< Back 5 Data-Driven Recommendations for Governance Success Michael Daigneault Jan 29, 2018 Core Recommendations from a New Report The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018 is the culmination of five years of data collected from credit unions across the United States and a dream long held by everyone at Quantum Governance. The research yielded a number of key findings which we’ve shared previously on our blog . And now we can also share some data-driven recommendations that emanate from those six key findings. We hope that the information shared by credit union board members, CEOs, supervisory committee members and senior staff nationwide will help you and your credit union colleagues further mission success. You can find the Report here: The State of Credit Union Governance 2018, Report . These five core recommendations may help you strengthen governance policies and practices at your credit union: 1. Prioritize governance excellence at your credit union. If you haven’t been taking governance seriously at your credit union, it’s time to do so. And if you have been, it’s time to kick it up a notch. Whether you’re functioning at Governance 101 or 601, it’s time to find out what Governance 201 or 701 looks like for your credit union. 2. Eliminate any perception gaps between your board, supervisory committee and senior staff. If we know one thing, it’s this: Gaps between the board and senior staff will eventually be destructive. We highly (underscore highly) recommend a strong, constructive partnership between the board, supervisory committee and the senior staff—all working collectively to govern and lead the credit union. There were so many gaps in perceptions between these positions throughout the report that it surprised even us, and it should definitely concern you. 3. Ensure you have a plan for board (and committee) rejuvenation. The longer a board member serves, the more positive his or her perception is. While this may sound like a positive finding, it actually concerns us. Are long-serving board members losing their ability to ask the hard questions? At the same time, the number of potential board members among us—if we look strictly at the census numbers—is shrinking. Ensure that your credit union has a viable plan for leadership continuity. It is one of the most critical responsibilities a board holds. 4. Focus on your credit union’s leadership culture. While you may be spending countless hours ensuring that your board members have the requisite training, your committee structure is in place and operating well, and your plan for board rejuvenation is fully up-to-date, don’t forget about building a positive board culture. It takes time and conscious cultivation to ensure a positive outcome here. 5. Charter a governance and nominations committee… fast . Over the years, nominations committees have morphed—first into board development committees and now into what is considered governance and nominations committees. If your credit union doesn’t have one, it’s behind the curve, and you need to get one. Fast. Today’s governance and nominations committee is chartered to address board roles and responsibilities, composition, knowledge and learning, and effectiveness and leadership. We believe this recommendation is so important that a sample governance and nominations committee charter is an appendix to the report. Previous Next

< Back On Being the Female Chair Leading a Predominately Male Board Gisele Manole Aug 25, 2022 Two female board leaders share their experiences and advice for promoting good governance—especially, but not only, as representatives of a minority demographic. Being in a leadership role—as a credit union board chair, for example—can be lonely at times. Sitting in the chair’s seat certainly puts you in a place of distinction. After all, you have been selected from among your fellow directors to lead them in their leadership role. So, consider the task of leading when you are from a traditionally underrepresented demographic—and say, for the purposes of this conversation, you are a woman leading a predominantly male board. I recently had the chance to connect with two women who shared with me some leadership advice for other women facing just this situation. What they said wasn’t at all what I expected. I anticipated hearing their perspective on having to do it better, faster and smarter than their male counterparts. But instead, their words struck a more nuanced and universal tone that stretched beyond gender differences. Don’t Wait to Be Invited A former CUES board member, Gerrianne “Winky” Burks can count herself among the trailblazers in the industry. After a 40-year career at $4.3 billion Northwest Federal Credit Union , Herndon, Virginia, the last five of which she served as CEO, she currently serves as the board chair. Burks’ advice is this: “Don’t wait to be invited to participate on a board or committee. You may be in the minority as a woman, but you bring a perspective that holds real value. “It’s so different now than when I started out,” Burks observes. “Now there is greater value placed on having a different perspective from the rest of the group. “I followed a male board chair, and frankly, I just did things a little differently than he did,” she adds. “Our communication styles, for example: My meetings may run a little longer, because I really want to hear from everyone in the room. I feel that is important. Neither style is better than the other, and the credit union has benefited from our different styles for many years.” Change Things Just Enough CUES member Janet Burgett Martin, board chair of $625 million Copper State Credit Union in Phoenix, has spent the last two years in the role of chair and recommends changing things up too. “For those new to the board chair position, I highly recommend you change the agenda so that the board understands that there’s new leadership.” Martin shares that she added a “mission moment” at the beginning of board meetings to recognize individual staff accomplishments. “This could be a member letter thanking an employee for excellent service or an award an employee received. It starts our meeting off on a positive note for both the board and staff in attendance.” When faced with assumptions or stereotyping, Martin recommends dealing with those challenges head-on when they first present themselves. Don’t wait to see if the presumption affirms itself, she advises. Find your voice and address it immediately and directly. “In my experience, when you make your expectations clear, presumptions correct themselves quickly. I am very direct but I also lead with compassion and enthusiasm,” she says. Both Burks and Martin stress the notion of being authentic. Burks says that while it may seem obvious, “[The other directors] don’t know what you know. I think that women have gotten much more comfortable in presenting their own thoughts. I pay attention to our board meetings being a place where everyone’s thoughts and ideas are invited.” While Martin encourages all board members to participate to make meetings more productive, she says “[I] always put it upon myself to be prepared by studying the full packet.” Participation requires preparation, and strong leaders model behaviors that they expect from others, she says. Add Your Takeaways to This Starter List As more and more women engage in credit union board service and rise to leadership roles within the industry, their collective learning will continue to grow. Here are some takeaways for developing leaders. Contribute your own advice in the comments section below. Don’t wait to be invited. Share your thoughts and perspectives now! Change things up and be intentional about it. Be authentic and clear in your expectations. And then hold your colleagues to them. Be prepared and model the commitment and behaviors you expect from your colleagues. Previous Next

< Back Taking Action On Credit Unions’ No. 1 Director Recruitment Priority: Diversity. Jennie Boden Sep 21, 2020 The credit union and women’s movements are clearly doing something right. But we still have a long way to go. The day after Kamala Harris was picked by Joe Biden as his running mate, I was talking with a colleague of mine about his choice. I have to note that the colleague in question is a woman, and she is about 10 years younger than me. She was lamenting that everyone in the media was focusing on the fact that Ms. Harris was a woman and, of course, a woman of color. From her point of view, as someone from a younger generation, why should this be the news? She sees Ms. Harris as a qualified, strong candidate for the position, regardless of her sex or ethnicity. In my colleague’s mind, of course she would have been in serious contention for the job. It started me thinking about what my sister would say as someone who is 10 years older than me. She was in college in the ’70s, and I remember her then with long, straight hair, playing sad Joni Mitchell songs on her stereo and challenging my father, the minister, on nearly everything he said. She would bring with her the perspective of history: knowledge of the years when women struggled to have a voice in their marriages, let alone a seat in the boardroom, and of the racial struggles that plagued even my small hometown in rural Pennsylvania when she was in love with an African-American boy in high school. Then my mind moved on to my niece. She is 10 years younger than my colleague . She’s a graduate of Stanford University, recently married to man whose parents immigrated from India, and studying to be a doctor at one of the best medical schools in the country—maybe the world (University of California-San Francisco). Now, at this point, it should be noted that I write from a point of great advantage, and the cast of characters in this article also enjoy great advantages. We all hail from stable families, where shelter, food and love were plenty. We are all well-educated. We are all white. So, what does this have to do with credit unions? And, specifically, with governance, since that’s my area of specialty? My biggest fear in all of the focus on DEI is that it will remain a discussion point and not become a point of action for us all. - Jennie Boden I had two thoughts immediately after the conversation with my colleague and my ensuing reflections about my sister and niece. The first was around the notion of board renewal. We talk about the topic all the time at Quantum Governance, and we’re finding that credit union boards are increasingly talking about it, too. It used to be that credit union board members would join the board and stay for years—for decades, even. I’ve had a client who had two board members who served until they died in their 80s or 90s. Others explained odd behavior by noting that a few of their board members were displaying early signs of dementia. And so, the first rule of board renewal is that you must renew, for the health of your board. It’s the board’s responsibility to ensure that you do. The guiding principle for board renewal is to find a healthy balance of historical continuity and renewal. I celebrate that my colleague just assumes that Kamala Harris is right for the job of vice president and that my niece sees a horizon as wide as possible for herself and all those around her. (And I also imagine what will be available, once they are grown, to my great-nieces.) But, it’s also critical for all of us, as women, to realize from whence we’ve come. My sister’s perspective is valuable, too. She reminded me recently that when she was growing up, girls were shut out completely from sports in high school, and today we have a woman coaching in the NFL. How far we have come, but still, how far we have to go… Ensure that your board is balancing these perspectives—all of them. Historical continuity will give you important points of view on the past, and renewal will open future possibilities the likes of which you’ve never conceived. The second thought that came to mind following the conversation with my colleague arose directly from the research that we published in The State of Credit Union Governance, 2020 report. For the first time ever, we found that demographic diversity was the No. 1 recruiting priority among credit union board members and leaders, surpassing financial literacy for the first time. Source: The State of Credit Union Governance, 2020 We also reported the news that the average credit union boards have nine members, three of which (36%) are women! On its face, this may not seem significant, but it is. In comparison, a 2018 study by Deloitte and The Alliance for Board Diversity of America of Fortune 100 companies found that women held only 25% of their board seats. And in 2018, CUNA found that 52% of credit union CEOs are female, compared to only 5% in commercial banks and 6% in Fortune 500 companies. And it’s not just among the small credit unions: At credit unions with between $1 billion and $3 billion in assets, more than 14% of the CEOs were female, compared to just more than 3% of bank CEOs. As a movement (both a credit union and a women’s movement), we’re clearly doing something right. But we still have a long way to go. It seems that today, everyone is talking about “DEI” or diversity, equity and inclusion. (Note that Quantum Governance believes the appropriate order is “ EDI ,” given that the notion of equity is a broader concept that underlies both diversity and inclusion.) It’s a most worthy discussion, and it’s been a long time coming. My biggest fear in all of the focus on DEI is that it will remain a discussion point and not become a point of action for us all. But clearly, we know how to do this. We’ve started to make true inroads in terms of integrating women into the boardrooms and C-suites of America—at least among our credit unions. Be sure not to let up on that focus. Rather, let’s add to it. While we can celebrate the gains made for women, we’ve not moved the needle one bit on increasing the number of visible minorities in the credit union boardroom or C-suite, and that’s just as important. In fact, remember, demographic diversity is now the No. 1 recruiting priority among credit union board members and leaders. How much richer would your board be if 50% of its members were women? If you had true diversity in terms of ethnic and racial background? In terms of age and tenure? In terms of skills and experience? How much more stirring would the conversations in your boardroom be if you were truly open to listening to everyone’s voices? Previous Next

< Back Moving Beyond The Strategic 'Moment' Michael Daigneault and Jennie Boden Sep 27, 2016 Incorporate strategic planning and thinking into your routine discourse. When more than 30 percent of our clients describe themselves as “less than effective” at something, we sit up and take notice. And that’s exactly how (and how many) of the board members and CEOs we work with describe the challenge of articulating a compelling future vision for their credit unions. Not having a future vision for your credit union is a genuine problem, but one that can be overcome (though not easily, or a third of our clients wouldn’t be struggling with it!). Is your credit union challenged with crafting or updating the foundational components of your overall strategic plan—vision, mission and strategic goals—as well as the more specific strategic objectives and metrics undergirding them? It's worth the struggle to get your future vision right. This is much more than just a convenient tagline or agreeable-sounding statement in your annual report. The conscious or unconscious future vision that a board and senior team hold in their heads has real consequences. Crafting a clear and effective path forward that will truly benefit members is among the most critical and nuanced challenges you will collectively undertake. Yet many boards and executive teams spend less time thinking about the consequential strategic issues facing their credit union than they do on small changes to the loan-loss ratio, car loan volume or even on a single member complaint suggesting that the carpet needs to be replaced in a branch. We recently facilitated the CUES Director Development Seminar in Santa Fe, New Mexico. When we asked the 100-plus attendees who included strategic discussions regularly on their board meeting agendas, one brave soul posited, “Well, we have an agenda item called the ‘strategic moment.’” Though the room spontaneously filled with laughter, the speaker was quite serious, and everyone knew it. Many other attendees may have recognized that by including such a “moment” on the agenda, their colleague was likely well ahead of their own routine meetings typically filled with data-intensive, financial and fiduciary oversight reports. Veteran directors may recall the days when their credit union was just forming and their role was to pour over financial statements, do cash counts and fill the void that a lack of professional staff created. Today the director’s role is quite different. Unless your credit union is very small or in start-up mode, you rely on professional staff to brief you on financial and fiduciary reports. You need to provide effective oversight, hold staff appropriately accountable—and then move effectively to your strategic responsibilities that will help propel your credit union to flourish into the future. In that spirit, we recently developed a list of sample strategic topics for directors to discuss in board meetings, even just for 20-30 minutes. Not all of them are applicable to your situation, but they are the types of questions that can help you regularly exercise your strategic thinking muscles: What criteria would you use in considering—or rejecting—an offer to merge your credit union into a larger one? What types of risks does the evolution of payment systems foreshadow for your credit union? How is your credit union growing? How might you need to grow differently in the future? Even if your credit union is growing, is it genuinely improving members’ financial lives? What would the “ideal” board for the credit union you envision in the future be like? Do you have the right blend of directors for that future? What would the future focus be? What committees would the board have? What type of relationship would it have with your CEO and executive team? What type of relationship would it have with your members and the community? How does your credit union define its risk tolerance or philosophy? Are you too risk-averse? How does your credit union’s risk profile compare to peers? How should you balance ROA, risk and stewardship to members? How do you leverage your cooperative culture into a competitive advantage? Are there other success measures you should be looking at, beyond financial performance? We strongly encourage the board to work hard to fine-tune a strategic plan that includes clear vision and mission statements, strategic goals, objectives and metrics in constructive partnership with your committee leadership, CEO and executive team. After reaching a consensus on the features on the accompanying chart shown in blue, challenge your CEO and executive team to develop their organizational work plans to meet or exceed your agreed-upon strategic goals. But don’t stop there. Include regular and ongoing strategic thinking, discourse and potential changes to your strategic plan, if necessary, in board meetings throughout the year. Insist that your CEO and management team report regularly on the strategic metrics of success as you march toward achieving your strategic goals and objectives. Consider changes in the marketplace or your business environment regularly to assess whether anything needs to be fine-tuned, adjusted or even eliminated. Strategic planning and thinking are continual processes. Off-site sessions annually or every few years may be helpful to recalibrate your leadership’s thinking, but they’re not the end-all. The real work of strategic planning should be a regular feature of the discourse and thinking of the board and executive team—day in and day out, moving beyond the “moment” (though that’s a good start) to become the central focus of your most important deliberations. Previous Next

< Back The State Of Credit Union Governance 2020: A Summary Jennie Boden Apr 2, 2020 For years, we’ve dreamt of studying the state of credit union governance. We know what you’re thinking: Dream bigger. Some people dream of European vacations. Fast cars. Beach houses. But for governance geeks like us, it’s often all about the data. In 2018, we were fortunate to partner with CUES to realize our dream, and The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018 was published. We made some groundbreaking discoveries, like reporting that board members and CEOs frequently differ on their perceptions about governance—and that their perceptions diverge even further based on tenure. We even found that bigger really may be better: Board members and CEOs of CUs with assets of $1 billion or greater had statistically and significantly higher survey scores overall on 18 of the 21 key questions asked concerning matters of governance. And we were satisfied, for a while. But our compendium of data kept growing, and our drive to create more information for you, our colleagues, clients and friends throughout the credit union community, was compelling. Today, we are pleased to announce The State of Credit Union Governance, 2020, which provides updated figures for 2018-2019 and draws on data from the governance assessment of 115 additional credit unions—114 in the U.S. and one based in Jamaica—to enrich the findings from our 2018 report. This year’s report is a collaboration between CUES, Quantum Governance and The David and Sharon Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance and Innovation at the Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto. Our findings are also derived from a supplemental online survey conducted in September 2019 with responses from 320 directors and CEOs across 170 U.S. credit unions. While many of the key findings from 2018 still ring true today (if you haven’t read the 2018 report , we encourage you to begin there), the 2020 report is full of new discoveries that will challenge you and your credit union to new levels of governance excellence. 2020 Key Findings Board Structure and Composition: Demographic diversity was identified as the number one priority for credit union board recruitment (53%). The next highest priority identified when recruiting new members to credit union boards was an ability to focus on the future (51%). (See Figure 1.) Board members continue to think that soft skills, such as an ability to focus on the future (76%) and independent mindedness (66%), are most valuable in the boardroom. Credit union boards are more gender-diverse than their counterparts in other sectors. The average credit union board has nine members, of which three are women (36%) and one is a visible minority (16%). Board Governance: Credit union boards that focus on bolstering their governance tend to adopt a governance committee more readily than those that do not have a concerted focus on good governance. When looking closely at the 1,060 director responses in our sample, we found that directors on the same board would often report very different—and sometimes opposing—perspectives on their board’s effectiveness in four fundamental areas of board renewal: 1) periodic governance assessment; 2) the action plan based on governance assessment outcomes; 3) the director onboarding process; and 4) the frequency of board member renewal. Board Leadership: Survey respondents identified seven important leadership functions for board chairs that fall within two primary categories: 1) establishing processes (e.g., allocating time, setting the agenda, etc.); and 2) working with people (e.g., appointing committee members and chairs). Although most survey participants report that their boards do not limit the number of terms a board chair can serve, we found that more than a third do. Term limits for board chairs can range anywhere from a year to more than 10 years. More than half of the participants whose boards have a term limit in place for their chairs reported limits of less than five years. An impressive 92% of all surveyed board members report that their board is effective at maintaining a good working relationship with their CEO. However, as in the 2018 report, the average board member and CEO differed on how effective they thought their boards were on a range of key governance measures. In 2020, across the 81 surveyed CUs that provided a CEO response, we found that there’s disagreement between the board and CEO regarding the board’s effectiveness on 22 out of 49 survey questions, on average. Credit Union Strategy: We found that 32% of survey respondents do not feel that their board is effective in helping to develop the credit union’s vision, mission and strategy. Most survey respondents say they should slash—by a third—the average time they spend on routine items and operational oversight (i.e., items that do not require debate or can be approved with a single motion as on a consent agenda) and invest an average of 10% more of their time on strategic matters. (See Figure 2.) Decision-Making: Many credit unions have at least one director who says that the board is ineffective at asking hard questions (53%), holding each other accountable (54%) or engaging all members in the work of the board (49%). While directors had misgivings about how decisions are reached, most believe the decisions their boards made were ultimately good, and they could stand by them and speak with one voice. Recommendations Since many of the findings from the 2018 report remain relevant, we encourage you to revisit those recommendations as a baseline; they will serve you well as strong building blocks for any governance program. From there, we would encourage you to consider our newest recommendations from the 2020 report: Board Renewal: Focus on strategic thinking and independent mindedness. Your credit union is a complex financial institution navigating the era of greatest change in the history of the credit union movement. As a result, your board requires meaningful financial literacy, business acumen and specialized skills in such specialties as law, accounting and human resources. However, even boards with the most skilled members will fail to add value without independent mindedness and strategic thinking. Board Diversity: More than ever, credit unions are acknowledging the value of demographic diversity among board members, including gender, race/ethnicity and age. However talking about it as a priority is not enough. To ensure that your board is truly diverse, you will need to be clear in your objectives and work hard at executing them. Once you know the demographic balance you are looking for, you will need a plan to help you find the right people. Board Leadership: Take your board chair position very seriously. Although your CEO is responsible for carrying out your credit union’s strategy on a day-to-day basis, no individual in your credit union has more potential to add value than your board chair. Ensure that you have a robust, concrete job description in place for this important position. Board Governance: Build alignment around what “effective” truly means. It is both normal and constructive for board members to disagree. One might argue that without disagreement there can be no excellent decisions. In too many cases, however, our data highlights boards where one or more directors have assessed the board’s effectiveness at polar opposite ends of the spectrum. Ensure that you are engaging in these types of conversations in the boardroom—what does “effective” really look like for you? Strategic Thinking, Learning and Planning: Invest more time in strategic matters. The most valuable skill identified in credit union boardrooms today is the ability to focus on the future, yet we found that 32% of survey respondents do not feel that their board is effective in helping to develop the credit union’s vision, mission and strategy. Ensure that your board is doing everything it can to be effective in this fundamental role and responsibility. Previous Next

< Back The Origin Of Civility Michael Daigneault Mar 22, 2016 Be sure to disagree in an agreeable way. I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the word civility. And unless you live under a rock, you can likely understand why . Frankly there’s a significant lack of it in the public sector. It concerns me, and my guess is that it concerns you, no matter what your party affiliation. What does this lack of civility mean for us as a country? For how we will govern ourselves in the future? What lessons are we teaching our children? What lessons are we learning ourselves? Surprisingly enough, this same word – civility – has been surfacing more and more as we think about our work with credit unions and others in the nonprofit sector. Because I’m a life-long learner, I decided to take myself back to school on the notion of civility itself. The word’s origins stretch back to the late 14th century, when the French used the word “civilite” to denote the “status of a citizen,” and the English translated the word as “courtesy.” But it is the Latin derivative of the word that surprised and delighted me the most – “civitatem” was defined as both “the art of governing” and “courteousness.” Isn’t that perfect? Isn’t that what we all need on our boards – a little more focus on the “art of governing” and more “courteousness?” I won’t bore you with a long list of boards behaving badly, but I would like to share with you a few examples that we’ve experienced recently. We’ve: seen board members texting each other, under the table, in the middle of board meetings; interviewed board members who said they felt like they “had a target on their back”; witnessed others interrupting their colleagues and shouting to get their points across during the middle of meetings; and heard staff describe conversations where board members are approaching them to get the “dirt” on their CEO’s performance. I’m not suggesting behavior like this is rampant or that it exists on all boards, nor am I suggesting that a normal amount of give and take, or even conflict on a board isn’t healthy. It is. In fact, boards that experience absolutely no conflict, or those that are in complete harmony, are just as dysfunctional as boards that are always in conflict (see the graphic at the beginning of this article). There is a balance. Just like in a good marriage, an appropriate degree of conflict is necessary. You just need to be sure that you’re disagreeing in an agreeable way. But even if your board is the healthiest board in the world, our research indicates that there is still room for improvement…for greater civility…to sharpen your focus on the “art of governance.” One in five board members that we surveyed for the 2016 Quantum Governance Compendium reported that their board is doing a less-than-effective job at building a leadership culture of trust, and that same survey reports that less than 25 percent said that they are very effective at asking the hard questions that need to be asked. So, then, what does that mean? Look around you. One in five of your colleagues isn’t feeling the love; a high level of trust is not resonating at the board level. And only one in four of your colleagues thinks that you’re asking the right questions in the boardroom. I know. This post sounds like it’s full of doom and gloom. That certainly wasn’t my intent. But it is a wake-up call. Increase the civility in your boardroom – in the Latin sense of the word. Be more courteous. Sharpen your focus on the “art of governance,” while you push yourselves to have the hard conversations that leading a credit union in today’s competitive environment demands. I am not suggesting that you practice the “art of governance” at the risk of foregoing your responsibilities as a board member or that you should stifle your dissenting opinions to keep the peace. The “art of governance” is not about being nice and passive in your boardrooms. But, don’t confuse strong leadership with being discourteous, unprofessional or disrespectful. The true art of governance is about being in the middle of the bell curve, with a good and healthy balance of open and challenging discourse in an environment where everyone plays respectfully in the proverbial sandbox. Previous Next

< Back Assessing Staff's Strategic Planning Path Jennie Boden Aug 2, 2017 The challenge is helping front-line credit union folks see the big picture. Should credit union staff members beyond the senior level be included in strategic planning? If yes, when and how will such involvement be most beneficial for a credit union? The diagram at right will help you consider the answer to this question. The board and senior management team should work in constructive partnership to set the credit union’s overarching vision, mission, culture (or values), strategic goals, objectives and metrics (see the items in the accompanying graphic in blue). Work plans (see items in red) are then developed and executed by the senior management team in partnership with the rest of the staff, based on the original work set forth on the vision, mission and culture. There are a few caveats, of course. The senior management team should be recused from some parts of the strategic planning process with the board when (a) the board anticipates that it may need to make a CEO change and wants to discuss it as a part of going in a “new strategic direction”; (b) the board discusses the possibility of restructuring the senior management team with just the CEO; and/or (c) there are important governance issues concerning the board, which could morph into a strategic effort focused on the board or governance-only issues, that they want to first discuss among themselves and (usually) with the CEO. Figure 1: Strategic Planning Elements Including more staff in the visioning process can, at times, be limiting, so the board and senior management team should consider whether this might be an issue. Staff can tend to think more along operational lines, and the purpose of strategic planning at the board and senior management team level is to think, to think big, and to think beyond what is happening today. However, some staff, especially individuals with specialized skill sets and knowledge, could be included at the board and senior management team level of planning, and all staff can and should be included in up-front brainstorming, research and data gathering. Additionally, they are vital to fully developing the more detailed operational work plans (the items in orange) that flow from the board-level strategic goals, objectives and metrics. Finally, they would need to be involved as a vital stakeholder group in the communications effort articulating the strategic planning efforts of leadership. After all, they will be asked to embrace and execute the plan. Previous Next

< Back Balancing Impartiality With Voting Michael Daigneault and Caitlin Hatch Apr 1, 2019 A best practice for chairs is to help the board look at the big picture while still having a specific opinion. At the September 2018 Board Chair Development Seminar , we asked the more than 60 attendees from all over the United States and Canada to share with us whether their board chairs voted on regular matters. By a show of hands, a slight majority of the attendees said their chairs do not regularly vote during board meetings—except to break ties. In fact, one leader indicated that his CU had placed this prohibition against voting by the chair—except in the case of ties—into its governance policy. A number of chairs were quite passionate about refraining from board votes. Their passion appeared to flow from a strong desire to ensure that they not exert any undue influence over their colleagues on the board. For others, the abstinence (unless in the case of a tie) was a strong belief that the practice supported key values of a chair’s impartiality, as well as his or her primary role as a fair and balanced facilitator of board processes rather than a participant in them. Another attendee suggested that his CU’s current practice was based on Robert’s Rules of Order, a widely used reference for meeting procedure and business rules in the English-speaking world. What Does Robert’s Rules Say? While most leaders of credit unions that use Robert’s Rules believe they understand them, few have genuinely studied them. That is because the guidelines in the book are amazingly complex and intended to be a reference book for “an answer to any question of parliamentary procedure that may be met with,” according to one of the many editions, Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised in Brief . Even the Robert’s Rules Association admits the overload of information in the guide: “At least 80 percent of the content [of the most recent version] will be needed less than 20 percent of the time.” Notably, the position of Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised in Brief on board chairs voting is clear. They can vote on all matters coming to the board: “If the President [Robert’s Rules also explicitly recognizes “Chairs” to be the same as “Presidents”] is a member of the voting body, he or she has exactly the same rights and privileges as all other members have, including the right to make motions, to speak in debate, and to vote on all questions. So, in meetings of a small Board (where there are not more than a dozen Board members present), and in meetings of a committee, the presiding officer may exercise these rights and privileges as fully as any other member.” We agree that chairs should not “unduly influence” their colleagues, but simply voting on board matters does not constitute undue influence. Impartiality is also important for chairs as they facilitate board meetings. But, let’s be clear about what impartiality really means. Elect individuals to the role of chair who can be fair, objective facilitators. … If you are concerned about undue influence, consider casting votes privately to limit the influence of the chair. Merriam-Webster states that “partial to” or “partial toward” someone or something is to be somewhat biased or prejudiced, which means that a person who is partial really only sees part of the whole picture. Thus, to be impartial is to try to see “the whole picture.” To allow everyone to see the whole picture, it is incumbent upon your credit union’s board chair to remain unbiased, fair and unprejudiced in his or her facilitation of the meeting. This doesn’t mean that at the end of the dialogue, your chair isn’t also a full-fledged member of the board with his or her own beliefs, perspectives and ideas. So, how then do you reconcile the board chair voting and maintaining his or her impartiality? The answer lies in the important difference between the actual content of the matters being discussed and the impartiality and fairness of the facilitation process utilized to transparently discuss the content. As such, a board chair’s impartiality isn’t about him or her not having a personal opinion, it’s about him or her not wielding authority in a biased, unfair or prejudiced manner that only forwards his or her own perspective. A board chair has one vote like each and every one of his or her colleagues (except, like all of the other members of the board, in the obvious case of a personal conflict of interest or when there is insufficient information to make an informed decision), but we would be naïve to suggest that the chair position carries with it no persuasive influence. Accordingly, he or she must work diligently to facilitate the board meeting (or voting process) in a way that allows all voices to be genuinely heard, whether or not they agree with the majority’s—or chair’s—point of view. Remember to be careful out there … the mark of a true leader is the capacity and will to rally other people to a common purpose and a character that inspires confidence and trust. It’s the ability of a leader (such as a chair) to inspire followership over the long haul. It’s not that a chair must ensure that everyone falls “into line” behind a single, unanimous vote, and it’s certainly not the ability to ensure that everyone on the board always votes in agreement with the chair. Ultimately, it’s the ability of a chair to be both an effective board member—with his or her own thoughts and opinions—while simultaneously, fairly and impartially facilitating an appropriate discussion. That is one mark of a truly great board chair. Steps to Consider Taking So, what can you do to balance your chair’s right (and fiduciary duty) to vote with the need to maintain impartiality and encourage open dialogue? Consider the following: Elect individuals to the role of chair who can be fair, objective facilitators. This may be easier said than done. But it’s important. Many credit unions have simply adopted a rolling officer succession plan. Don’t. Be thoughtful about who you put into such leadership positions as the chair. Ask the chair to share his/her thoughts at the close of the discussion, not at the beginning. This may take some diligence on the part of the chair. But it can be done, and once it is done regularly, it can and should become part of your credit union’s meeting culture. It is often a good practice for the chair to also try to fairly summarize the key points of the dialogue before a vote is taken—particularly if it has been an extended discussion. If you are concerned about undue influence, consider casting votes privately to limit the influence of the chair—as well as any other board members. If the vote is not a private ballot, the chair’s vote should be rendered last. Again, board meeting cultures can change. It might take time, but if your chair hasn’t been casting a vote, a shifting of this type may be easier to make than you think. Caitlin Hatch previously served as a senior consultant with Quantum Governance and has worked with credit unions for the past eight years, focusing on governance and strategic planning. Prior to that, she served for 25 years as general counsel and corporate secretary for the largest anthracite coal company in the United States. Previous Next

< Back Some New Remote 'Norms' Are Here To Stay Michael Daigneault and Gisele Manole Aug 25, 2020 Five tips for a successful pivot to virtual board meetings At a recent credit union board retreat, we asked the group (a mix of board members and executive leadership); “How do you think the post-COVID-19 world will be different from the pre-COVID-19 world?” The answers were varied and included: More of the workforce will work remotely Better overall hygiene practices Less brick-and-mortar retail and other traditional storefront businesses Increased consolidation of the credit union field Fewer major airlines and fewer travelers We ask this question because, as they say, “the genie is out of the bottle” on so many of our new norms and behaviors. Our businesses and our culture have made a sharp turn to adapt to new laws about social distancing—a foreign concept just a few months ago. This pandemic has accelerated our transition into the digital realm. Which of the changes that we have made are likely to stick? Which ones should we adapt to craft the “new normal”? Perhaps the most immediate change our boards have had to make is switching to virtual meetings. So many boards are asking us and themselves if and how can they effectively and meaningfully conduct their work virtually? Quantum has had to make some changes along these same lines. While the majority of our work is conducted remotely, our facilitated retreats, often considered the pivotal “aha!” moment for many of our clients, had to be reinvented as virtual experiences. It was a daunting challenge but one that we attacked as a team composed of different strengths, talents and experiences. Some of us are more confident with new technologies than others. And then there was a sense of mourning for the loss of our in-person retreats. We had invested so much of ourselves over eight long years and hundreds of thousands of miles to fine-tuning our practices. Who are we without our flip charts, big stickies and colorful illustrations? How did we pivot? We practiced … a lot! We spent countless hours choreographing and rehearsing for our first virtual retreat. It is safe to say that we have successfully pivoted now that a number of our clients have commented, “I think this was actually a much better format for our retreat. We were so focused and got so much accomplished in a shorter period of time!” And, “This (virtual retreat) raised the board’s governance IQ but also our video conferencing and communication skills which will make us stronger, too.” Here are a few best practices that this short and intense period of adjustment has taught us about teamwork and conducting successful virtual meetings: While we are limited to only a virtual meeting format, make it the best possible experience. Be present just as you would be if you were seated in the same room with your colleagues. Make sure your video is on, that your face is well lit, that your sound is strong with no background noise or distractions, and that you are knowledgeable about how to use whichever conferencing platform you are using, such as Zoom or Google Meet. Come prepared in every other way and review in advance the board materials you were provided in advance. It may seem like common sense, but many board members still treat virtual meetings like “board meeting light,” as if they are in a holding pattern until they can meet in person again. This experience of continuing to operate and indeed grow your organization in a pandemic has likely already provided you with opportunities to conduct vital business and make board-level decisions remotely. If it hasn’t already, it will. Your loyalty to the mission of your credit union and your responsibilities as board members are the same today as they were in the pre-COVID-19 world. Have a focused agenda and aim to keep your virtual meetings to about 90 minutes. (We think two hours is the max.) Participation can fall off a cliff if a video conference goes on too long ... we have all been there! Consider meeting for more than one session if you need more than 90 minutes. Keep your agenda tight while leaving room for strategic discussion. It is a delicate balance and requires excellent meeting facilitation by the chair and active participation by the rest of the board. Use all of the tools available to you on whichever video conferencing platform you use , including “breakout rooms” for small groups and strategic discussions, “polling” (which is a great way to efficiently get a Five-Finger Consensus ) and the “chat” feature (which, used appropriately, is a great way to take the pulse of your entire group in record time.) Remember that teamwork is essential. Everyone has to be “all in” on the virtual experience and 100% committed to your meeting’s purpose. The pandemic crisis has been a gut check for leaders in the credit union community. Having a deep bench of various talents, experiences and cultures has never been more important. Perhaps nothing is a complete substitute for “breaking bread” and the ways that in-person meetings, practices and rituals build community and culture. However, think about how a hybrid model of virtual meetings (when done well) and in-person meetings (with social distancing, masks and hand sanitizer) can help you to expand the reach of your board recruitment and diversify your membership. As we continue to adjust to the post-COVID-19 “new normal,” the most important lesson is to remain nimble; don’t be afraid to try new things and accept that experimentation will lead to some failures, but ultimately to success as well. Previous Next

< Back A Matter of Culture Michael Daigneault Apr 1, 2014 What drives yours? Here are 10 elements to shoot for in your board room. I ask credit union leaders a lot of questions… Indeed, asking questions is one of the best things effective consultants do. Some of my questions have proved fairly easy to answer; some, much more difficult. In recent years, one of the most challenging questions for many credit union CEOs and board leaders has been: “What type of organizational culture are you trying to foster at your credit union?” The difficulty in answering this question has led me to ask a second question, which has proved even more vexing: “What type of leadership or governance culture are you trying to foster at your credit union?” I have tried to discover what makes it is such a challenge for leaders to answer to these fundamental questions—particularly at the CEO and board levels. Perhaps the notion of organizational or leadership culture is something they haven’t had the chance to think a great deal about? Perhaps they have been focused on other things—like survival, economic shifts, new regulations or financial ratios? Maybe culture is something credit union leaders simply accept as-is—or take for granted? Maybe the very notion of organizational culture—as applied to a credit union or its governance—is confusing and needs to be clarified? (It is a fairly new construct, dating back perhaps just a few decades.) Or maybe it is all of the above? Uncovering why it is so difficult to answer the “governance culture question” has taken me on a recent quest to figure out what organizational culture is at a deeper level—and to try to better understand why many experts feel culture is so important to organizational success. For example, in 2010 organizational culture guru Edgar Schein warned that “cultural understanding is desirable for all of us, but it is essential to leaders if they are to lead.” Jim Dougherty wrote in a 2014 Harvard Business Review article that “company culture is part of your business model,” and “the single most important attribute to successful companies.” If these experts are right—and culture is somehow central to success—then we should try to uncover the hurdles CU leaders face in understanding, articulating and building the culture of their institutions. In particular, we should try to identify and overcome any leadership and governance culture challenges leaders may face. What is ‘Organizational Culture?’ Every credit union has a culture. Just what that culture is can be hard for its leaders to describe—even if they have been with the credit union for a long time. Although long-tenured board members often feel they understand their CU well, they are frequently too close to it to really take a step back and identify the unconscious beliefs and assumptions that have been guiding their decision-making. It is, as such, a real challenge for board leaders to really see their own organizational culture. This can be the case concerning the CU overall (where leaders do not always have the kind of institutional access to pick up key cultural cues) and at the governance level (where leaders may be too personally involved to identify the underlying assumptions with any degree of objectivity). In his book Organizational Culture and Leadership , Edgar Schein formulates a formal definition of organizational culture, the essence of which is this: “what a group learns over a period of time as it solves its problems of survival in an external environment and its problems of internal integration.’ This leads us then to a new pair of questions you should yourself ask about your credit union: How much is your organizational culture simply an unconscious by-product of your founders’ or key leaders’ leadership style? And, on the other side of the coin: How much is your organizational culture the result of a conscious attempt to shape its values and assumptions? This last question brings us to look deeper into how credit union leaders can work together to improve their organizational and leadership culture. How Do Leaders Create or Change Culture? If you have been trying to make changes in how your organization works, you need to find out how the existing culture helps or hinders you. Accordingly, you need to determine what assumptions operate within the existing culture. Schein groups assumptions into three basic levels: 1) artifacts—all of the surface things you would first observe, see, hear or feel when you encounter an organization; 2) stated beliefs and values; and 3) basic underlying assumptions—the unconscious, taken-for-granted beliefs and values of the group. In 1983, Schein wrote that when organizations first form, there are usually dominant figures or “founders” whose own beliefs, values and assumptions provide a visible and articulated model for how the group should be structured and how it should function. As these beliefs are put into practice, some work out and some do not. The group learns what parts of the founder’s belief system work and which should be left behind. This learning gradually creates shared assumptions. Founders and subsequent leaders continue to attempt to embed their own assumptions, but increasingly they find that other parts of the organization have their own experiences to draw on and, thus, cannot be changed. Increasingly the learning process is shared, and the resulting cultural assumptions reflect the total group’s experience, not only the leader’s initial assumptions. But leaders continue to try to embed their own views of how things should be and, if they are powerful enough, continue to have a dominant effect on the emerging culture. Board members need to be able to take a step back and reflect on how your organization either challenges (or doesn’t) these assumptions. Be aware that your response will be tainted by your own influence on the culture you have helped to build. This is where an unbiased third party who can remain objective and observe your board’s dynamics may be helpful. If you are trying to examine (or change) your governance culture, you may also find yourself fighting against the organization’s design and structure; organizational systems and procedures; the design of physical space, facades and buildings; stories, legends, myths and symbols; and formal statements of organizational philosophy, creeds and charters. Changing culture can be difficult, particularly because sometimes culture can act as a protective mechanism, with each existing assumption working to reinforce and support the other. If you try to change one assumption in isolation, the others will push back to reinforce the status quo. Assumptions are also driven by the individuals or groups who have influence within the organization. If you want to change the culture, you sometimes have to foster a culture change within your organization’s current leaders, or modify the organization’s core governance philosophy as well as its policies and procedures. While often the most effective, changing the behavior of key leaders can be so hard that modifying the core governance philosophy is often the best opening move. When all else fails, a change in personnel may be required. But there is hope. Change can happen. It takes a focused effort and commitment to the following types of primary mechanisms: what leaders pay attention to, measure and control; how leaders react to critical incidents and organizational crises; deliberate role modeling and coaching; operational criteria for the allocation of rewards and status; and operational criteria for recruitment, selection, promotion, retirement and expulsion. 10 Elements of an Effective Culture Once you and your colleagues—both the board and the senior staff leaders–have effectively recognized and thoughtfully discussed the underlying assumptions driving your current credit union leadership culture, you can turn your attention to identifying any weaknesses or gaps and shape a more effective leadership culture for the future. I challenge you to address each of the following 10 key elements to build an effective board culture for your credit union. 1. Commit to a culture of engagement. Nothing really improves unless the board and senior staff are actively engaged in the process. This means leaders have to do more than just attend monthly meetings and listen. It means they have to do their homework, and be genuinely prepared. It means they have to show up and actively engage in discussions. That way, they can co-create with senior management the future of their credit union. It’s the responsibility of senior staff leaders and all board members to be familiar with the credit union’s key programs and strategic initiatives. It’s also the responsibility of leadership to work together to improve them. To do so, you must be engaged. 2. Join with management to foster a culture of teamwork. There is a lot of literature in the business world on the importance of teamwork, but seldom is it applied directly to boards. Taking a page from Management 101, you and your colleagues must join together to foster a culture of teamwork. And not just among yourselves—be sure to include members of your credit union’s senior leadership. Who else will work with you, shoulder to shoulder, during times of challenge? Evaluate opportunities with you? Celebrate the successes with you? Share the burdens? 3. Build a culture of curiosity. Socrates was recognized by Oracle at Delphi as one of the wisest men on earth because he was a genuinely curious man who was open about what he knew and—perhaps more importantly—what he did not know. Bring your own humility to the board room. Come with an open mind and learn from both your board and senior staff colleagues. Curiosity is one of the most important attributes a director—and a board as a whole—can have. 4. If you are able to develop a culture of curiosity , you’ll likely also foster a culture of learning. You and your colleagues will bring to the table your own personal curiosities and, combined together, you will move in the direction of what Peter Senge, a leading 21st century management theorist, has called a “learning organization.” Indeed, you can then begin to look at board room (and many committee meeting) experiences not through the lens of “necessary data exchange,” but the lens of “collective learning.” Culture is a learned experience and learning models should help us to better understand culture creation and change. 5. To support your learning, you and your colleagues will need to foster a culture of inquiry. You will need to revise the very nature of your board meetings so they encourage a genuine dialogue and exchange of ideas, a culture in which great questions are recognized and appreciated. Gone should be the days of stale committee reports or—worse yet—committee reports that simply mirror the written briefing materials. 6. All this communication requires that CU leaders maintain a sincere culture of respect. Respect does not mean agreeing to everything anyone else suggests. It does not simply mean being “nice.” It does mean deeply listening to—and honoring—other leaders’ voices in the process of decision-making. It also means valuing others’ contributions and knowing the boundaries of the role you each are carrying out. 7. Be mindful that you have all committed your time, talents and expertise to the CU board for the same reason—to be of service. Focus on that commitment. Build a culture of service, remembering that the roots of the CU movement are deep. For more than 100 years, credit unions have been providing quality financial services to their members. Above all else, we are driven as a movement by our commitment to cooperative principles. Voluntary and open membership, member economic participation and rewards are at least as—or more important than—the bottom line. 8. Because you are stewards of other people’s funds and have committed to a culture of service, you and your colleagues should—and will—be held to a very high standard. You will need to, therefore, build a strong culture of diligence. Some components of this part of your culture will be informal. Together you and your colleagues will determine mutually agreed-upon standards and expectations for how you will act and govern the CU. Other, more formal standards will be imposed upon your CU by regulators. In either case, you and your colleagues must pledge that together you will be eternally vigilant on both the formal and the informal standards guiding your decisions and actions. 9. As stewards of other people’s funds, and because as a CU you are committed not only to a culture of service but also to cooperative principles, you must commit to a culture of accountability. Of course, you must hold each other accountable and, clearly, accountability extends to your credit union’s CEO and, ultimately, the staff. You must model a culture of respect from the top-down, the same way you must model accountability. 10. Ultimately what every organization wants to build is a culture of trust. You want a trusting relationship with your members, your staff, your regulators and with the public. It’s the right thing to do and can only benefit your business bottom line as well. In all, building a culture that breeds success for your CU will not be an easy journey, but is certainly one that’s worthy of the effort. Challenge your organization’s long-held assumptions. Commit yourself. Be engaged. Ask your questions. Leave your ego at the door. Respect one another. Hold each other accountable. And do the right thing. Having done so, you will earn the trust that your members place in your leadership! Previous Next

< Back Creating a 'Wow' Credit Union Board Meeting Michael Daigneault Aug 24, 2014 How to Take Your Meetings to the Next Level Consider a typical board meeting. There is a call to order, some chairman and CEO remarks, committee reports, a call for old and new business, then adjournment. Did you ever realize a vast majority of what is said aloud in the meeting is exactly the same information provided in written form, begging the question: Was that a "board" meeting or a "bored" meeting? As financial services have evolved from a staid, conservative industry to a highly competitive sales and service focused marketplace, the conversations happening in the boardroom have not experienced a parallel transformation. As I work with credit unions, I challenge them to ask themselves: Are we addressing the right questions in the board room? If you answered no, the board might be stuck at the dysfunctional or functional level of governance. How should we think or act differently? A new approach can help the board evolve to the responsible or exceptional level of governance. Here is my vision for leaving routinized (unconscious) meetings behind and evolving to "wow" (enlightened) meetings: Old New Top-down information exchange Dialogue and interaction Focus on data and past results Focus on thinking and future initiatives Approval of numerous administrative items Consolidated consent agenda Oversight and review Imagining and innovating One key component is the consent agenda. Instead of listening to a series of operational and financial reports, board members are expected to read a packet of information prior to the meeting and come prepared to approve numerous items with one concise motion. This frees up the agenda to focus on planning and strategy discussions. Safety and soundness will always be a priority, but while the fiduciary role of the board is still necessary , it is no longer sufficient to lead a credit union. As with most changes, the trick is in the transition from old to new. As you move toward this new model, some people will adapt quickly while others may find it difficult to leave their comfort zones. One excellent resource I’ve found helpful over the years is a book by William Bridges called “Transitions: Making Sense of Life’s Changes” and its companion “Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change.” Credit union leaders that have the courage to forge ahead will benefit by having a productive, engaged and focused board, creating boundless opportunities for the future. Previous Next

< Back More Listening, Less Mansplaining Jennie Boden Mar 22, 2022 In the boardroom and everywhere, it's important to hear all voices. I was recently facilitating a retreat for one of our credit union clients when one of the board members—a male board member—started going toe-to-toe with me on the subject of good governance. Really? I thought to myself. Okay, let’s go . I’ve been a professional in the national not-for-profit sector, focusing on governance, strategy and C-suite management issues, for almost 30 years. And I’ve been working specifically in the area of credit union governance for almost a decade. I’ve probably interviewed more credit union board members than, well, most everyone, and I’m an author of The State of Credit Union Governance studies published by CUES and Quantum Governance. I help assess and review governance data from 50 or 60 credit unions every year … every year . Now, I’m not trying to boast. But I am saying that I know my way around a discussion on credit union governance. Apparently, however, my male client knew more. The term mansplaining is relatively new—it first appeared in a Los Angeles Times piece in 2008—but the concept, of course, is not. The phenomenon of mansplaining is so common that it even now appears in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary and is officially defined as “when a man talks condescendingly to someone (especially a woman) about something he has incomplete knowledge of, with the mistaken assumption that he knows more about it than the person he’s talking to does.” For many women, mansplaining is a frustrating, recurring part of their professional lives, regardless of their position or tenure. While some may be tempted to call mansplaining a mere annoyance—or invoke gendered stereotypes that women are “too sensitive”—the impact of mansplaining behavior goes much deeper than words. In the boardroom, it can be a clear signal that a board member’s expertise is discounted and, according to the Society for Human Resources Management , it can even affect the way board members are nominated and selected for committees or leadership roles. Mansplaining in the Credit Union Boardroom So, why is this particularly relevant among credit unions? We know that credit unions have made significant progress in diversifying their boardrooms, especially as compared to other sectors: 36% of credit union board members are women, whereas women hold only 25% of board seats in Fortune 100 companies, according to a 2018 report by Deloitte and The Alliance for Board Diversity of America. Yet, even at 36%, women are still significantly underrepresented in our credit union boardrooms, which remain male- (and white-) dominated spaces. Much more work remains to be done to improve gender diversity in the boardroom to ensure that boards truly reflect the communities they serve. As most women know, mansplaining happens everywhere: It begins on the playground and carries through to the boardroom. But it doesn’t stop there. In fact, the concept of mansplaining is so universal that in 2016, a union in Sweden temporarily set up a hotline for workers to report incidents of mansplaining and seek counsel from professors, authors and other gender experts on strategies for dealing with this condescending behavior! Even the BBC offers a flow chart to help readers identify mansplaining even when they may not realize it’s happening to them! As we encourage boards to reflect on and improve their own diversity, we know that many credit unions will recruit new directors who don’t necessarily have banking or accounting backgrounds, but who are bright, driven leaders in their fields. They are strategic thinkers who are ready to learn more about what the credit union does. This diversity—both in terms of gender and racial background and also professional expertise—undoubtedly helps advance a credit union’s service to its members not only by ensuring a strong “ear to the ground” but also by deliberately crafting a leadership group that brings diverse experiences, skills and viewpoints all to strengthen the decisions made in the boardroom. Board members with prior sector experience will, naturally, lead in helping their new colleagues develop a greater understanding of the credit union and their responsibilities as board members. In fact, we encourage it. In offering guidance, however, it’s important to remember that your support should be offered in a way that’s conducive to learning and recognizes your new colleagues’ own talents and expertise versus sharing your own knowledge in a way that is condescending, meant to intimidate and discredit. Board members of all tenures and backgrounds should approach their role with what David Smith , an associate professor of practice at the Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, calls “healthy doses of humility and a learning orientation.” Smith also notes that a “prove it again” bias that women often experience “questions their competency by having them continually prove that they have the experience and ability to perform. Most men do not experience this bias as it is usually assumed that they are competent, and they are advanced more often on potential.” While this observation is based on his experience in the U.S. Navy, a credit union boardroom—a similarly male-dominated space—can also encourage these dynamics. How to Move Past Mansplaining How do we recognize and move past the mansplaining we observe in the boardroom? Smith’s research found that what women most appreciated in male mentors and allies was their capacity to listen—which Smith summarizes as “generous listening with an intent to understand and not fix her or fix her problem.” Recognizing the root impulse for this is also important: “As it turns out, many of us as leaders are socialized to be problem-solvers. We listen to a colleague until we discern the problem and then tell them how to fix it.” (Read more on this from Smith in “ More Listening, Less ‘Mansplaining’ Make Men Better Allies to Women Co-Workers .”) In the credit union boardroom, where we find various levels of expertise in accounting or banking, but a steadfast desire to learn, this is equally important for male colleagues to internalize. What are some other key strategies for creating inclusive, welcoming, and respectful spaces? Arin N. Reeves, Ph.D., of the University of Michigan offers a few suggestions : Create and use agendas for meetings to define intentions, decrease interruptions and offer clarity on who should be speaking and why. Adopt a “take turns” approach in meetings; it will provide additional structure around who should be speaking and offer all participants an opportunity to give their perspective. Separate “divergent thinking” (unstructured brainstorming and idea generation) from “convergent thinking” (idea analysis and decision-making) to prevent unwanted interruptions and allow for women’s voices to be included as an active part of the leadership and decision-making process. Speak up! We can all recognize the symptoms of “mansplaining,” and if we can respectfully call out and encourage reflection about this behavior, we can create more respectful, productive and effective board and committee meetings. We all know that there are challenges to recruiting board members. Don’t make the mistake of not fully appreciating or realizing the full potential of your board members by silencing those voices that will help to further the vision and mission of your organization. Previous Next