Search Results

< Back When It Comes to Board Meetings... Michael Daigneault Jan 27, 2015 We can do better. For more years than I sometimes care to admit, I’ve traveled the country consulting with credit union boards of directors and CEOs. One of the questions that frequently arises in our discussions is: How can we make our board meetings better? Better is certainly an aspirational – but also amazingly ambiguous – term. I’ve learned it can mean remarkably different things to different credit union leaders. For example, in the context of board meetings, I have been told better means: more strategic discussions, shorter meetings, a more engaging experience, an opportunity to hear everyone’s voice, more efficient meetings, fewer – but longer – meetings, meetings that produce more effective decisions, a more robust accountability culture, meetings giving clearer direction to staff and meetings producing greater consensus. These are all well intended, but also all over the map! It makes me wonder what’s really happening at many monthly credit union board meetings? Is this what the agenda looks like at your credit union’s board meeting? The chair calls the meeting to order and offers a brief set of general remarks or report. There’s then a CEO report, often followed by financial, staff and committee reports. There’s little time for genuine dialogue or discussion. Indeed, the agenda is often centered on telling the board various types of information – reinforcing the board’s role as overseers or fiduciaries. Old School Meetings Historically, most credit union board meetings have largely emphasized the board’s formal role. A routine (even rote) agenda has been frequently use to move efficiently (often thought of as “quickly”) from one report, informational item or policy issue to another. Board members were on hand to receive information or data, provide the required fiduciary oversight and make quick or final decisions when necessary. Many such decisions tended to be made immediately or even in advance of the board meeting. Tough questions – or even meaningful dialogue – were often viewed as hindering or even obstructing the meeting. In today’s credit union environment, however, this board meeting paradigm does not work particularly well. I often wonder if a critical mass of credit union boards even know they’re likely stuck in an outdated way of conducting their meetings? Why do I ask? Because the board meeting of the future looks remarkably different from the board meeting of the past. New School Meetings Yes, the chair still opens the meeting and offers some remarks, but now he or she notes unique elements for the meeting’s success. It’s the chair’s responsibility to help his or her colleagues focus, and set a tone that invites meaningful exchange. Such items as routine reports, informational items, administrative changes, minor alterations to policy and the like can often be included in a “ consent agenda ” and approved with a simple vote. Likewise, a thoughtful dashboard presented by the CEO can be used to efficiently and effectively highlight the critical indicators of your credit union’s efforts. After asking any needed clarification questions of the CEO or senior team, you and your director colleagues are then able to transition to the other central agenda items for the day: one or more strategic or educational discussions designed to help your credit union move forward. What would the members of your board do if, aside from the chair’s remarks, a consent agenda and an effective dashboard review, there was a significant strategic question posed for consideration and discussion, and you had more than an hour in which to really discuss it? How do you think your board colleagues would respond to such an experiment? Would they be open to the possibility or change? I strongly suggest you consider evolving your board agendas from emphasizing the formal role of your board to focusing on the board’s influential and persuasive role as well. Vary the agenda items and include open spaces for dialogue and deliberation where questions can be posed and collective learning can take place. Chairs, develop agendas that encourage strategic questions and dialogue from your colleagues. CEOs, you can help by identifying real strategic questions facing the credit union. In partnership with the chair, highlight such questions by building an agenda item around them. While I do not suggest that credit union volunteers or executives lessen their focus on fiduciary oversight, I do suggest they can meet smarter and more effectively. Namely, that board meetings focused predominantly on information or data exchange are not enough. I urge them to remember that vision, strategy and effective governance are among the board’s central responsibilities. The structure and culture of board meetings can greatly assist—or impede—such vital responsibilities. Previous Next

< Back Assess for Success Michael Daigneault Jul 27, 2015 8 surefire times you need to evaluate your board’s performance In a recent study conducted by Quantum Governance , only 22 percent of credit unions rated themselves as “effective” or “very effective” at conducting a regular process of self-evaluation. Comparatively, 34 percent felt they were ineffective or even “very ineffective ” in doing so. With the long tenure of credit union board members and the continually evolving business climate that faces today’s credit union, remaining relevant, current and ahead of the curve is more important than ever. In fact, it is incumbent upon every credit union director to do so. A board assessment is a critical component in an ongoing process of board renewal, strengthening and improvement. Done well, it can provide an objective and comprehensive perspective that ultimately will help your board and senior management team focus your efforts, activities and precious resources. Together, you will identify your credit union’s strengths and challenges and, in doing so, find ways to move forward collectively to the betterment of your members. You can frame your issues in a new way, generating bright ideas and insights that will lead your credit union effectively into the future. Plus, you will build a baseline against which you can measure future progress. You should definitely consider a board evaluation in the near term if you: have a new credit union board chair or CEO want to elevate your credit union’s leadership or strategy to the “next level” have been experiencing very high or very low board member turnover need to address issues or concerns with your current governance structure, policies and/or practices are getting ready to launch a new strategic planning initiative (or revise your current strategic plan) are considering a merger or acquisition have experienced significant change, growth or “crisis” within your credit union or board have not undertaken an evaluation in the last three years Previous Next

BREAKING NEWS: Quantum Governance Joins Callahan & Associates to Advance Credit Union Governance. Press Release Governance Grow Your Vision Welcome visitors to your site with a short, engaging introduction. Double click to edit and add your own text. Start Now We've Launched New Services to Meet the Needs of Smaller Credit Unions. Press Release Our Vision is Exceptional Leadership for Mission-Driven Organizations. Learn More Credit Union News Nonprofit News

Policy Shop Quantum Governance maintains an extensive Resource Library of contemporary governance policies, job descriptions and committee charters ― and our library continues to grow each year. Today, there are more than 65 different policies and documents available to assist you in achieving the goals within your Governance Action Plan.

Strategic Planning Services Quantum Governance believes in a collaborative and iterative cyclical process between the CEO/Executive Management and the Board in developing a strategic plan for the fulfillment of your organization’s vision and mission. In addition to facilitating the strategic planning process, we can assist you in the following ways: Assessing and Reimagining the Planning Cycle Defining (or redefining) Your Vision, Mission & Values Identifying Strategic Goals & Objectives Contact us to learn more about how we can help you plan for the future of your organization. "An effective strategy drives your organization's mission by identifying what is possible, what is feasible and what is bold." Paul Dionne, Chief Strategy Officer

Paul Dionne Chief Strategy Officer & Lead Consultant Paul is a results-driven leader with a record of successfully promoting and nurturing innovation, growth and impact in a variety of contexts. With academic, global, and practical experience in governance, organizational transformation, and cultural anthropology, Paul brings a wealth of strategic thinking, research, facilitation and activation skills to his clients. Prior to joining Quantum, Paul served as Research Director at Filene Research Institute where he guided research design, execution, analysis, and the translation of findings into actionable insights. Paul helped conduct research, surface core findings and develop compelling content that supported organizational growth and transformation. Paul led the creation and delivery of research reports, keynote speeches, webinars, and closed-door engagements supporting credit union strategy; innovation; member experience; cultural alignment; operations; digital transformation; financial inclusion; and the future of financial services. Paul also served at Beloit College as their Associate Director of Student Success, Equity, and Inclusion. In this and other roles at Beloit College, he supported the development and implementation of institution-wide strategic initiatives, government and foundation relations, sponsored research, and equity & inclusion programs. Paul believes in giving back to his community and currently volunteers as Board Secretary for Rock Valley Credit Union . Paul received an M.B.A. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He pursued graduate studies in cultural anthropology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a research focus on international development, nonprofit governance, and agricultural cooperatives in Indonesia. He received his B.A. from Middlebury College. Originally from Canada, Paul now lives in Wisconsin and cooks poutine at home for his family. Back

< Back Into the COVID-19 Fire to Make Things Better for Members and Staff Caitlin Hatch Apr 3, 2020 A strong alignment of the CEO, senior leaders and the board enabled early, effective action. We were talking with one of our clients, F&A Federal Credit Union in Monterrey Park California, the other day and were struck by their early, decisive actions in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. (F&A was chartered in 1936 to provide financial services to employees of the Los Angeles County Forestry, Fire and Agricultural Departments.) We soon learned that the decisiveness in responsive to the coronavirus situation was the result of a combination of a well-thought out pandemic response plan and the courage to act when some might have argued that it was too early to do so. F&A FCU’s actions were made possible by a strong governance culture of trust between the credit union’s board and CEO Tim Green and his management team, all of which enabled Tim to make some tough, early calls. Tim told us that by late January he was concerned enough about the likelihood that the virus would impact the United States that he decided to implement the credit union’s pandemic response plan. As Melia Keller, VP/marketing notes, “Tim a visionary on this … the need to prepare for a quarantine. It was really hard to fathom. We ordered laptops and set them up to work remotely, came up with a communication plan, prepared for kids being at home, employees working remotely and identified people of a higher risk and started them working from home right away.” And, the board was supportive of it all. In February, F&A FCU developed and prepared call center scripts and emergency member communications, Melia told us, “We had a communication plan in place, with scripting for outbound messaging. It all emphasized caring for the member. That has really differentiated us. We approached everything from a perspective of compassion and humanity.” Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, the credit union focused on ways to make things better for its members and its employees. It developed programs to meet the members’ needs, including loan deferment through enhanced skip a pay, the waiving of loan late fees, and a short-term 0% APR loan of $5,000 for any member impacted by COVID-19—regardless of credit score and knowing some loans may not be repaid. Employees are empowered to help where they can, and for one desperate member, this meant F&A FCU even provided a couple of rolls of toilet paper at the drive-through window. For employees, Tim initiated a short-term 30% raise and offered 40 additional hours of paid time off to use as needed. For employees working in the branches (one is drive-through only, the other has limited teller hours), the credit union caters lunch, so they don’t have to go out. They even gave each staff member two rolls of that precious toilet paper from the credit union’s supplies! According to Tim, the goal was similar to the goal of its firefighter members: to make things better. “Everything was pre-planned, except the toilet paper and the decision on the 30% temporary pay adjustment,” he said. Tim felt confident that he could make that command decision and that the board would support it—and indeed it has. Tim noted to us that COVID-19 “has crystalized our values without us having to talk about it. We are the ones who are there for you.” It struck us that the F&A FCU leadership—board and staff – were running “into the fire” of the COVID-19 pandemic, ready and able to help its members, just as its own firefighter members are ready, willing and able those in need. The CU’s preparation, shared dedication to service and, perhaps most importantly, culture of trust (even though Tim is a relatively new CEO) have been invaluable for F&A FCU members. Caitlin Hatch previously served as a senior consultant with Quantum Governance and has worked with credit unions for the past eight years, focusing on governance and strategic planning. Prior to that, she served for 25 years as general counsel and corporate secretary for the largest anthracite coal company in the United States. Previous Next

< Back Millennials Are Many Things, Including Your Future Board Leaders Michael Daigneault and Gisele Manole Jun 26, 2018 Getting to know them can aid your recruiting. If you had a crystal ball that allowed you to peer into the future, my guess is that a number of you might use it to—among other things—help ensure your credit union’s success. Critical to any such success, however, is the answer to the question: Who sits on your Board? Perhaps one of the most alarming things we at Quantum Governance discovered in our research for The State of Credit Union Governance 2018 was that a full 46 percent of respondents describe their credit union’s effectiveness at finding, recruiting and nominating new board talent as only adequate or less than adequate. The ongoing challenge to attract the best talent to serve on your board is as old as it is evergreen. So, while a crystal ball may be helpful in identifying who holds the keys to your credit union’s future, it likely falls short of providing you with a practical means to actually recruit future board members into service—particularly the younger generations of potential board members. As anyone who has endeavored to recruit talent to their board can attest, you have to know a thing or two about who you’re looking for. So who are your credit union’s future board leaders and how might you connect with them? As the large Baby Boomer generation (1946-1964) retires from board service, Generation X (1965-1980) does not have the numbers to fill their seats. As such, the Millennial generation (1981-1996) will have to be invited to serve in leadership positions as soon as possible. Don’t underestimate them...many are ready to serve effectively right now! Millennials are, of course, a unique generation and it’s more important than ever to understand the types of things that set them apart from previous generations. They are most effectively recruited by...other millennials. You should use any millennial board, associate board, board committee and staff members you may already have to actively recruit effective new young leaders. You can also reach out to connected members of the credit union and to key players in business, government and nonprofit organizations in communities where your credit union operates. Even if you don’t know them yet, find a way to reach out, make new friends, and actively introduce your credit union to them. They are the most ethnically diverse generation in U.S. history. We often hear that boards are striving to look more like their membership. The millennial generation embodies the diversity needed to ensure that members are properly and culturally represented. They are early adopters and technologically savvier than previous generations. As your membership migrates online, so do many of your products and services. Engaging your members through contemporary, user-friendly, and secure mobile and digital interfaces will help grow your credit union and attract younger members. They are optimistic about the future and educated. Positivity fuels productivity. Millennials see possibilities and have an eye trained on the future—which is exactly where you need to set your sights in order to succeed in fulfilling your credit union’s vision and mission. Millennials are often keenly interested in professional development opportunities. You can suggest that board service is certainly a great one! They are interested in helping people and supporting causes. To date, many millennials have been relatively unattached to religion or organized politics (although that may be changing). This leaves a critical mass of them open to the social purpose and mission-centered credo of credit unions. Sure, focus on excellent products and services, but don’t underestimate the power of “cause” and the good work a credit union can do. Ultimately, inviting new ideas and fresh thinking to your board meetings will have consequences. Appreciate the renewed energy and passion it brings. Appreciate also millennials’ talents. Be patient as you work through the challenges and questions that will also arise. As you bring on new board members, it’s important to remember that a robust orientation to your credit union and board service is essential to a successful transition. We are confident you will find that millennials are a vital human and leadership “investment” for your credit union that will pay off extremely well now—and far into the future. Previous Next

< Back The Concept of ‘Constructive Partnership’ Caitlin Hatch and Michael Daigneault Dec 23, 2019 Collaboration, more than control, fuels today’s high-performing boards. The Quantum Governance team has had the opportunity to work with a great many credit unions throughout the U.S. and Canada—often with the core objective of improving the working relationship between the board and the CEO (including the members of the senior management team that report directly to the CEO). Frequently we are asked, “Is there an approach towards credit union governance we should adopt to best achieve this vital goal?” For most, we recommend adopting the framework of a “constructive partnership” between the board and the CEO/senior management team. One of our clients recently challenged us to define what we mean by a constructive partnership and put it in writing. This blog is the result of that thoughtful challenge. Origins of the Concept of ‘Constructive Partnership’ The concept of a constructive partnership was first developed by Richard Chait, Ph.D., a nonprofit governance expert at Harvard University. In his book Governance as Leadership , Chait suggests the best way to frame the relationship between a board and CEO is by focusing primarily on effective collaboration, rather than on effective control (as is the case with the Carver model of “policy governance”). The ways in which the board and management are effectively collaborating, fostering a leadership culture of trust, executing fiduciary oversight, crafting strategy together, offering mutual support and—yes—holding each other accountable to further the organization’s mission is what we (and Dr. Chait) mean by a constructive partnership. The Central Question The central question that the constructive partnership governance framework attempts to answer is this: “How can the board and the CEO (along with the senior management team) work together most effectively while still observing their respective areas of authority to achieve the credit union’s vision and mission?” The keys to success are in effective teamwork, genuine collaboration and mutual accountability, with both the board and CEO creating maximum value to move the strategic goals of the credit union forward. Within the constructive partnership between boards and management, boards retain the primary legal responsibility for governance—the proper exercise of ultimate authority—of their organization. Boards also exercise organizational oversight and ultimate policy setting. They properly delegate to the CEO and the senior management team the responsibility for managing operations, personnel and day-to-day organizational resources. As the BoardSource publication The Source: Twelve Principles of Governance That Power Exceptional Boards notes: While respecting this division of labor, exceptional Boards become allies with the CEO in pursuit of the mission. They understand that they and the chief executive bring essential, complementary ingredients to the governance partnership that, when combined, are greater than the sum of their parts. Exceptional boards recognize they cannot govern well without the CEO’s collaboration and that the CEO cannot lead the organization to its full potential without the board’s unflagging support. This central governance “partnership relationship” was further developed by the work of Ram Charan—co-author of Boards That Lead and probably the leading governance expert in the world today. Charan’s framework emerges from the central question: When is it appropriate for a board to “(1) take charge, (2) partner or (3) [delegate]”? Similar to Chait, the focus of Charan’s work is that the board and the CEO should work strategically and collaboratively as a team for the good of an organization and its mission. There are, according to Charan, appropriate situations where (1) it is the board that should take charge and lead, such as in the choice of the next CEO. There are also circumstances in which (2) the board and senior management should thoughtfully and consciously work to actively partner with each other, such as in the creation of an organization’s vision, mission and strategy. Lastly, there are significant areas in which (3) the board should delegate appropriate management authority to the CEO and his or her team, such as in nearly all tactical, personnel, operational and execution matters. One way to think about the strong partnership focus of this framework is to reflect upon how a doubles tennis team works together. Consider Venus and Serena Williams, each superb individual tennis players, but also exceptional as a doubles team. When they are playing together, each must work to perform individually, but also bring out the best in her partner, so that the team can overcome any and all challenges it faces. The benefits of a constructive partnership model emerge even more clearly when one considers the alternatives. What if the board alone took on the responsibility of determining the credit union’s strategy? Then the CEO/senior leadership team would not be able to contribute their expertise, and they would be significantly challenged to fully understand and effectively implement the board's identified strategic goals. On the other hand, if the CEO and the senior management team developed the strategic goals without the board’s input, they would subvert one of the central roles of a credit union board—being meaningfully involved in helping to set the direction of a credit union. They could also potentially take the credit union too far down a path not supported by the board, creating significant conflict at the leadership level. The constructive partnership model calls for the board to take a strong partnership role as a strategic thought leader and visionary, in true collaborative partnership with the CEO and his or her team. Together, they must work effectively to determine the best path forward for the credit union, its members and the communities where the credit union operates. As such, the two must work closely together to consistently foster the quality of the board’s composition, knowledge and discussions to ensure the entire leadership team can be effective partners to move the vision and mission of the credit union forward. Caitlin Hatch previously served as a senior consultant with Quantum Governance and has worked with credit unions for the past eight years, focusing on governance and strategic planning. Prior to that, she served for 25 years as general counsel and corporate secretary for the largest anthracite coal company in the United States. Previous Next

< Back Effective Communications in the Board Room Jennie Boden Feb 1, 2019 Key Findings for Communication A great number of the governance challenges that we come across in the work that our firm undertakes with credit unions can be boiled down to matters of communications. Are your board members crossing over into day-to-day operations? Well…have their roles and responsibilities been clearly defined, updated and effectively communicated to them? Are there two or three (or even just one) members of your Board who are coming to meetings ill-prepared each and every month? It’s probably time for your Board or Governance Committee Chair to have a heart-to-heart, one-on-one conversation that may be long over-due. Is the relationship between your Board and CEO riddled with micromanagement, executive sessions and a lack of trust? It’s possible that you stopped having authentic, open dialogue far too long ago. After years of surveying credit union Board members, supervisory committee members, CEOs and senior staff members, Quantum Governance, along with CUES, recently published T he State of Credit Union Governance 2018: Five Data-Driven Recommendations for Future Success (State of CU Governance). There were three key findings relative to the need for more open, trusting communications that both surprised and troubled us. We encourage you to take notice of them and discuss these key findings with your board. If your credit union is struggling with any of these issues, it might be time to polish your own communications skills – individually and as a group. Key Finding #1 : More than 1/3 of the respondents that we surveyed report that their board does only an adequate or less than adequate job of asking the hard questions that need to be asked . Key Finding #2 : Thirty-nine percent (39%) of respondents reported that their board is only adequate or less than adequate at holding each other accountable . Key Finding #3 : And only 25% of CEOs and 27% of senior staff reported that their boards are very effective at building a leadership culture of trust – compared to 53% of supervisory committee members and 44% of board members. So, what’s happening at all of these credit unions? We were recently working with a credit union that received what we would term “Below Average” scores on survey questions regarding “accountability” and “asking the hard questions.” ‘Where do we begin,’ they asked. Luckily for them, their score on the “Trust” question was particularly high — a good place from which to build. They were quick to say that they all got along and worked well together – maybe too well together, perhaps? How many of your board votes are unanimous? Are your Board members held accountable when it’s appropriate? And, how many hard questions are you asking in your board meetings? The mark of a good board is not unanimity or harmony 100 percent of the time. Your job as a board member is to ask good, hard questions. To trust but verify. In a respectful and professional manner. All toward the good of the credit union. Be authentic. Be direct. Be open. Keep your promises. Keeping promises builds trust, and you’ll need to rely on strong relationships of trust while you’re holding each other accountable in the boardroom. Speaking of accountability: hold each other accountable as board members. Ask the hard questions that need to be asked. It’s among your most fundamental roles as board members. Previous Next

< Back A Continuously Bigger and Better Box Jennie Boden and Dr. Alexander Stein of Dolus Advisors Feb 1, 2022 Like a nautilus, Hudson Valley Credit Union’s board evolves beautifully into its next stage of governance. The nautilus is a shelled sea creature known for renewing itself in a most beautiful fashion. It builds a new chamber inside the cover of its shell, moves out of the compartment in which it has been living, and seals off the old. As it progresses over time, the nautilus creates an amazing spiral shell with many sections. In an ideal world, credit union boards would renew themselves as the nautilus does—building on the old to create a new, more expansive governance space. But how many credit unions engage in conversations about building the next era of board governance? In the 2020 State of Credit Union Governance , we reported that almost 25% of all board members have held their positions for at least 20 years. That’s okay to some extent because historical continuity is good. Institutional knowledge and accrued wisdom are important to tackling today’s complexities. On the other hand, we’ve seen directors who perpetuated a negative culture for decades and boards where members were battling serious age-related health issues. We’ve also seen boards struggle under the weight of training too many newcomers, people with insufficient experience joining the boards of $2 billion credit unions, and recent additions who didn’t understand the difference between governing and managing. How do credit union boards transition to their next stage more like the nautilus—gracefully striking a balance between historical continuity and the next right steps for the board and the organization overall? When leaders at $6.5 billion Hudson Valley Credit Union , Poughkeepsie, New York, decided it was time to take a fresh, top-to-bottom look at the board’s nominations process, we were privileged to accompany them and provide our professional guidance along the way. We are grateful to them for letting us tell you their elegant and effective story of board renewal. “As our credit union continued to grow to over $6 billion, we knew we needed to transform our governance,” says Board Chair Nancy Kappler-Foster, a CUES member. “Through our work with Quantum Governance and Dolus Advisors on increasing the effectiveness of our policies and practices—and in particular the constructive partnership between the board and the CEO—we understood the next step was to focus on the ideal board and supervisory committee of the future and then build a state-of-the-art nominations process to achieve that.” Getting Started Led by Kappler-Foster, the board began by chartering a new governance and nominations committee, integrating the original nominations committee as a subcommittee within a broader governance committee charter; redefining the roles and responsibilities for board members; and reevaluating its board-level committee structure overall. Next, the board examined its entire nominations process from recruiting to onboarding. We facilitated workshops with the board, management and supervisory committee that enabled Hudson Valley CU’s volunteers and management team members to commit to a new process that: Developed an overall vision for the nominations process, attending to group dynamics, tone and culture, trust, psychological safety and, of course, good governance. Leveraged decision science, combining business tactics, technology and behavioral sciences through a collaborative approach to help leaders make optimal, data-driven decisions. Surveyed the decision landscape, identifying and evaluating the credit union’s needs and ultimate goals at the board and supervisory committee levels and forecasting the probable consequences of its decisions. Challenged everyone involved to overcome their biases and blind spots, subordinating their own personal interests to the credit union’s best interests. Valued character in the boardroom as highly as key performance indicators, identifying not only hard skills and expertise but also character traits and attributes to drive the identification and prioritization of candidates. Identifying Needed Skills and Attributes We helped Hudson Valley CU’s leaders clarify the skills and attributes they sought in new board and supervisory committee members. Like many CUs, Hudson Valley CU’s leaders hadn’t revisited their wish list in ages. (See Hudson Valley Credit Union's Call for Board Candidates Refresh for the CU’s “before” and “after” calls for candidates.) We looked to data to guide the way toward a new standard. The 2020 State of Credit Union Governance report found significant differences between what credit unions sought in their candidates and the skills and attributes they actually valued in the boardroom. And Hudson Valley CU was no different. When we surveyed the CU’s board, supervisory committee members and management, we found they had been prioritizing skills in financial literacy, professional services and operations. However, the perceived value of those skills in the boardroom was significantly lower than for human skills like being able to focus on the future, do critical thinking and be independent-minded. We recommended that the CU prioritize (in both its recruitment and nominations processes) what its leaders value most in the boardroom. In actuality, the shift was likely long overdue, as it is for most credit unions. Following an analysis of their survey data and focused work with both the volunteer and management leadership, Hudson Valley CU developed a new call for candidates that delineated specific skills, attributes and character traits that matched the credit union’s changing governance needs, culture and core values—in alignment with what board members actually value in the boardroom. (See sidebar, “Hudson Valley CU’s Call for Candidates Refresh.”) “I was so gratified to see the change in focus from fiduciary- to strategic-related skills for our new board members,” says President/CEO Mary Madden, CCE, a CUES member who has announced her retirement effective Jan. 2, 2023. “As we look to the future and the $10 billion threshold (by 2027), the management team will be looking to our board to ask the hard questions that need to be asked from a strategic point of view, while we’re overseeing the day-to-day operations. Certainly, board members need to continue to be responsive to their fiduciary duties, but strategically, there are a lot of critical, strategic decisions in front of us.” The Candidate Process Historically, Hudson Valley CU used traditional routes for board recruitment—issuing the call for candidates on its website and in member statements and posting it in its branches. The CU’s nominations subcommittee leveraged AVP/PR and Corporate Communications Lisa Morris to help get the word out in new ways. Morris placed ads on LinkedIn, sent word out to the area’s largest chambers of commerce, and conducted outreach through other specialty membership organizations and associations in the CU’s region. For the first time, board members took a more active role in recruiting. All told, Hudson Valley CU received 18 applications for three open seats for its board last year. In the end, new board members came from board and volunteer referrals and Morris’ outreach to the Professionals of Color Network Hudson Valley . Morris believes casting the net wide was a value-add. “Any additional outreach we do as a credit union—whether it’s marketing for a new product or issuing the call for candidates to and through a new association—means we’re reaching potential new members,” she says. A CEO once told Quantum Governance that his board was so concerned that he would “stack the deck” in his favor, he wasn’t even allowed to know how many applications his credit union received in response to the call for candidates. We took the opposite tack, recommending that Hudson Valley CU include Madden in the entire process. As a result, she participated as an ex-officio, non-voting member of the nominations subcommittee, lending her decades of expertise in interviewing, evaluating and vetting high-level professional candidates. “At first, we were all a bit skeptical about including Mary in the process,” said Julie Majak, the current chair of Hudson Valley CU’s nominations subcommittee. “But having her participate was an important, positive change. After we reminded ourselves that she had a voice—not a vote—we all quickly moved on to benefit greatly from our CEO’s expertise and insights. Her participation is now a given moving forward.” We also recommended the nominations subcommittee add a peer evaluation for any incumbent candidates, as well as psychometric testing in the form of the EverthingDISC Workplace Profile and expand interviews from 20 minutes to an hour. We also helped the committee develop strategic interview question sets to be used for all candidates to test the issues most important to the credit union. Importantly, the nominations subcommittee approached each interview with a new, elevated perspective of what was required and a clear understanding of what the board was looking for in new volunteers. We recommended Hudson Valley CU use a five-point scale for evaluating candidates based on the outcome of the assessment. Future board members should be: skilled enough to be board chair (even though it might never be right for them to be chair, see January '22 Good Governance article ); critical and strategic thinkers; independent-minded; consensus-builders; and of unimpeachable integrity. We also suggested the nominations subcommittee prioritize diverse candidates and individuals with previous board experience and expertise in the financial realm. The nominations subcommittee selected five of the 18 candidates to interview, ultimately nominating three candidates who were later elected to the board. The subcommittee also launched an associate board member program. (At cues.org/boardpolicies , see package 1). This enabled bringing in a strong fourth candidate as an associate director, creating the opportunity to increase the candidate’s general knowledge of CU governance over time, while benefitting immediately from the candidate’s attributes and expertise. The Onboarding Process Not content with improving only the nominations process, Hudson Valley CU’s leadership also focused on enhancing its onboarding program for new volunteers. A small task force comprising both board and staff was created and led by an expert in training from the CU’s HR department. The task force expanded the CU’s original, skeletal onboarding process into a robust program that includes a 15-plus hour, four-session orientation curriculum with homework assignments and between-session learning. The program also includes a variety of training modalities and sources, including online modules from CUES; in-person presentations from staff and board members; and written materials. Beyond the orientation curriculum, Hudson Valley CU has committed to at least a 12-month onboarding process that includes regular check-ins by the board chair, committee assignments and access to the CEO, and management representatives who can provide tools, answer questions and serve as subject matter experts to help new directors understand the nuances of the CU industry, the CU’s budget, executive compensation and the economy, plus learn how their strategic decisions apply to and impact operations and results. Hudson Valley CU eventually aims to have all its volunteers and supervisory committee members participate in the onboarding process. The Human Dimensions of the Process We would be remiss if we didn’t address the challenges that such a significant amount of change raised. Implementing this multi-phase process was a massive undertaking for Hudson Valley CU’s board, supervisory committee and nominations subcommittee, and it represented a gap-leaping progression in the leaders’ ability to meet members’ needs. (For more, read, “ Key Outcomes and Lessons Learned From a Board Renewal Effort ”.) Successful organizational change involves more than good processes and procedures. People are the pivotal element, and enabling them to integrate new ways of thinking about and doing things is often the most challenging task. The starting point for change is recognizing that it’s needed. Implicitly, there must have been reasons, acknowledged or not, why any action hadn’t come sooner. The reasons change is hard and the right ways to contend with oppositional forces are unique to each situation. Still, Hudson Valley CU’s journey was not uncommon. Its particulars aside, we hope—as does the CU’s leadership—their story will be helpful for others contemplating similar enhancements. Board composition did shift over time at Hudson Valley CU, so a stagnated boardroom cohort was not the main board renewal problem the credit union faced. Rather, the board had not empowered the previous nominations subcommittee to function as a strategically important committee—recruiting the best candidates, helping to refresh the strategic makeup of the board and revitalizing its vision. While today the nominations committee is viewed by the board as one of its most consequential committees, it had been for years reduced to a group of people who executed the simple task of managing the logistics of the nominations process, with little to no strategic input or impact to the overall makeup of the board. Another consequence of that legacy was a contingent that strongly believed that maintaining the status quo was in the CU’s best interest. In their view, the introduction of innovative tools and processes to enhance Hudson Valley CU’s culture and governance posed a threat to the long-held assumption that the nominations process needed to be completely independent from the board and even management. Although the board had signed off on the innovations, some members of the nominations subcommittee concluded that the changes would be detrimental. “Some members of the committee were uncomfortable with the amount of dramatic change the consultants were looking to implement so quickly,” says CUES member Misty Decker, chair of the governance and nominations committee. In such a situation, building trust and giving the naturally conservative individuals the courage to try are what’s needed more than anything else. The antidote to resistance and anxiety-driven risk aversion is assurance, not force. Our approach was to mobilize a small group of institutional leaders—the board chair, the CEO, and the governance and nominations committee chair—to join us in a conversation with the nominations subcommittee members. We acknowledged that the proposed systemic changes were indeed a substantial and understandably frightening departure from the past. We heard their concerns, validating rather than dismissing their impassioned drive to guard normed cultural traditions, and we invited them to question and reconsider the benefits to change. “We were ultimately successful,” Decker adds, “because we had established trust in Quantum Governance’s experience addressing board issues with other credit unions and in Dolus Advisors’ expertise in driving organizational culture change.” Of course, the realities of dealing with stakeholder pushback are rarely straightforward. Navigating opposition can get hot and messy. Agreeing to disagree, building or re-establishing trust, and defining workable pathways to compromise can be arduous. But there is no more important work. And this work is and has been a powerful reminder that high-performing boards are a combination of capabilities and practices coupled with human dynamics and culture. Each of these areas entails differently defined tools and solutions to enhance or repair as well as to strengthen and elevate. They also require a healthy dose of humility to accept—and even celebrate—that the changes we embrace are actually only a work in progress. Alexander Stein, Ph.D . , is founder of Dolus Advisors , a consultancy that helps leaders address psychologically complex organizational challenges. Previous Next

< Back Embracing our New (Virtual) Reality Caitlin Hatch May 22, 2020 The new virtual reality is changing the way we do business. I saw an interview recently in which author, American diplomat and former State Department official Richard Haas observed that the COVID-19 pandemic is not so much a turning point for our society, but an accelerant. His comments alluded to the idea that trends only just beginning to emerge before the pandemic, have been “fast-tracked” and their significance amplified as we unlock the ways and means of our new normal. Perhaps the best and most accessible example of this phenomenon is our new fluency in virtual or video conference meetings and even social gatherings. At Quantum, we’ve operated as a virtual organization from the beginning, conducting much of our work via telephone, video conference and the miracle of the Internet. However, an important and transformative element to our work often culminated in traveling to meet clients, sometimes one-on-one but frequently in groups of 20 or more. And the public speaking engagements at conferences to even larger groups…how does that work continue, or does it? As so many of you have, we decided to take a case-by-case approach postponing our in-person retreats and workshops at first but quickly pivoting to 100% virtual via Zoom, Meet, WebEx and the myriad of other apps that have become as familiar to us as centuries-old brands like Kleenex and Clorox. As it happens, we have been in the regular practice of video conferencing with an international nonprofit organization who asked us to conduct individual board orientations with their multi-national Board. We had previously aided them in updating their core governance structures and establishing a better understanding of their core identity and purpose —orientation of their newest directors was the next meaningful step forward. This afforded us a unique opportunity to put into practice a new way of conducting board orientation…100% virtually! In the recently published The State of Credit Union Governance 2020 Report we identified that “a significant number of board members believe their boards must improve their current onboarding process.” Less than half of the directors surveyed for the study felt that they were “using an effective process to orient new board members to the work and dynamics of the board,” with 30% categorizing it as “adequate”— hardly a ringing endorsement. Thus, we developed a virtual board orientation, a solution for boards who struggle with finding enough hours in the day, volunteers to manage the effort, or simply engaging ways to orient new board members effectively and meaningfully. So we “upped our game” so to speak. Doing more video conferencing in particular around board orientation, and we’re creating more recorded video segments and interviews. Check out our Facebook and LinkedIn for the latest and greatest! We upgraded our typical teleconference to a video conference where face-to-face from our own homes has increased the intimacy of our client relationships in a way that would make Getting Naked author Patrick Lencioni proud of both our clients and of us. Caitlin Hatch previously served as a senior consultant with Quantum Governance and has worked with credit unions for the past eight years, focusing on governance and strategic planning. Prior to that, she served for 25 years as general counsel and corporate secretary for the largest anthracite coal company in the United States. Previous Next