strength of your board and its leadership can be accomplished using various techniques. If you answer “no” to even a few of the questions in the following section, you’ve got some work to do. And you need to get moving, or you’re likely to get left behind. Way, way behind. Board assessment. Is your board working on strengthening its governance practices? Are you reflecting on what’s going well and where you’re struggling? How are your committees functioning—especially your supervisory committee? Have you and your colleagues committed to a regular process of board evaluation? Training for needed competencies and strengths. Are you undertaking a robust training initiative that responds to your assessment results by strengthening your directors’ intellectual capacities and stretching the boundaries of current discussions? Do your fellow directors return from the latest CUES or other conference full of ideas and enthusiasm? (Read “ Starting Point ,” about developing plans for director learning, in this issue.) Associate board member program. Have you considered an associate director program that will afford up-and-coming volunteers the ability to learn about your credit union’s business “from the ground up?” Are your committee rosters creatively drawing from non-board members–those in the community who could foster a wider sense of support for the credit union and support your associate director program? Do your recruiting “tentacles” go beyond the supervisory committee? (Also read “ Working in the Governance Wings : Strategies for readying volunteers to give a good performance once on the board”) Term limits. This practice is rooted in one of the central principles of maintaining board effectiveness over time and the idea of creating (and sustaining) a careful balance between historical continuity and rejuvenation. A big potential benefit of limiting the length of service of credit union directors is fostering an influx of new talents, skills and energy to the board as a whole, as well as among board officers. Of course, there are a number of traditional challenges raised concerning term limits. Some credit unions fear losing valuable board leadership and institutional knowledge. (Get ideas for minimizing this risk ) It takes time to really understand the issues at play within an organization—and credit unions are complex financial organizations. Some believe it imprudent and inefficient to spend valuable time and energy getting board leadership “up to speed,” only to then urge them to move on at the close of their tenure. Another frequently raised concern is an actual or perceived shortage of suitable or willing candidates. Such a shortage of qualified candidates can be an authentic challenge—or simply the net result of very low turnover. Of course, if a board officer or member has proved effective, there are some who would suggest it is entirely appropriate to maintain the status quo because “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!” Certainly, I’m not saying that term limits are the answer. They are, clearly, only one tool. But they can be a helpful tool for your board’s leaders. Rotation of officers. Additionally, it is helpful to periodically rotate directors through board officer positions so a sustained concentration of power in a limited number of individuals (either actual or perceived) does not occur. Rotating board officers also helps an organization from getting stuck with just one leadership style. Board officer rotation is also thought to strengthen the pool of candidates willing to serve. This is due to the common occurrence that some will naturally aspire to board leadership roles—but only if it is perceived there is an authentic opportunity to attain a leadership role after a reasonable period of time and service. Finally, a lasting concentration of authority in a select, few individuals is, I believe, contrary to cooperative governance principles. Know the true role of the board chair. While there are courageous conversations that need to happen at the chair’s level when a board member is failing to live up to his or her fiduciary responsibilities, strengthening the leadership of the board is not just your chair’s responsibility. As a board member, it’s your responsibility to truly be engaged. Don’t simply attend the meetings and go through the motions; be an active player. A board member recently told me that he estimated about 70 percent of his colleagues barely even spoke at his CU’s board meetings. Is that leadership? Your members are depending on you. More Than Incremental Improvement The challenge I would place before you is this: Are you entirely sure your current situation isn’t broken? Fundamental or truly transformational changes—not just incremental—are what your credit union must undertake to craft the exceptional board of the future. A board that can truly help to overcome the types of challenges facing credit unions. It will take exceptional board leaders, working in constructive partnership with management, to be successful. It is likely that some of the leaders you need to move forward are already on your board; it is equally likely that some leaders you need to meet such challenges are not. I couldn’t agree more with author Michael Hudson, Ph.D. in his Credit Union Management Article, "When Directors Step Down:" Directors, when it’s your time, have the courage to step up and step down. Board chairs, you have an important role to play, too, in board rejuvenation. Have the hard conversations. If someone isn’t participating or truly adding value, it’s your job to find out why, and—if need be—help find someone who will. In the end, no single tool, technique or individual strategy is a substitute for what is needed most at this pivotal time in the credit union community and that is, of course, courageous leadership on the part of every member of the board. Previous Next

< Back Many Board Problems Boil Down to Communications Challenges Michael Daigneault and Jennie Boden Jan 22, 2019 Directors need to ask good, hard questions—to ‘trust but verify’ in a respectful and professional manner—all toward the good of the credit union. A great number of the governance challenges that we come across in the work that our firm, Quantum Governance, L3C, undertakes with credit unions can be boiled down to matters of communications. Are your board members crossing over into day-to-day operations? Well … have their roles and responsibilities been clearly defined, updated and effectively communicated to them? Are there two or three members of your board who are coming to meetings ill-prepared each and every month (or even just one)? It’s probably time for your board or governance committee chair to have a heart-to-heart, one-on-one conversation with those directors. Is the relationship between your board and CEO riddled with micromanagement, executive sessions and a lack of trust? It’s possible that you stopped having authentic, open dialogue far too long ago. After years of surveying credit union board members, supervisory committee members, CEOs and senior staff members, Quantum Governance, along with CUES, recently published The State of Credit Union Governance 2018: Five Data-Driven Recommendations for Future Success . In it were three key findings relative to the need for more open, trusting communications that both surprised and troubled us. We encourage you to take notice of them and discuss these key findings with your board. If your credit union is struggling with any of these issues, it might be time to polish your own communications skills—individually and as a group. Key Finding No. 1: More than a third of respondents surveyed reported that their board does only an adequate or less than adequate job of asking the hard questions that need to be asked. Key Finding No. 2: Thirty-nine percent of respondents reported that their board is only adequate or less than adequate at holding each other accountable. Key Finding No. 3: And only 25 percent of CEOs and 27 percent of senior staff reported that their boards are very effective at building a leadership culture of trust—compared to 53 percent of supervisory committee members and 44 percent of board members.So , what’s happening at all of these credit unions? We were recently working with a credit union that received what we would term below average scores on survey questions regarding “accountability” and “asking the hard questions.” “Where do we begin?” they asked. Luckily for them, their score on the “trust” question was particularly high—a good starting ground and a place from which to build. They were quick to say that they all got along and worked well together—maybe too well together, perhaps? How many of your board votes are unanimous? Are your board members held accountable when it’s appropriate? And, how many hard questions are you asking in your board meetings? The mark of a good board is not unanimity or harmony 100 percent of the time. Your job as a board member is to ask good, hard questions. To trust but verify. In a respectful and professional manner. All toward the good of the credit union. Be authentic. Be direct. Be open. Keep your promises. Keeping promises builds trust, and you’ll need to rely on strong relationships of trust while you’re holding each other accountable in the boardroom. Speaking of accountability: Hold each other accountable as board members. Ask the hard questions that need to be asked. It’s among your most fundamental roles as board members. Previous Next

< Back Who Needs A Shadow Board? Jennie Boden Jun 25, 2024 Add younger employees and members directly to your C-suite and board to benefit from their skills and knowledge today. I read with interest a Fortune article entitled “ Companies are turning to ‘Shadow Boards’ to keep in touch with the real world .” The author, Lila MacLellan, defines a shadow board as “a committee of typically younger employees who come together within a firm to advise the management team on key topics, such as company culture, product marketing, trends in technology, and sustainability efforts.” She continues, noting “They are not an official board, of course, but their views often supplement those of experienced, much older corporate directors and C-suite leaders. “These advisory groups give some businesses insight into their customers’ tastes and passions.” MacLellan reported that companies like The Body Shop have embraced the trend, and her colleague, Fortune ’s Orianna Rosa Royle, recently found that The Body Shop developed its shadow board, with its members aged 30 and under, “when it became aware of the gap between the company’s youngest workers and its leadership team and directors.” After reading the article, a colleague of mine posed a logical question: “Would shadow boards be a good strategy for credit union?” The question made sense. After all, our own 2023 State of Credit Union Governance recently found that 89% of credit union board members are aged 51 or older, and the average age of most credit union members in North America is 53. But here’s the thing. Creating another board isn’t a ready-made solution to the problems of an aging board and membership. In my mind, it’s simply a workaround. In our work, we’ve found that most credit unions struggle managing the governing boards that they already have. Many credit union boards have failed to evolve their governing roles and responsibilities even as their credit unions have grown around them—from financial institutions with assets of $250 million to those with well over $1 billion; some face challenges with that ever-elusive balance of authority between the board and the CEO and still others are still lingering “in the weeds” too much, not finding their stride in being strategic thinkers. Marie Kondo has ushered in the era of “tidying up,” not “cluttering up.” You must attend to that which you have, and like I said, too many governing boards are already flying under the radar, receiving too little attention. Why add another? Instead, add those younger employees and members directly into your C-suite and onto your governing boards— of course, given that they meet the requisite qualifications . Don’t keep them waiting in the wings until they reach some magical age where you deem them acceptable for full service. Benefit from their skills and knowledge now. A Gen Z member of our team recently sat in on a webinar proclaiming to share insights into the mind of the Gen Z credit union member. It was taught by two individuals in their 50s. In. Their. 50s. To be fair, our team member said they got some things right, but they also got a lot of things wrong. After, we asked her to present to our team what she thought that members of her generation were looking for from their financial institutions. You know what she said? Hope. To learn more about what Gen Zers really think, read this May blog from Quantum Governance’s governance administrator, Lauren Paradise. Previous Next

< Back The Learning Board Michael Daigneault Sep 23, 2014 Three key building blocks I’ve been a serial learner most of my life. In fact, I drive my wife and colleagues crazy lugging multiple iPads, books, articles and videos around with me wherever I go. I have a book recommendation for nearly everyone who crosses my path. I’m such a space nut that I attended adult space camp (“adult” perhaps being a relative term) at the tender age of 35—to train on the actual simulators that NASA astronauts used in years gone by—because I was curious to learn what it was like to fly the Space Shuttle. Call me a learning geek. So I guess it won’t surprise you that I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the idea of building a culture of learning among credit union boards and about how such a culture might just be the salve to a number of credit union challenges. As it happens, 25 years ago, Peter Senge, an American systems scientist and a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management (host of the first segment of CUES’ Strategic Innovation Institute ), suggested the benefits of becoming a “learning organization”—one that has developed a culture that actively encourages leaders, managers and employees to “continuously acquire, transfer and create new knowledge.” Senge’s thesis was applauded when it emerged, but for many large corporations and institutions to actually become continuous learning organizations was an overwhelming and daunting challenge. The personal computer and Internet were still in their infancy. (To give it some historical context, it was the same year “www” was proposed for universal use on the Web, and the Apple computers at the time were the Macintosh Classic and the Lisa. We would have to wait another 11 years for the first generation iPod!) I’d like to suggest that Senge was right in his appraisal of what needed to happen, but seriously ahead of his time. The digital and conceptual environment of today had to be born to enable his vision of a learning organization to genuinely flourish. But the time has been here for a while and it’s time for credit unions to get aboard this train. Today’s credit union faces a particularly challenging, rapidly changing and unpredictable landscape. The cycle times for new products and services have become extremely compressed. Entrepreneurial disrupters can go from an idea to having a major impact on the financial or technological landscape in just months or years. (For example, Square became a $2 billion corporation in just two years.) With ever-increasing regulatory complexities, consolidation, evolving board governance practices, exploding technologies, and the quickly changing needs and expectations of your members and community, the demands on credit union leaders have become greater than ever. This is your moment ... you can allow the challenges to overcome you, or you can overcome the challenges. It is vital that your board and senior management identify key trends, changes and developments quickly— appreciate the implications of such shifts quickly—and courageously help your credit union to adapt quickly. Why the rush? Simply put, the world won’t wait for you. It will change at its own pace … credit unions will have to work very hard to just keep up, let alone “get to the future first!” How can your leadership ensure that it: (1) is genuinely aware of the critical changes taking place; (2) deeply appreciates the implications of those changes; (3) is able to meaningfully partner with management to craft strategies that respond to key shifts and needs; and (4) can do so in an economic climate that demands speed and effective execution of vital strategic choices? Indeed, one of the most important strategic challenges facing nearly all credit unions today is how to individually and collectively learn the changes that are taking place around them, ask the hard questions that need to be asked, strategically experiment, capture the learning from those experiments, and innovate rapidly enough to ensure the relevance of credit unions for years to come. I am convinced that a genuine commitment to be a modern-day “learning organization” led by a “learning board” will help your credit union better understand, successfully innovate and rapidly adapt to the swiftly changing world that surrounds it. But, what do I mean when I say you should build a learning organization and board? And, where do you begin? There are three key building blocks for any credit union leader seeking to foster a learning culture: A supportive learning environment. First, you will need to make a conscious—credit union-wide—that you are dedicated to building a learning organization. It takes a commitment of time, energy and resources. And not just from your board members. Your credit union’s senior management team will be required to contribute and, often, play an active role in helping board members access key learning resources. A concrete learning process. A number of helpful resources are available to support your efforts. Certainly your CUES Director or Center for Credit Union Board Excellence membership opens up a number of important doors to ongoing learning, training and conferences. Be specific about your credit union’s expectations concerning active learning. Outline initial and ongoing requirements for board members, and don’t forget to include senior management and your employees in the fold. Include an assessment of your own and your employees’ commitment to learning as a part of your annual evaluation processes. Leadership that reinforces learning. Lastly, and most importantly, your commitment to learning must come from the top-down – demonstrated overtly by both the board and the senior management team. At my own organization, my staff knows how important ongoing learning is to me. While space camp may have been a dream for me, I do ensure that we regularly include key questions, strategic ideas and even provocative book discussions on the agendas for every one of our quarterly team meetings… Previous Next

< Back Advice from My Hero Michael Daigneault Mar 26, 2019 Six key responsibilities of every board, gleaned from my conversation with world-renowned expert Ram Charan. There’s nothing like meeting your hero. For some, that might equate to a football player or a musician or maybe a politician — a well-known celebrity type, whose mere physical presence is immediately recognized by all. For a governance geek like me, heroes are fewer and farther in between. But they do exist and when they do, they rise like giants. Thanks to my good friends at CUES, I met my hero a few months ago on the eve of the 2019 CUES Symposium in Nassau, Bahamas. And because they are, indeed, good friends, I was lucky enough to be afforded some private time with Ram Charan, the world’s leading expert in corporate governance. Along with some members of my team, I explored some of the most pressing concerns of the day with him — challenges that perplex even the most skilled and tenured credit union board members and CEOs. I've got the picture to prove it! I imagine I’ll be mining the notes from our conversation for quite a time to come, and I look forward to bringing you the fruits of those labors in future blogs. For now, I am pleased to share with you six key responsibilities central for every board outlined by Ram as he spoke to the board chairs and CEOs assembled at the Symposium: Ensure effective board composition. This is one of your board’s most fundamental roles and responsibilities. Board renewal at its core is also one of the most difficult. The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018, published by Quantum Governance and CUES found that a full 46% of respondents described their effectiveness in finding, recruiting and nominating new talent to their board as only adequate or less than adequate. Do you have the right directors and the right officers for your board? Don’t just hire your CEO, coach him or her for success, too. If you are lucky enough to have the right CEO, take care not to lose him or her. Ensure that you have a strong relationship with your CEO, as well as a succession plan in place on day one. Develop the right strategy to lead you into the future. Here it’s important to work in a full, constructive partnership with your credit union’s CEO and management team. Focus on the vision, mission, culture, strategic goals, objectives and metrics, and then let your CEO and his/her management team worry about operational work plans that support effective implementation. Keep an eye toward the horizon. Are you clear that you see things today will build the future tomorrow? Look for opportunities; many will fail but many will grow. The board adds value in asking questions of opportunity and in sowing the seeds. Stay current on important trends. Allocate enough time at the board level to learn about industry trends so that you can contribute to the strategy effectively. Study FinTech, digital corporations, consumer trends and more — anything that will give your credit union an edge over its competitors. Monitor the credit union’s performance. Rely on your CEO and his/her management team to deliver the data you need to monitor performance. Ensure that you are asking questions that “trust but verify” the credit union’s position and progress. Be sure to rely also on empirical data, and finally, ask yourselves these questions. In the last quarter: What three things: 1) Have we done very well; 2) Have we not done well; and 3) Will we do differently? Previous Next

< Back Serving Members’ Best Interests Benefits From A Constructive Partnership Jennie Boden Aug 24, 2021 When directors, supervisory committee members and executives collaborate effectively, members benefit. I spent the better part of my career working in the nonprofit sector. I like to say that I’ve had every job from executive assistant to executive director. And I loved every minute. When you work for a nonprofit—any kind of nonprofit—you do it because you love it. You know, in the back of your mind somewhere, that you could make more money in the corporate sector, and sometimes kind and well-meaning family and friends even remind you of it. But you stay because you love it, and you feel committed to what you’re doing. I’ve found the same to be true for all the credit union staff that I’ve met, interviewed and worked with since I joined Quantum Governance more than seven years ago. While credit unions aren’t exactly like some of the charitable nonprofits where I worked, they surely are mission-driven, and as you know, it’s all about serving the members. Of course, one of the central roles and responsibilities of a credit union board member is to “carry out his or her duties as a director in good faith, in a manner such director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the membership.” And we hear this from credit union board members all the time. Ask a credit union board member what his or her job is, and he or she will most often reply “to represent the best interests of the members.” One of my former colleagues used to say that was a board member’s response when he or she wasn’t sure what else to say—when the person wasn’t clear what the job really was. But I’m not quite so cynical. I do think that the roles and responsibilities of board members are changing, especially as credit unions continue to grow and the environment around them is becoming increasingly complex. But almost every board member I’ve ever met (and I’ve met a lot of them) really does seem to care about the credit union and is committed to doing what’s right for their members. The challenge, I believe, in this answer is that often board members believe they have the “corner on the market” in terms of representing the members’ best interests. What Does It Mean to Serve Members’ Best Interests Some years ago, Quantum Governance conducted a governance assessment for a large, multi-billion-dollar credit union. As a part of our assessment, we interviewed all the board members, supervisory committee members and senior managers. There seemed to be a perception among the board members that it was the board’s job to not only act “in the best interests of the membership” but almost to protect the membership from the staff. A member of senior management put it like this: “There’s a lack of trust. It’s not overt, so they [the board] won’t come out and say, ‘I don’t trust what you’re saying.’ There will be an attitude like what you’re saying is somehow colored for whatever reason. Like there’s another angle that we’re playing that benefits us and not the membership. As if we don’t care about the membership, too.” As if they “don’t care about the membership, too.” Of course, they do. A Constructive Partnership Serves Members’ Best Interests At Quantum Governance, we believe in the power of a constructive partnership between all three components of a credit union’s governing entities—the board, the supervisory or audit committee, and the senior managers. A constructive partnership puts a focus on effective collaboration, rather than control or even competition between the board and senior management. It actively fosters a leadership culture of trust that extends beyond even the credit union’s board and senior management to include the members of the supervisory or audit committee so that all three governing bodies are working together—collaboratively—to execute fiduciary oversight, craft strategy, offer mutual support and hold each other accountable—all toward the betterment of the credit union and in its members’ best interests. A constructive partnership recognizes that each of the three governing bodies has its own distinct roles and responsibilities. For example, of course the board and the board alone is responsible for setting the CEO’s salary and benefits, and we would never expect the board to wade into day-to-day operations or members of senior management to oversee the external audit that is put in place as a check and balance on their work. But just because the National Credit Union Administration has explicitly included the notion of protecting the members’ interests in the list of board members’ roles and responsibilities, don’t assume that everyone else either volunteering or working at the credit union isn’t just as committed to that very sacred duty, too—from the members of your supervisory or audit committee to your CEO and other members of senior management to the dedicated staff who manage your call center. Otherwise, especially in today’s economy, they’d likely be working elsewhere. Previous Next

< Back The State Of Credit Union Governance 2020: A Summary Jennie Boden Apr 2, 2020 For years, we’ve dreamt of studying the state of credit union governance. We know what you’re thinking: Dream bigger. Some people dream of European vacations. Fast cars. Beach houses. But for governance geeks like us, it’s often all about the data. In 2018, we were fortunate to partner with CUES to realize our dream, and The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018 was published. We made some groundbreaking discoveries, like reporting that board members and CEOs frequently differ on their perceptions about governance—and that their perceptions diverge even further based on tenure. We even found that bigger really may be better: Board members and CEOs of CUs with assets of $1 billion or greater had statistically and significantly higher survey scores overall on 18 of the 21 key questions asked concerning matters of governance. And we were satisfied, for a while. But our compendium of data kept growing, and our drive to create more information for you, our colleagues, clients and friends throughout the credit union community, was compelling. Today, we are pleased to announce The State of Credit Union Governance, 2020, which provides updated figures for 2018-2019 and draws on data from the governance assessment of 115 additional credit unions—114 in the U.S. and one based in Jamaica—to enrich the findings from our 2018 report. This year’s report is a collaboration between CUES, Quantum Governance and The David and Sharon Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance and Innovation at the Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto. Our findings are also derived from a supplemental online survey conducted in September 2019 with responses from 320 directors and CEOs across 170 U.S. credit unions. While many of the key findings from 2018 still ring true today (if you haven’t read the 2018 report , we encourage you to begin there), the 2020 report is full of new discoveries that will challenge you and your credit union to new levels of governance excellence. 2020 Key Findings Board Structure and Composition: Demographic diversity was identified as the number one priority for credit union board recruitment (53%). The next highest priority identified when recruiting new members to credit union boards was an ability to focus on the future (51%). (See Figure 1.) Board members continue to think that soft skills, such as an ability to focus on the future (76%) and independent mindedness (66%), are most valuable in the boardroom. Credit union boards are more gender-diverse than their counterparts in other sectors. The average credit union board has nine members, of which three are women (36%) and one is a visible minority (16%). Board Governance: Credit union boards that focus on bolstering their governance tend to adopt a governance committee more readily than those that do not have a concerted focus on good governance. When looking closely at the 1,060 director responses in our sample, we found that directors on the same board would often report very different—and sometimes opposing—perspectives on their board’s effectiveness in four fundamental areas of board renewal: 1) periodic governance assessment; 2) the action plan based on governance assessment outcomes; 3) the director onboarding process; and 4) the frequency of board member renewal. Board Leadership: Survey respondents identified seven important leadership functions for board chairs that fall within two primary categories: 1) establishing processes (e.g., allocating time, setting the agenda, etc.); and 2) working with people (e.g., appointing committee members and chairs). Although most survey participants report that their boards do not limit the number of terms a board chair can serve, we found that more than a third do. Term limits for board chairs can range anywhere from a year to more than 10 years. More than half of the participants whose boards have a term limit in place for their chairs reported limits of less than five years. An impressive 92% of all surveyed board members report that their board is effective at maintaining a good working relationship with their CEO. However, as in the 2018 report, the average board member and CEO differed on how effective they thought their boards were on a range of key governance measures. In 2020, across the 81 surveyed CUs that provided a CEO response, we found that there’s disagreement between the board and CEO regarding the board’s effectiveness on 22 out of 49 survey questions, on average. Credit Union Strategy: We found that 32% of survey respondents do not feel that their board is effective in helping to develop the credit union’s vision, mission and strategy. Most survey respondents say they should slash—by a third—the average time they spend on routine items and operational oversight (i.e., items that do not require debate or can be approved with a single motion as on a consent agenda) and invest an average of 10% more of their time on strategic matters. (See Figure 2.) Decision-Making: Many credit unions have at least one director who says that the board is ineffective at asking hard questions (53%), holding each other accountable (54%) or engaging all members in the work of the board (49%). While directors had misgivings about how decisions are reached, most believe the decisions their boards made were ultimately good, and they could stand by them and speak with one voice. Recommendations Since many of the findings from the 2018 report remain relevant, we encourage you to revisit those recommendations as a baseline; they will serve you well as strong building blocks for any governance program. From there, we would encourage you to consider our newest recommendations from the 2020 report: Board Renewal: Focus on strategic thinking and independent mindedness. Your credit union is a complex financial institution navigating the era of greatest change in the history of the credit union movement. As a result, your board requires meaningful financial literacy, business acumen and specialized skills in such specialties as law, accounting and human resources. However, even boards with the most skilled members will fail to add value without independent mindedness and strategic thinking. Board Diversity: More than ever, credit unions are acknowledging the value of demographic diversity among board members, including gender, race/ethnicity and age. However talking about it as a priority is not enough. To ensure that your board is truly diverse, you will need to be clear in your objectives and work hard at executing them. Once you know the demographic balance you are looking for, you will need a plan to help you find the right people. Board Leadership: Take your board chair position very seriously. Although your CEO is responsible for carrying out your credit union’s strategy on a day-to-day basis, no individual in your credit union has more potential to add value than your board chair. Ensure that you have a robust, concrete job description in place for this important position. Board Governance: Build alignment around what “effective” truly means. It is both normal and constructive for board members to disagree. One might argue that without disagreement there can be no excellent decisions. In too many cases, however, our data highlights boards where one or more directors have assessed the board’s effectiveness at polar opposite ends of the spectrum. Ensure that you are engaging in these types of conversations in the boardroom—what does “effective” really look like for you? Strategic Thinking, Learning and Planning: Invest more time in strategic matters. The most valuable skill identified in credit union boardrooms today is the ability to focus on the future, yet we found that 32% of survey respondents do not feel that their board is effective in helping to develop the credit union’s vision, mission and strategy. Ensure that your board is doing everything it can to be effective in this fundamental role and responsibility. Previous Next