Search Results

< Back Who's on Your Board Today? Tomorrow? Michael Daigneault and Jennie Boden Mar 27, 2018 The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018 report finds credit unions are more certain of their current mix of directors than they are about the future composition of their boards. Here’s what this means for board renewal. Data from our new report, The State of CU Governance, 2018 , find that the majority of credit unions feel pretty good about who’s currently on their boards—but are much less sure about the future.Almost three-quarters of survey respondents (74 percent) of respondents report that their boards are “effective” or “very effective” at having the right mix of skills/experience to accomplish [their] governance roles and responsibilities. But remarkably, almost half of all of the survey respondents (46 percent) describe their effectiveness in “attracting the right people to serve on the board” in the future as only “adequate,” or “ineffective” or “very ineffective.” Figure 1: Attracting the Right People to Serve on the Board - Overall Our experience is that your collective worries about attracting the right folks to serve on your credit union’s board are well-founded—and things may get worse before they get better! The number of board members available to serve in the coming years is likely to shrink. Using generational definitions from Pew , the Boomer generation (born 1946–1964) consists of 76 million people and is shrinking. Generation X (born 1965 – 1980) is estimated to be only around 55 million people, causing a significant lack of potential board members for a good number of years until the much larger millennial generation (born after 1980) begins to peak. This means that you and your board colleagues will be competing more and more for fewer and fewer potential board members. In his book, Generations: The Challenge of a Lifetime for Your Nonprofit , Peter C. Brinckerhoff notes that both members of Generation X and millennials typically volunteer for different reasons and in different ways than members of the Boomer generation. Brinckerhoff goes on to say that members of the Boomer generation historically committed to volunteerism in support of institutions, whereas younger generations volunteer in support of people and issues rather than organizations. They often prefer discrete projects rather than large commitments, and they can experience all that volunteerism has to offer without having to be commit to regular “face-time,” all of which goes against traditional board service. So, how do you attract, and then keep, the ever-elusive millennial? Here are a few do’s and don’ts to consider as you work to refresh your board’s membership: DO: Talk about your credit union’s mission. Millennials are often cause- or mission-driven, but ensure that you’re talking to them in language they understand, using today’s technology. Mix your credit union’s business with passion. Ensure that your board meetings are not all business. While addressing the business of the day is important, see that you are also addressing the broader, strategic impact that your credit union is having (see point No. 1, above). Bring them on in multiples. That is, don’t just add one millennial at a time to your board or its committees; add a number of them so that they don’t feel like a token (see point No. 1, below). DON’T: Treat them as tokens. It seems like everyone is talking about adding a millennial to their boards. Ensure you have a meaningful role for them to fill on your board and its committees (see also point #3 above). Under-estimate their abilities & skills. They have a lot to contribute; ensure that you are listening and learning from them. Think of them as “kids.” While for many board members, they may be the same age as your kids, they are not your kids. Treat them with the professional respect that they are due. Previous Next

< Back A Matter of Leadership Michael Daigneault Apr 1, 2015 CUs need to pave a new road to ensure a strong, high-performing board over time. Perhaps one of the most vexing and controversial challenges facing the credit union community today concerns the fundamental question: How can a credit union ensure ongoing, effective governance and leadership? One of the historical building blocks of a CU is that it is a cooperative. It has long been thought that financial cooperatives will be best led by members who have an actual financial stake—or share—in the CU itself. Since their own money is invested in the CU, it is widely assumed they will be aware of—and appropriately engaged in—the proper oversight of the credit union’s financial affairs. CU members accomplish this by electing a board to take on a set of responsibilities designed to help ensure the safety and soundness of the members’ resources, as well as the effective governance of the CU. The current state of credit union governance is, however, being severely challenged by a rapidly changing environment and a sometimes stagnant board. (Read a bonus article, “ The Nine Leadership Challenges , ”.) One of my senior consultants came to Quantum Governance from the general nonprofit sector. She was stunned when assigned to her first credit union client. What she found was a group of directors, the majority of whom had been in their positions for well over 20 years. Because of the long-time tenure of these board members, the institution was facing the wholesale turnover of both its board and its CEO in the next few years. By holding on so long, the board members actually ended up endangering leadership continuity—exacerbating the very problem they professed to be solving by their continued service. The time has come for boards to reframe and “rebalance their responsibilities,” as Ram Charan has noted in his new book, Boards That Lead: When to Take Charge, When to Partner and When to Stay Out of the Way . Yes, board monitoring and oversight are still important, but they are no longer sufficient. The reality is that for many CU boards, more effective leadership is needed. What Leadership Leads To At Quantum Governance, we talk with a lot of credit union board members and, unfortunately, what we’re hearing from them about their ability to effectively lead and govern isn’t altogether positive. The following data is from our 2014 credit union compendium: More than 25 percent of all board members we’ve surveyed think their board is “less than effective” at building a leadership culture of trust. Thirty-seven percent think they are “less than effective” at holding each other accountable. Only one in five board members thinks their board is “very effective” at asking the hard questions that need to be asked. Twenty percent of board members say they are “ineffective” or only “adequate” at acting decisively when necessary. Sadly, about one in three directors says their board leadership and governance culture are “less than adequate” overall. Importantly, credit union boards are struggling to find the right people to serve—with only 18 percent saying they are “very effective” in doing so. How to Get More Effective Leadership So what’s a credit union to do? Renewing the strength of your board and its leadership can be accomplished using various techniques. If you answer “no” to even a few of the questions in the following section, you’ve got some work to do. And you need to get moving, or you’re likely to get left behind. Way, way behind. Board assessment. Is your board working on strengthening its governance practices? Are you reflecting on what’s going well and where you’re struggling? How are your committees functioning—especially your supervisory committee? Have you and your colleagues committed to a regular process of board evaluation? Training for needed competencies and strengths. Are you undertaking a robust training initiative that responds to your assessment results by strengthening your directors’ intellectual capacities and stretching the boundaries of current discussions? Do your fellow directors return from the latest CUES or other conference full of ideas and enthusiasm? (Read “ Starting Point ,” about developing plans for director learning, in this issue.) Associate board member program. Have you considered an associate director program that will afford up-and-coming volunteers the ability to learn about your credit union’s business “from the ground up?” Are your committee rosters creatively drawing from non-board members–those in the community who could foster a wider sense of support for the credit union and support your associate director program? Do your recruiting “tentacles” go beyond the supervisory committee? (Also read “ Working in the Governance Wings : Strategies for readying volunteers to give a good performance once on the board”) Term limits. This practice is rooted in one of the central principles of maintaining board effectiveness over time and the idea of creating (and sustaining) a careful balance between historical continuity and rejuvenation. A big potential benefit of limiting the length of service of credit union directors is fostering an influx of new talents, skills and energy to the board as a whole, as well as among board officers. Of course, there are a number of traditional challenges raised concerning term limits. Some credit unions fear losing valuable board leadership and institutional knowledge. (Get ideas for minimizing this risk ) It takes time to really understand the issues at play within an organization—and credit unions are complex financial organizations. Some believe it imprudent and inefficient to spend valuable time and energy getting board leadership “up to speed,” only to then urge them to move on at the close of their tenure. Another frequently raised concern is an actual or perceived shortage of suitable or willing candidates. Such a shortage of qualified candidates can be an authentic challenge—or simply the net result of very low turnover. Of course, if a board officer or member has proved effective, there are some who would suggest it is entirely appropriate to maintain the status quo because “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!” Certainly, I’m not saying that term limits are the answer. They are, clearly, only one tool. But they can be a helpful tool for your board’s leaders. Rotation of officers. Additionally, it is helpful to periodically rotate directors through board officer positions so a sustained concentration of power in a limited number of individuals (either actual or perceived) does not occur. Rotating board officers also helps an organization from getting stuck with just one leadership style. Board officer rotation is also thought to strengthen the pool of candidates willing to serve. This is due to the common occurrence that some will naturally aspire to board leadership roles—but only if it is perceived there is an authentic opportunity to attain a leadership role after a reasonable period of time and service. Finally, a lasting concentration of authority in a select, few individuals is, I believe, contrary to cooperative governance principles. Know the true role of the board chair. While there are courageous conversations that need to happen at the chair’s level when a board member is failing to live up to his or her fiduciary responsibilities, strengthening the leadership of the board is not just your chair’s responsibility. As a board member, it’s your responsibility to truly be engaged. Don’t simply attend the meetings and go through the motions; be an active player. A board member recently told me that he estimated about 70 percent of his colleagues barely even spoke at his CU’s board meetings. Is that leadership? Your members are depending on you. More Than Incremental Improvement The challenge I would place before you is this: Are you entirely sure your current situation isn’t broken? Fundamental or truly transformational changes—not just incremental—are what your credit union must undertake to craft the exceptional board of the future. A board that can truly help to overcome the types of challenges facing credit unions. It will take exceptional board leaders, working in constructive partnership with management, to be successful. It is likely that some of the leaders you need to move forward are already on your board; it is equally likely that some leaders you need to meet such challenges are not. I couldn’t agree more with author Michael Hudson, Ph.D. in his Credit Union Management Article, "When Directors Step Down:" Directors, when it’s your time, have the courage to step up and step down. Board chairs, you have an important role to play, too, in board rejuvenation. Have the hard conversations. If someone isn’t participating or truly adding value, it’s your job to find out why, and—if need be—help find someone who will. In the end, no single tool, technique or individual strategy is a substitute for what is needed most at this pivotal time in the credit union community and that is, of course, courageous leadership on the part of every member of the board. Previous Next

Supervisory & Audit Committee Resources A Cautionary Tale of Risk Management in This Time of Bank Failures Defining roles and responsibilities and continuing education help ensure appropriate coverage. Read More The Importance Of A Truly Independent Supervisory Committee If you’re shifting to an ‘audit’ committee instead, be careful not to sacrifice independent oversight at the altar of efficiency. Read More A Case for Reaching Higher Musings on the Federal Reserve’s proposed guidance on supervisory expectation for boards Read More ERM Is Everyone's Responsibility 10 steps to take to ensure your leadership is doing all it can to identify and manage risk Read More Supervisory Committees Function Well, But... Just like CUs and their boards, supervisory committees must change with the times. Read More

< Back Hope for Gen Z Comes in the Shape of Credit Unions Lauren Paradise May 6, 2024 Generation Z has the potential to be the greatest credit union generation, so why are so many credit unions struggling to get their attention? Generation Z has the potential to be the greatest credit union generation, but we are struggling financially and we need credit unions to step up to help. After I signed the lease for my first apartment last year, instead of the excitement you might expect I would feel, all I felt was hopelessness. I kept hearing the words of the leasing agent in my mind: “Rent is going to be X but that doesn’t include the security deposit or electric/gas utilities or pet fee or parking or Wi-Fi or furniture or laundry. Oh and it will go up next year.” All I could hear was fee after fee after fee, topped off with the guarantee of rising rent. It felt like there was going to be an extra fee just to breathe. This is the harsh reality for Gen Z after college. We feel like we are financially falling behind even before our journey begins. A few months ago, I attended a webinar that was supposed to be a facilitated discussion on what my generation (Gen Z) wants from their financial institutions, and how credit unions can connect with them. I had anticipated that someone of my generation would be speaking. How else would you be able to accurately represent the Gen Z perspective? To my disappointment, it was given by two people well beyond Gen Z, and while some of their statements were true, others were entirely inaccurate. Not including a Gen Z person in the conversation was a total miss. It’s a theme I have noticed in webinars and articles about Gen Z: they are all from the outsider’s perspective, observing us from a distance and not accurately reflecting our voice. After attending that webinar I asked myself, “As a member of Gen Z, what DO we really want from our financial institutions?” Of course, we want the obvious elements like a strong mobile app and financial education, but the first thing that came to my mind was HOPE . More than anything, my generation needs hope for their financial future. With the cost of living through the roof (for example, the cost of groceries is up 25% since 2020 ), many young people right now are asking themselves, “What is the point?” We feel a sense of futility in making smart financial choices like where to bank or apply for a loan, wondering if our choices will amount to anything in the face of the rising cost of everything. Despite that—and perhaps because my dad works for a credit union and I now work for a firm that works intimately with credit unions—the conclusion I have drawn is that credit unions are the ideal financial institutions for Gen Z. Yet only 4% of Gen Z are currently members of a credit union . Why is that? Perhaps the answer lies in that many members of Gen Z don’t even know what a credit union is, or if they do, they have misconceptions that deter them from being members. For example, the fact that credit unions are nonprofits in our communities should be a huge advantage in capturing younger members, as many of us loathe big corporations and find value in supporting local businesses . But Gen Z is almost assuredly not aware of things like shared branching and therefore sees the localized aspect of a credit union to be a weakness rather than a strength. Credit unions need to bridge this information and awareness gap, better leveraging social media to communicate frequently and hiring younger employees and ambassadors who can advocate from the inside, among many other strategies. Gen Z Is Aligned With Credit Union Philosophy There is a lot of alignment between the vision, mission and values of credit unions and what Gen Z is looking for—the messaging just needs to click. Ultimately, we want to feel like we are investing in something that will make a difference in our lives and in the lives of others. Credit unions are the prime foil to corporate banking greed. When I hear credit union board members share, “We need to keep members front and center in our minds at all times when making decisions for the credit union” or “We strive to have the lowest interest rates of any credit union in our area,” this is a refreshing change from the money-driven messaging of most corporations who seek to push the limits of what they can charge without losing customers, instituting absurd money grabs like surge pricing. Recently, I spoke with a credit union that is offering a mortgage loan with a down payment as low as 3%. This lower rate was established in direct response to their younger members being unable to buy a home in the current housing market. This type of offering can make a tangible difference in young people’s lives and is one example of how credit unions help us achieve our financial goals, hit life milestones, and offer up hope. Credit unions can’t solve all of our problems, and they can’t control the external political and economic factors that contribute to the financial angst of Gen Z, but they have a unique opportunity to ease the emotional burden and equip Gen Z with the tools, products and support that we need to better position ourselves to reach our financial goals. Most importantly, credit unions can offer their young members HOPE for their financial future. Previous Next

< Back Two Of The Five Top Questions Board Chairs Have Michael Daigneault and Jennie Boden Oct 23, 2018 1. Should chairs vote? 2. What’s the best way to ask a director to move on? Quantum Governance recently had the privilege of spending a few days with nearly 100 credit union board chairs, vice-chairs and others when we conducted the Board Chair Development Seminar for CUES in Amelia Island, Fla. In this article, we put forth two of the top five questions we learned were on their minds and make an attempt to answer them. Question 1: Should board chairs vote on all regular matters? This first question surprised us. We were amazed to find that 50 percent or more of the board chairs in attendance said they didn’t vote unless there was “a tie in the boardroom.” Remarkable. They, in turn, were stunned when we told them that this practice was simply wrong. Digging further, their assumptions behind their abstention made some sense and evidenced an important desire for fairness. For example, they were concerned that: “A board chair, in expressing his or her opinion, might unduly sway the will of the whole,” and “Our board chair is the most senior member of our board and everyone looks to him; it wouldn’t be fair.”These are valid points, and we wholeheartedly agree on the need to ensure fairness and the ability to hear everyone’s voice in the boardroom. However, even board chairs have rights! The No. 1 question on Robert’s Rules of Order ’s online FAQs is: “Is it true that the president [also meaning chair] can vote only to break a tie?” Robert’s Rules of Order says “No, it is not true that the president [again, here, they also mean a chair] can vote only to break a tie. If the president is a member of the voting body [which the board chair of a credit union is], he or she has exactly the same rights and privileges as all other members have, including the rights to make motions, to speak in debate, and to vote on all questions ….” When you and your colleagues on the board address conflicts of interest, your efforts are not about eliminating them, but mitigating them. Similarly, your board chair not only has rights, but also a governance duty to independently express his or her opinion on matters before the board. He or she should also share experience, thoughts and perspectives which you likely want to consider. Follow some basic steps and you’ll be fine: Elect individuals to the role of chair who can be fair, objective facilitators. Ask the chair to share his/her thoughts at the close of the discussion, not at the beginning. Unless the vote is a private ballot, the chair’s vote should be rendered last. (Note that we found this voting issue to be so important that we’re working on a full white paper on this topic, and it will be published soon!) Question 2: How do I talk with a board member about moving on? In our recently released State of Credit Union Governance, 2018 , 74 percent of respondents reported that their boards are effective or very effective at having the right mix of skills or experience to accomplish its governance roles and responsibilities. And yet, still, asking a board member to move on remains one of the top issues on board chairs’ minds. We get it. It’s a hard one. Without term limits in place at many credit unions, board members may serve far beyond their time. We know it sounds harsh, but it’s true. We had a client once warn us that there were one or two members on the board that might have dementia, but they did not ask them to move on for fear of upsetting them. From a human perspective, we understand it. But from a governance perspective, one has to ask whether those board members are able to aptly fulfill their legal duties and governance roles and responsibilities. We offer these five tips to help you engage in the hard conversation when it’s time for a board member to transition off your board. Have your chair, along with at least one other trusted board member, engage in a private conversation, and: Be respectful and open; approach the conversation with a genuine desire to learn. Try to understand where the board member in question is—what his or her perspective is and what might make a transition easier. Focus on what you’re hearing and not on what you’re saying. This isn’t about you. This is about your board member. People will respond better if they are feeling heard. Be direct and get to the point. We know it’s a hard conversation, but don’t “beat around the bush.” Don’t put it off! When you know that you need to have the conversation, have it. You’ll be doing everyone a favor. Don’t wait until you get to the point of having a member with dementia—even possible dementia—on your board. Expect a positive outcome, even if that outcome may be that the board member moves on; it could be good for him/her and the board. Not all transitions are bad. Don’t assume that the outcome will be bad for the board member. Look for a graceful exit and transition for all. We felt that all five of the top questions on board. chairs' minds were vital—and that if they were on the minds of the board chairs, they were likely on the minds of other directors and CEOs, too. (Are they on yours?) Previous Next

< Back Does A Divided Vote Make You A Divided Board? Jennie Boden Apr 25, 2023 A divided vote makes you a human board. And it’s what you do afterward that matters most. While most of our clients are credit unions, Quantum Governance also works with a wide variety of other non-profit organizations—foundations, associations and charitable groups, even a small children’s home in India with an annual budget of just $50,000—helping their boards and chief executives level up their governance and strategy. We learn from every organization, adding to the knowledge bank from which we draw for all of our clients. For example, in recent times, a former credit union board chair called to ask if we could help his local school board find its way back to solid ground. This school board, like many others, had experienced wars over masking, vaccines and more that arose during the COVID-19 pandemic. And these experiences had taken their toll. When the school board chair said, “You’re our last hope,” we knew we had to help. And so it was, when in the middle of an offsite with that school board client that a fundamental, universal governance question was asked: “If we have a divided vote, does that mean that we’re a divided board?” It was one of the best, most nuanced governance questions that I’d ever been asked. I share it with you now, my credit union colleagues who serve on the board, because I believe you do everything you can to elude divided votes. I think you loathe divided votes. I think you fear divided votes. I’ve even been told that you refrain from putting what you even think might become a divided vote on your meeting agendas. But have no fear. I’ll share with you the same answer that I gave my school board client in the hope that it will benefit you: “Divided votes do not mean that you’re a divided board. They mean that you’re a human board. They mean that you’re a board made of living, breathing people with different perspectives and different thoughts.” I continued, “Divided votes mean that you feel comfortable enough as a board to have robust conversations and share compelling and, yes, contrary points of view and to support them with your votes.” “It’s what happens after the vote that determines whether you are a divided board,” I said. “Do you speak with one voice?” I asked. “Or do you leave the boardroom still advocating strongly for your position to anyone and everyone who will listen? Or are you respectful of the will of the whole as your board service demands you to be?” While I don’t wish upon any board the contention and divisiveness that our school board client has faced in recent years, I do hope every board will have the courage to wade deeply into robust conversations, the strength to tolerate divided votes, and the respect, in the end, to support the will of the whole. Previous Next

< Back Moving Beyond The Strategic 'Moment' Michael Daigneault and Jennie Boden Sep 27, 2016 Incorporate strategic planning and thinking into your routine discourse. When more than 30 percent of our clients describe themselves as “less than effective” at something, we sit up and take notice. And that’s exactly how (and how many) of the board members and CEOs we work with describe the challenge of articulating a compelling future vision for their credit unions. Not having a future vision for your credit union is a genuine problem, but one that can be overcome (though not easily, or a third of our clients wouldn’t be struggling with it!). Is your credit union challenged with crafting or updating the foundational components of your overall strategic plan—vision, mission and strategic goals—as well as the more specific strategic objectives and metrics undergirding them? It's worth the struggle to get your future vision right. This is much more than just a convenient tagline or agreeable-sounding statement in your annual report. The conscious or unconscious future vision that a board and senior team hold in their heads has real consequences. Crafting a clear and effective path forward that will truly benefit members is among the most critical and nuanced challenges you will collectively undertake. Yet many boards and executive teams spend less time thinking about the consequential strategic issues facing their credit union than they do on small changes to the loan-loss ratio, car loan volume or even on a single member complaint suggesting that the carpet needs to be replaced in a branch. We recently facilitated the CUES Director Development Seminar in Santa Fe, New Mexico. When we asked the 100-plus attendees who included strategic discussions regularly on their board meeting agendas, one brave soul posited, “Well, we have an agenda item called the ‘strategic moment.’” Though the room spontaneously filled with laughter, the speaker was quite serious, and everyone knew it. Many other attendees may have recognized that by including such a “moment” on the agenda, their colleague was likely well ahead of their own routine meetings typically filled with data-intensive, financial and fiduciary oversight reports. Veteran directors may recall the days when their credit union was just forming and their role was to pour over financial statements, do cash counts and fill the void that a lack of professional staff created. Today the director’s role is quite different. Unless your credit union is very small or in start-up mode, you rely on professional staff to brief you on financial and fiduciary reports. You need to provide effective oversight, hold staff appropriately accountable—and then move effectively to your strategic responsibilities that will help propel your credit union to flourish into the future. In that spirit, we recently developed a list of sample strategic topics for directors to discuss in board meetings, even just for 20-30 minutes. Not all of them are applicable to your situation, but they are the types of questions that can help you regularly exercise your strategic thinking muscles: What criteria would you use in considering—or rejecting—an offer to merge your credit union into a larger one? What types of risks does the evolution of payment systems foreshadow for your credit union? How is your credit union growing? How might you need to grow differently in the future? Even if your credit union is growing, is it genuinely improving members’ financial lives? What would the “ideal” board for the credit union you envision in the future be like? Do you have the right blend of directors for that future? What would the future focus be? What committees would the board have? What type of relationship would it have with your CEO and executive team? What type of relationship would it have with your members and the community? How does your credit union define its risk tolerance or philosophy? Are you too risk-averse? How does your credit union’s risk profile compare to peers? How should you balance ROA, risk and stewardship to members? How do you leverage your cooperative culture into a competitive advantage? Are there other success measures you should be looking at, beyond financial performance? We strongly encourage the board to work hard to fine-tune a strategic plan that includes clear vision and mission statements, strategic goals, objectives and metrics in constructive partnership with your committee leadership, CEO and executive team. After reaching a consensus on the features on the accompanying chart shown in blue, challenge your CEO and executive team to develop their organizational work plans to meet or exceed your agreed-upon strategic goals. But don’t stop there. Include regular and ongoing strategic thinking, discourse and potential changes to your strategic plan, if necessary, in board meetings throughout the year. Insist that your CEO and management team report regularly on the strategic metrics of success as you march toward achieving your strategic goals and objectives. Consider changes in the marketplace or your business environment regularly to assess whether anything needs to be fine-tuned, adjusted or even eliminated. Strategic planning and thinking are continual processes. Off-site sessions annually or every few years may be helpful to recalibrate your leadership’s thinking, but they’re not the end-all. The real work of strategic planning should be a regular feature of the discourse and thinking of the board and executive team—day in and day out, moving beyond the “moment” (though that’s a good start) to become the central focus of your most important deliberations. Previous Next

< Back More Listening, Less Mansplaining Jennie Boden Mar 22, 2022 In the boardroom and everywhere, it's important to hear all voices. I was recently facilitating a retreat for one of our credit union clients when one of the board members—a male board member—started going toe-to-toe with me on the subject of good governance. Really? I thought to myself. Okay, let’s go . I’ve been a professional in the national not-for-profit sector, focusing on governance, strategy and C-suite management issues, for almost 30 years. And I’ve been working specifically in the area of credit union governance for almost a decade. I’ve probably interviewed more credit union board members than, well, most everyone, and I’m an author of The State of Credit Union Governance studies published by CUES and Quantum Governance. I help assess and review governance data from 50 or 60 credit unions every year … every year . Now, I’m not trying to boast. But I am saying that I know my way around a discussion on credit union governance. Apparently, however, my male client knew more. The term mansplaining is relatively new—it first appeared in a Los Angeles Times piece in 2008—but the concept, of course, is not. The phenomenon of mansplaining is so common that it even now appears in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary and is officially defined as “when a man talks condescendingly to someone (especially a woman) about something he has incomplete knowledge of, with the mistaken assumption that he knows more about it than the person he’s talking to does.” For many women, mansplaining is a frustrating, recurring part of their professional lives, regardless of their position or tenure. While some may be tempted to call mansplaining a mere annoyance—or invoke gendered stereotypes that women are “too sensitive”—the impact of mansplaining behavior goes much deeper than words. In the boardroom, it can be a clear signal that a board member’s expertise is discounted and, according to the Society for Human Resources Management , it can even affect the way board members are nominated and selected for committees or leadership roles. Mansplaining in the Credit Union Boardroom So, why is this particularly relevant among credit unions? We know that credit unions have made significant progress in diversifying their boardrooms, especially as compared to other sectors: 36% of credit union board members are women, whereas women hold only 25% of board seats in Fortune 100 companies, according to a 2018 report by Deloitte and The Alliance for Board Diversity of America. Yet, even at 36%, women are still significantly underrepresented in our credit union boardrooms, which remain male- (and white-) dominated spaces. Much more work remains to be done to improve gender diversity in the boardroom to ensure that boards truly reflect the communities they serve. As most women know, mansplaining happens everywhere: It begins on the playground and carries through to the boardroom. But it doesn’t stop there. In fact, the concept of mansplaining is so universal that in 2016, a union in Sweden temporarily set up a hotline for workers to report incidents of mansplaining and seek counsel from professors, authors and other gender experts on strategies for dealing with this condescending behavior! Even the BBC offers a flow chart to help readers identify mansplaining even when they may not realize it’s happening to them! As we encourage boards to reflect on and improve their own diversity, we know that many credit unions will recruit new directors who don’t necessarily have banking or accounting backgrounds, but who are bright, driven leaders in their fields. They are strategic thinkers who are ready to learn more about what the credit union does. This diversity—both in terms of gender and racial background and also professional expertise—undoubtedly helps advance a credit union’s service to its members not only by ensuring a strong “ear to the ground” but also by deliberately crafting a leadership group that brings diverse experiences, skills and viewpoints all to strengthen the decisions made in the boardroom. Board members with prior sector experience will, naturally, lead in helping their new colleagues develop a greater understanding of the credit union and their responsibilities as board members. In fact, we encourage it. In offering guidance, however, it’s important to remember that your support should be offered in a way that’s conducive to learning and recognizes your new colleagues’ own talents and expertise versus sharing your own knowledge in a way that is condescending, meant to intimidate and discredit. Board members of all tenures and backgrounds should approach their role with what David Smith , an associate professor of practice at the Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, calls “healthy doses of humility and a learning orientation.” Smith also notes that a “prove it again” bias that women often experience “questions their competency by having them continually prove that they have the experience and ability to perform. Most men do not experience this bias as it is usually assumed that they are competent, and they are advanced more often on potential.” While this observation is based on his experience in the U.S. Navy, a credit union boardroom—a similarly male-dominated space—can also encourage these dynamics. How to Move Past Mansplaining How do we recognize and move past the mansplaining we observe in the boardroom? Smith’s research found that what women most appreciated in male mentors and allies was their capacity to listen—which Smith summarizes as “generous listening with an intent to understand and not fix her or fix her problem.” Recognizing the root impulse for this is also important: “As it turns out, many of us as leaders are socialized to be problem-solvers. We listen to a colleague until we discern the problem and then tell them how to fix it.” (Read more on this from Smith in “ More Listening, Less ‘Mansplaining’ Make Men Better Allies to Women Co-Workers .”) In the credit union boardroom, where we find various levels of expertise in accounting or banking, but a steadfast desire to learn, this is equally important for male colleagues to internalize. What are some other key strategies for creating inclusive, welcoming, and respectful spaces? Arin N. Reeves, Ph.D., of the University of Michigan offers a few suggestions : Create and use agendas for meetings to define intentions, decrease interruptions and offer clarity on who should be speaking and why. Adopt a “take turns” approach in meetings; it will provide additional structure around who should be speaking and offer all participants an opportunity to give their perspective. Separate “divergent thinking” (unstructured brainstorming and idea generation) from “convergent thinking” (idea analysis and decision-making) to prevent unwanted interruptions and allow for women’s voices to be included as an active part of the leadership and decision-making process. Speak up! We can all recognize the symptoms of “mansplaining,” and if we can respectfully call out and encourage reflection about this behavior, we can create more respectful, productive and effective board and committee meetings. We all know that there are challenges to recruiting board members. Don’t make the mistake of not fully appreciating or realizing the full potential of your board members by silencing those voices that will help to further the vision and mission of your organization. Previous Next

< Back ERM Is Everyone's Responsibility Michael Daigneault May 23, 2017 10 steps to take to ensure your leadership is doing all it can to identify and manage risk A study released last year— Risk Management for Nonprofits —raised quite a storm in some circles. While the particular risks faced by the charitable sector are often different than those in the credit union community, the study has, nonetheless, been an effective catalyst for raising awareness about the need to have a board-level conversation about risk and risk management. I’ve mentioned before that we have the good fortune of conducting governance assessments for credit unions throughout the United States. Only about a third of the CU boards we’ve assessed describe their ability to identify risk as “very effective,” and an even smaller group of them say they’re “very effective” at mitigating those risks once they’re identified. From a governance point of view, this is a pretty significant finding. And one that demands attention. For many CUs, discussions of risk begin and end with financial matters—interest rate risk, loan loss risk, fraud risk, etc. But is that enough? Aren’t there other risks that organizations face? And, what is risk, anyway? The authors of the Wyman/SeaChange study define risk as “unexpected events and factors that can have a material impact on an organization’s finances, operations, reputation, viability and ability to pursue its mission.” While the definition comes from a study on the charitable nonprofit sector, we think it’s a pretty good place to start in terms of framing the concept of risk for credit union board and committee members. But, let’s look a bit deeper, as some credit unions have begun to do. We are thinking about enterprise risk management, which is not just the responsibility of your board, management, board committees, a risk specialist, your external auditor or even an internal auditor. Yes, each has a role in understanding and managing risk. We’d also suggest that your supervisory or audit committee should play even greater role than typically given them. (Read more about the expanded role of the supervisory committee in “ Supervisory Committees Function Well ’ and “ Internal Watchdog, Plus … ” The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission is a voluntary, private-sector organization dedicated to guiding executive management and governance participants towards more effective, efficient and ethical business operations. It defines ERM as “a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, applied in strategy setting and across the enterprise, designed to identify potential events that may affect the entity, and manage risk to be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of entity objectives." Are you doing all that you can, as credit union leaders, “to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of entity objectives?” To get you started, consider these 10 steps: Ensure that your board assumes its full governance role, including not only its legal duties, but formal and informal governance responsibilities. With the rapid pace of change and the many threats facing CUs today, it’s imperative that your board understands that it must play a vital role. Formally task your supervisory or audit committee with ERM. Ensure that your committee is on the leading edge of today’s best practice of going beyond simply conducting an audit. Consistent with board policies, management will still conduct the operational work. It's the committee’s role to ensure it is being done regularly and effectively. Be sure you have the right people, in the right seats, to support effective ERM. Identify the best people from among your volunteers and staff. Develop an explicit risk tolerance statement that indicates the level of risk your credit union is willing to take. Once your board has assumed its duties in this area, this should be one of its first tasks. Be sure to constructively partner with your CEO and his or her management team, as well as members of your supervisory or audit committee. Develop a list of key risks and include brief scenario planning to address them. We had one credit union client that was housed in the World Trade Center on Sept. 11. It lost nearly everyone and everything on that day, but within a day, it was up and operating at a remote location in New Jersey. Scan your credit union’s internal and external risks in your annual strategic planning. Make sure key risks are identified and considered. Include financial benchmarking in your annual scan. Review your financial reports and projections and compare your position to similarly-situated organizations. Set appropriate financial targets to support your risk tolerance statements, as well as your scenario planning. Once you have reviewed your financial benchmarking data, develop a plan to address any risks therein. Put your plan and reports in writing. Be sure that your perceived risks, opportunities and scenario planning is shared broadly with the board, supervisory or audit committee, and appropriate members of the management team. Update your plan on a regular basis. Be sure to revisit your risk tolerance statement, financial benchmarking, scenario planning and your ERM plan annually. We don’t need to tell you that the environment is changing rapidly, and that means your risks are likely evolving, too. Be sure that you’re on top of them and ready to pivot. It’s fundamental to your responsibilities as leaders of your credit union. Your members are counting on you. Previous Next

< Back Embracing our New (Virtual) Reality Caitlin Hatch May 22, 2020 The new virtual reality is changing the way we do business. I saw an interview recently in which author, American diplomat and former State Department official Richard Haas observed that the COVID-19 pandemic is not so much a turning point for our society, but an accelerant. His comments alluded to the idea that trends only just beginning to emerge before the pandemic, have been “fast-tracked” and their significance amplified as we unlock the ways and means of our new normal. Perhaps the best and most accessible example of this phenomenon is our new fluency in virtual or video conference meetings and even social gatherings. At Quantum, we’ve operated as a virtual organization from the beginning, conducting much of our work via telephone, video conference and the miracle of the Internet. However, an important and transformative element to our work often culminated in traveling to meet clients, sometimes one-on-one but frequently in groups of 20 or more. And the public speaking engagements at conferences to even larger groups…how does that work continue, or does it? As so many of you have, we decided to take a case-by-case approach postponing our in-person retreats and workshops at first but quickly pivoting to 100% virtual via Zoom, Meet, WebEx and the myriad of other apps that have become as familiar to us as centuries-old brands like Kleenex and Clorox. As it happens, we have been in the regular practice of video conferencing with an international nonprofit organization who asked us to conduct individual board orientations with their multi-national Board. We had previously aided them in updating their core governance structures and establishing a better understanding of their core identity and purpose —orientation of their newest directors was the next meaningful step forward. This afforded us a unique opportunity to put into practice a new way of conducting board orientation…100% virtually! In the recently published The State of Credit Union Governance 2020 Report we identified that “a significant number of board members believe their boards must improve their current onboarding process.” Less than half of the directors surveyed for the study felt that they were “using an effective process to orient new board members to the work and dynamics of the board,” with 30% categorizing it as “adequate”— hardly a ringing endorsement. Thus, we developed a virtual board orientation, a solution for boards who struggle with finding enough hours in the day, volunteers to manage the effort, or simply engaging ways to orient new board members effectively and meaningfully. So we “upped our game” so to speak. Doing more video conferencing in particular around board orientation, and we’re creating more recorded video segments and interviews. Check out our Facebook and LinkedIn for the latest and greatest! We upgraded our typical teleconference to a video conference where face-to-face from our own homes has increased the intimacy of our client relationships in a way that would make Getting Naked author Patrick Lencioni proud of both our clients and of us. Caitlin Hatch previously served as a senior consultant with Quantum Governance and has worked with credit unions for the past eight years, focusing on governance and strategic planning. Prior to that, she served for 25 years as general counsel and corporate secretary for the largest anthracite coal company in the United States. Previous Next

< Back Women In Football, Politics And Credit Union Boardrooms Jennie Boden Feb 11, 2021 It’s important to prioritize and value diversity. It’s Super Bowl Sunday as I write this, and it’s snowing at my home in New Hampshire. My husband has made a big batch of his famous mac and cheese, and we have a fire roaring in our wood stove in the ell. (Unless you’re from New England, you won’t know what an ell is, but it’s a great term that means the room that connects the house to your barn. For us, that room has been refinished to a cozy family room.) We’re getting ready to watch Tom Brady (yes, I’m still rooting for him) take on Patrick Mahomes. But the news that I’ve been focused on this week is about the three women who “will be making history” tonight—National Football League referee Sarah Thomas and Tampa Bay Buccaneer assistant coaches Maral Javadifar and Lori Locus. While Tom Brady will be playing in a record 10th Super Bowl, for the first time in NFL history, three women will also be on the field tonight. While the female football ref and coaches made news all week, I also saw an interview with Jocelyne Lamoureux-Davidson and Monique Lamoureux-Morando, two sisters who happen to be Olympic gold medalists in hockey. Aside from continuing to play the sport that they love, they’ve also dedicated their lives to inspiring the next generation of young girls to fight for equality in sports. Asked about tonight’s history-making Super Bowl, one of them said, and I’m paraphrasing here, “We’ll know we’ve made progress when this is no longer a story.” I couldn’t agree more. I mean, don’t get me wrong. I think it’s great that history will be made tonight. Just as I thought it was great that Joe Biden picked Kamala Harris to be his running mate, and she is now our vice president, regardless of the politics. But why does it still have to be history-making? Because it is. I had the same reaction when I was speaking recently with CUES member Deborah Acosta Conder, board chair at $2.5 billion JSC Federal Credit Union , Houston, Texas. Conder was bringing me up-to-speed on some recent appointments that the credit union had made to its board of directors. She shared that under her fresh leadership, and the constructive partnership that she was building with relatively new CEO Brandon Michaels, also a CUES member, she had communicated to the board that the credit union needed a “more diverse board—an expanded board, because the credit union was expanding its own strategic vision.” With an acute focus on diversity, Conder noted that being “a person of color herself,” she had always wanted “the membership to see themselves reflected on the board.” And now, she was in a position to make a difference. Acting with purpose, Conder and her colleagues first identified the core competencies, skills and qualities they wanted in their new board members. Although the legacy of the credit union was proudly and firmly tied to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the team decided to recruit some board members outside of the famous space agency. The group prioritized diversity, individuals with broader experience who had been through mergers and acquisitions, and people with legal and digital strategy experience. And they hit the jackpot. They also changed where and how they recruited board members. Conder called on each of her board colleagues (and we would encourage the inclusion of the CEO in this process too) to explore their own, personal networks. If great, potential candidates for your board are not already members of your credit unions, assuming you have a fairly open charter, they can join! The recruiting team also worked with the local United Way’s Project Blueprint that “trains tomorrow’s nonprofit board leadership, ensuring that Greater Houston’s nonprofit sector reflects the rich diversity of [its] community.” The results? Three new additions to the board who all bring with them not only great diversity but also great competence. One is even a coveted millennial! Michaels agrees with Conder that the credit union will be better for it. A third-generation CEO, following in the footsteps of both his grandmother and his mother, he says that throughout his life, he relied on the perspectives of these two pioneering women: “When I look at boards, I value diversity of thought and experience. We all have various perspectives based on our lives and our journeys, and it is that very diversity of thought that is incredibly important to us in our boardroom because our members are diverse.” New board member Lavonne Burke Hopkins, senior legal director, cybersecurity, product & application security, and Dell Digital for Dell Technologies Inc., joined the JSC FCU board because she believes that there is alignment between her “day job” and the current strategic initiatives being undertaken by the credit union. She was happy to find that board service at the credit union is a perfect way to “marry her experience with her own personal goals of service.” Her new board colleague Dwayne D. Busby serves as the executive director overseeing the mission, goals and overall purpose of strategic partnerships at the University of Houston-Clear Lake. Conder tapped Busby, of course, for his strategic thinking skills, and he is more than happy to provide them. He was honored to be approached by the chair, who is a leader in the community, and he, too, sees board service as a way of giving back to his community, which has done so much for him. His goal? To help determine how the credit union’s strategic plan actually works in Houston’s very diverse community. Lastly, Portia S. Keyes was tapped during this last round of elections too, and the board is lucky to have her. Keyes is a contracting officer at NASA Johnson Space Center. A strong “believer in the power of teamwork,” Keyes joined the board because she, too, believes that “serving the credit union is an extended way of serving her community.” She also volunteers for Fifth Ward GO Neighborhood, a Houston-based initiative dedicated to revitalizing the city’s communities. In The State of Credit Union Governance 2020 , published by Quantum Governance in partnership with CUES and the David and Sharon Center Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance Innovation, we found that demographic diversity was ranked No. 1 among the highest priorities when recruiting new board members among our respondents, but only sixth among those skills that add value in the boardroom. Could it be that everyone is talking about the need for greater diversity in the boardroom, but no one understands why they need it? At JSC FCU, clearly, leaders are both valuing and prioritizing diversity. They, along with all of us at Quantum Governance, would encourage your credit union to do both, too. Previous Next

< Back Get Your House in Order—Now, If Need Be Michael Daigneault and Jennie Boden Aug 30, 2018 There is no ‘wrong’ time to deal with fundamental governance issues. We read with interest a recent article about governance that discussed the importance of boards not addressing their governance issues “in the wrong places at the wrong times.” The authors suggested that many times boards discuss governance issues during precious time in sessions dedicated for other important work—such as strategic planning. They posit that this is distracting and a poor use of time for those taking part and to the goals of the session. They have a point. On one hand, the limited time a board spends together should be treasured– and treated as a resource to be judiciously and appropriately allocated. Strategic planning discussions with management need to happen and are a vital aspect of a board’s role. But on the other hand, if your credit union’s governance challenges are so real that they are clouding your ability to strategize or otherwise effectively lead, there may not be a “wrong” time to deal with them. If governance discussions arise in the context of other discussions, unresolved issues may exist that need to be effectively dealt with ASAP so that governance differences or issues don’t unduly interfere with how you successfully execute your governance roles and responsibilities—strategic planning included! A Need for Conversations on Governance Our recent study, The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018, Five Data-Driven Recommendations for Future Success , found evidence that a good number of credit unions are struggling with governance issues. Of our six key findings , two help tell the story of when to discuss governance: 1. Board members and CEOs frequently differ on their perceptions of governance, with board members and CEOs differing on 84 percent of the survey’s key questions, agreeing on only 16 percent of them (with the exception of the supervisory committee survey section, where more agreement was found). 2. CEOs and senior staff perceive lower levels of trust, with just 27 percent of senior staff and 25 percent of CEOs reporting that their boards were very effective at building a leadership culture of trust, compared to 53 percent of supervisory committee members and 44 percent of board members. We see evidence of these challenges and more in our work with credit unions. Time and time again, we’ll incorporate a strategic and governance assessment and a planning session into one engagement. After all, what could be more strategic than getting your governance house in order? At a recent strategic planning session, a client spent some time in a facilitated executive session, building trust between the board and the CEO. From our point of view, this discussion was probably one of the most important, strategic steps this credit union could take. More and more credit unions are opting to include a strategic goal on governance in their strategic plans. This is not to suggest that you should completely eclipse your normal agendas for all things governance. The article’s authors made some relevant points, and we agree wholeheartedly with most of their recommendations: Dedicated time for governance training is a must. Focus on board member education and governance issues—and to this we would add strategic matters—at every board meeting. Give permission to each other (not just to the CEO or senior staff) to check each other (appropriately) when boundaries are crossed. And as already mentioned, we could support the idea that governance issues not take over every meeting unless the governance issue is so fundamental (i.e., a loss of trust between the board and the CEO; a lack of engagement among board members; critical disagreement on roles and responsibilities, etc.) that it would derail all other discussions or progress. If this is the case, you must have the courage to change course. Agendas are important. Timelines, yes, are meant to be kept. But, remember the saying, “culture will eat strategy for breakfast,” and it’s true. Get your governance house in order. Now’s the right time to do so! Previous Next