Search Results

< Back Supervisory Committees Function Well, But... Michael Daigneault Apr 29, 2015 Just like CUs and their boards, supervisory committees must change with the times. We survey a lot of credit union board members. And generally most will say they are pretty satisfied with the job their supervisory committee is doing. In fact, of the five areas on which we survey (vision, mission and strategy; board structure and composition; fiduciary oversight; governance and leadership; and supervisory committee), fiduciary oversight and supervisory committee usually are the two highest-scoring areas. But I’ve been troubled lately. Why? Because a good percentage of board members we interview admit that: (1) they don't really know what their supervisory committee does; (2) if they do know what their committee does, the practices of their supervisory committee do not appear to have changed much in the last decade; and (3) almost 45 percent of board members think their supervisory committee’s analysis of the top operational and strategic risks facing their credit union are less than effective. Notably, half of the board members at one CU client even described their supervisory committee’s oversight of the external auditor--traditionally one of the key functions of that committee--as either adequate or even ineffective. So, what’s going on? Today’s credit unions are not like the credit unions of yesterday. The CU world is increasingly multifaceted, with regulatory complexity, a growing number of mergers and acquisitions, disruptors from all sides, evolving board governance and leadership practices, exploding technology, and different types and degrees of risk. Just as your credit union evolved from its early days when the governing board served multiple roles and the supervisory committee’s charter was likely focused only on the external audit, so, too is it time for that committee’s purpose to evolve with the changing landscape. Many supervisory committees today are being stretched beyond their traditional focus of helping to oversee the internal and external audit functions of a credit union. They also are being asked to carry out verification of accounts, receiving member complaints, ensuring regulatory compliance, and other critical oversight processes, including – for some credit unions – the possible suspension of credit union board members. The most progressive credit unions are going even further--asking supervisory (and audit) committees to expand the scope of their efforts to include the idea of risk beyond just financial risks. As such, some supervisory committees are taking a more active role in helping to encourage the credit union’s enterprise risk management efforts--working in cooperative partnership with management, including the CEO and CFO--to identify and mitigate key risks facing the credit union. How far does your supervisory committee go? And how would you and your colleagues on the board answer the question, How effective is your supervisory committee’s analysis of the top operational and strategic risks facing your credit union? Previous Next

Governance Services We offer a variety of ways to assess your governance employing a combination of the following methodologies: proprietary online survey, document review, interviews with members of your board, supervisory/audit committee, and executive leadership. Additionally, focus groups, meeting observations, member surveys and environmental scans may be added. Governance assessments are scaled to meet your organization’s needs. We can deliver the results of your assessment via an expertly facilitated retreat or a series of in-person or virtual workshops. Deliverables may include a report, best practices tailored to your organization, and a governance action plan. Additional governance services include: credit union industry benchmarking, year-to-year analysis for returning clients, developing a roadmap for growth and pre-merger assessment. Additional Governance Assessment Tools Leadership Culture Assessment & Policy Development CEO Evaluation Peer-to-Peer Evaluations Director Skills Inventory & Director Development Planning CEO Succession Plan Assessment & Development Supervisory/Audit Committee & Other Committee Assessments Board Succession: Assessment, Board Member of the Future Profile Development, Recruitment, Nominations & Succession Plan Development Communications & Information Architecture Study: Reimagining Your Board Packs & Meeting Agendas Contact us to learn more about how we can strengthen the leadership and governance of your organization. Jennie Boden, CEO "One of the most vital governance issues that organizations are faced with today is the evolution of their governance policies, practices and systems as they grow. We've found that -- as one CEO put it -- many have been 'working with their Boards, but not on their Boards.' While the organizations (including the Management) are growing and evolving, so, too, must an organization's governance."

Allen DeLeon Founding Partner, DeLeon & Stang, CPAs and Advisors Allen DeLeon was a Founding Partner of DeLeon & Stang, CPAs and Advisors and has served as an Adjunct Consultant on credit union audits, fraud and risk assessments and compliance engagements. Al has over 35 years of experience including audit, tax, business, and financial services advisory to credit unions, nonprofit organizations and business organizations. The firm, DeLeon & Stang, has developed a particular expertise in the area of credit union auditing, financial services and in working with credit union Supervisory/Audit Committees. Al is also a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Maryland Association of CPAs, the American Society of Association Executives, the Maryland & DC Association of Credit Unions, the Metropolitan Area Credit Union Association and the Association of Credit Union Internal Auditors. Al is an experienced Board member, having served on the Holy Cross Health Foundation as Vice Chair and as Chair of both its Governance and Finance Committees. He has also served as a Board member and Treasurer of the PIC MC Foundation of Montgomery College, Treasurer of the Mid-Atlantic Federal Credit Union and Board Chair of the Maryland Association of CPAs. Learn More Back

How Can We Help You? General Inquiries A member of our team will reach out within 48 hours. Name Email Phone Message We'll respond to your inquiry within 48 hours. Submit Mailing Address P.O. Box 204 Henniker, NH 03242 Operating Hours Monday-Friday 9:00 am - 5:00 pm ET For Media & Partnership Inquiries Gisele Manole, Chief Marketing Officer gisele@quantumgovernance.net Call Us 603 .513.2852

< Back Hope for Gen Z Comes in the Shape of Credit Unions Lauren Paradise May 6, 2024 Generation Z has the potential to be the greatest credit union generation, so why are so many credit unions struggling to get their attention? Generation Z has the potential to be the greatest credit union generation, but we are struggling financially and we need credit unions to step up to help. After I signed the lease for my first apartment last year, instead of the excitement you might expect I would feel, all I felt was hopelessness. I kept hearing the words of the leasing agent in my mind: “Rent is going to be X but that doesn’t include the security deposit or electric/gas utilities or pet fee or parking or Wi-Fi or furniture or laundry. Oh and it will go up next year.” All I could hear was fee after fee after fee, topped off with the guarantee of rising rent. It felt like there was going to be an extra fee just to breathe. This is the harsh reality for Gen Z after college. We feel like we are financially falling behind even before our journey begins. A few months ago, I attended a webinar that was supposed to be a facilitated discussion on what my generation (Gen Z) wants from their financial institutions, and how credit unions can connect with them. I had anticipated that someone of my generation would be speaking. How else would you be able to accurately represent the Gen Z perspective? To my disappointment, it was given by two people well beyond Gen Z, and while some of their statements were true, others were entirely inaccurate. Not including a Gen Z person in the conversation was a total miss. It’s a theme I have noticed in webinars and articles about Gen Z: they are all from the outsider’s perspective, observing us from a distance and not accurately reflecting our voice. After attending that webinar I asked myself, “As a member of Gen Z, what DO we really want from our financial institutions?” Of course, we want the obvious elements like a strong mobile app and financial education, but the first thing that came to my mind was HOPE . More than anything, my generation needs hope for their financial future. With the cost of living through the roof (for example, the cost of groceries is up 25% since 2020 ), many young people right now are asking themselves, “What is the point?” We feel a sense of futility in making smart financial choices like where to bank or apply for a loan, wondering if our choices will amount to anything in the face of the rising cost of everything. Despite that—and perhaps because my dad works for a credit union and I now work for a firm that works intimately with credit unions—the conclusion I have drawn is that credit unions are the ideal financial institutions for Gen Z. Yet only 4% of Gen Z are currently members of a credit union . Why is that? Perhaps the answer lies in that many members of Gen Z don’t even know what a credit union is, or if they do, they have misconceptions that deter them from being members. For example, the fact that credit unions are nonprofits in our communities should be a huge advantage in capturing younger members, as many of us loathe big corporations and find value in supporting local businesses . But Gen Z is almost assuredly not aware of things like shared branching and therefore sees the localized aspect of a credit union to be a weakness rather than a strength. Credit unions need to bridge this information and awareness gap, better leveraging social media to communicate frequently and hiring younger employees and ambassadors who can advocate from the inside, among many other strategies. Gen Z Is Aligned With Credit Union Philosophy There is a lot of alignment between the vision, mission and values of credit unions and what Gen Z is looking for—the messaging just needs to click. Ultimately, we want to feel like we are investing in something that will make a difference in our lives and in the lives of others. Credit unions are the prime foil to corporate banking greed. When I hear credit union board members share, “We need to keep members front and center in our minds at all times when making decisions for the credit union” or “We strive to have the lowest interest rates of any credit union in our area,” this is a refreshing change from the money-driven messaging of most corporations who seek to push the limits of what they can charge without losing customers, instituting absurd money grabs like surge pricing. Recently, I spoke with a credit union that is offering a mortgage loan with a down payment as low as 3%. This lower rate was established in direct response to their younger members being unable to buy a home in the current housing market. This type of offering can make a tangible difference in young people’s lives and is one example of how credit unions help us achieve our financial goals, hit life milestones, and offer up hope. Credit unions can’t solve all of our problems, and they can’t control the external political and economic factors that contribute to the financial angst of Gen Z, but they have a unique opportunity to ease the emotional burden and equip Gen Z with the tools, products and support that we need to better position ourselves to reach our financial goals. Most importantly, credit unions can offer their young members HOPE for their financial future. Previous Next

< Back Creating a 'Wow' Credit Union Board Meeting Michael Daigneault Aug 24, 2014 How to Take Your Meetings to the Next Level Consider a typical board meeting. There is a call to order, some chairman and CEO remarks, committee reports, a call for old and new business, then adjournment. Did you ever realize a vast majority of what is said aloud in the meeting is exactly the same information provided in written form, begging the question: Was that a "board" meeting or a "bored" meeting? As financial services have evolved from a staid, conservative industry to a highly competitive sales and service focused marketplace, the conversations happening in the boardroom have not experienced a parallel transformation. As I work with credit unions, I challenge them to ask themselves: Are we addressing the right questions in the board room? If you answered no, the board might be stuck at the dysfunctional or functional level of governance. How should we think or act differently? A new approach can help the board evolve to the responsible or exceptional level of governance. Here is my vision for leaving routinized (unconscious) meetings behind and evolving to "wow" (enlightened) meetings: Old New Top-down information exchange Dialogue and interaction Focus on data and past results Focus on thinking and future initiatives Approval of numerous administrative items Consolidated consent agenda Oversight and review Imagining and innovating One key component is the consent agenda. Instead of listening to a series of operational and financial reports, board members are expected to read a packet of information prior to the meeting and come prepared to approve numerous items with one concise motion. This frees up the agenda to focus on planning and strategy discussions. Safety and soundness will always be a priority, but while the fiduciary role of the board is still necessary , it is no longer sufficient to lead a credit union. As with most changes, the trick is in the transition from old to new. As you move toward this new model, some people will adapt quickly while others may find it difficult to leave their comfort zones. One excellent resource I’ve found helpful over the years is a book by William Bridges called “Transitions: Making Sense of Life’s Changes” and its companion “Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change.” Credit union leaders that have the courage to forge ahead will benefit by having a productive, engaged and focused board, creating boundless opportunities for the future. Previous Next

< Back Start Onboarding Pre-Election Michael Daigneault Nov 24, 2015 Eight steps supporting new board members' success Many credit union boards think the new director onboarding process starts when new board members have been elected to serve. But really, the key to building an effective onboarding program is not to wait for the election to take place. Just like board meetings run best when advance work is done to set them up for success, onboarding of new directors is greatly facilitated by steps boards can take before your members elect new directors. Consider taking the following key steps before the board election: Develop a matrix of your “ideal board” for achieving strategic goals. Create a skills matrix outlining the attributes and skills your board members currently have. Then, create a separate matrix showing those skills directors will need to carry your credit union successfully into the future. Be sure to do this with your strategic plan in mind. Identify board composition gaps. Compare your board’s current skills matrix with the skills matrix of your future, ideal board. What weaknesses do you see in your current board? Conduct a gap analysis. What attributes or skills are limited – or missing? Identify potential board candidates. Given the gaps you identify in step 2, what types of directors should you actively seek? You can even consider looking beyond existing credit union members and recruit board members from the community. Remember, they can always join the credit union, and they might add real value to your efforts. Involve, engage and educate potential directors. Show them the love! Ways to bring potential directors into the fold might include having them be a part of an associate board member program, or inviting them to a local community event. At the very least, you will want to be sure they visit a local branch and meet with the CEO and some of your credit union’s best and brightest staff. Do a background check and talk to references for potential board members. Remember, your potential, new volunteer will be responsible – legally and financially – for the credit union. Do your due diligence. Gauge the prospective director’s level of Interest. Here’s where you can begin to introduce your potential candidate to your other directors. Begin to take his or her pulse more formally to gauge his or her interest in candidacy. Confirm the potential director’s interest in and willingness to serve. Have a candid conversation about what time and knowledge is involved. Talk about the risks, too. Formally invite the potential director to stand for election. Here’s where your hard work pays off. Make the ask. If your candidate agrees to run—and is ultimately elected—you’ll need a process in place for orienting him or her to the work of your board. Previous Next

< Back Board Size Michael Daigneault Jul 28, 2015 There's no one-size-fits-all answer to how many directors you need. One of the questions I’m asked most often by credit union directors and CEOs is this: “What’s the best size for our credit union board?” There’s no fast and easy answer but, essentially, you want your board to be large enough so you can appropriately govern and help lead the credit union, and yet small enough so you function effectively as a cohesive leadership team. For your credit union, what size might that be? Our experience is that credit union boards of seven, nine or 11 appear to be most effective. Here is the essence of our reasoning: Boards of five or fewer are efficient but committee work, diversity and inclusiveness may suffer. With five or fewer members, the work of the board tends to be accomplished as a “committee of the whole.” This framework may be sufficient for certain small or relatively uncomplicated credit unions, but it quickly becomes a very real and limiting factor when considering how much work a small board can realistically accomplish. While we do not believe credit union boards should have an excessive number of committees, it does increase the board’s capacity to accomplish vital work when directors can divide themselves into a few committees and task forces. Having committees and task forces also helps develop a somewhat larger group of volunteers who can be potentially called upon to become board members in the future. Additionally, credit unions are cooperatives of many different types of people. What very small boards of five or less offer in terms of ease and efficiency, they typically lose in terms of diversity and inclusiveness. This lack of diversity is evident not only in terms of gender, nationality and race, but also will likely result in a lack of individuals who are of a different age or who can bring additional, valuable skills, perspectives, experiences, and the like to the board’s efforts. Boards of 12 or more can be complicated to manage, can pose challenge to trust-building, can be more expensive to run, and can make it harder to gain true consensus. Boards of this size do exist in the credit union community, but they are rare. They often arise for such reasons as : (1) mergers and acquisitions that combine two boards; (2) a desire to offer more members the opportunity to serve; (3) a lack of will or desire to “kick” long-term colleagues off the board as new members are added; and (4) a “representative mindset” that supports having a board with folks from a variety of stakeholder groups or geographic areas. If your board is on the larger size, do not let the executive committee become a “board within the board.” It will upset the balance of power, and often results in an “insider” vs. an “outsider” dynamic that can cause some directors to be too passive or disengage altogether. In all, size is a nuanced question, with a nuanced answer. The exact size that’s best can shift from credit union to credit union depending on many factors, such as the role the board is playing, the number of board committees, the complexity of the credit union, the history of the credit union, and the quality of its leadership. In the end, keep in mind that the role of your credit union’s board is to govern in constructive partnership with your CEO. In most circumstances (as long as you remain in the sweet spot of between seven and 11 members), the exact number of board members ends up being less important than your directors’ collective ability to work effectively, add real value and help move the mission of your credit union forward. Previous Next

< Back The Benefits of Board Committees Michael Daigneault Nov 1, 2016 Get the most out of them by applying these bright ideas. If there’s one thing that board members and management often share, it is a disturbing sense of uncertainty as to the real benefits of board committees. From a board member’s point of view, committee meetings can sometimes be seen as another meeting to travel to, one more report to read, or—worse yet—an additional PowerPoint presentation to sit through. To top it off, it can frequently appear to volunteer leaders that “all their hard work” on a committee is—at times—somewhat less than appreciated by both their fellow board members and management alike. Of course, the challenge of committee work is not exclusive to board members or other volunteer leaders. Management has the responsibility of assigning staff (who already have full-time jobs) to assist the work of the committees, helping to gather information, coordinating schedules, writing reports, preparing presentations as well as developing motions and updating or crafting new policies for the committee’s (and board’s) final consideration. Staff is regularly “rewarded” for their efforts by then being asked to assist in implementing the to-do list of items that emerge from an affirmative vote at the board level. You may ask, “Does this mean that board committees should be abolished?” “No,” we would respond. “But,” you might think, “to overcome the types of burdens described above, committees better have some real benefits!” Fortunately, if done well—they do provide some very real benefits. If not done well, however, they are not the “value-add” they are intended to be. Do you know whether your committees are truly effective? When is the last time you evaluated your board committees (as well as the overall committee structure) to ensure that they are providing genuine value to your credit union? When established, charged and composed effectively, board committees can be a valuable asset to both your board and your management team by helping to: identify and examine key issues, concerns and questions ahead of board meetings. give laser focus to a project delegated by the board and/or helping to get things done more quickly and efficiently than would be possible for the full board. more equitably distribute the board’s work, since committee assignments can be dispersed among board members. facilitate trust-building between board members and management through their combined efforts. (It’s always a good idea to include relevant members of your management team on your board committees, too!) increase engagement among individual board members and help them make a more meaningful contribution to the board and to the credit union. But, what does it take to establish, charge, and compose your board’s committees effectively? The State of Your Committees There’s no right or wrong number or kind of committees for each CU board. In fact, we would argue that beyond supervisory committees for federal credit unions and some state-chartered CUs and audit committees for other state-chartered credit unions, there really isn’t a must-have list of committees for credit unions. In establishing or reviewing your board committee structure, the two rules of thumb that we would have you follow are these: Board committees should be established to do the work of the board, not the work of the staff; and Establish standing, board committees only when there is sustained, permanent, ongoing work for the committee members to undertake. Otherwise, we encourage you to use ad-hoc committees and task forces to accomplish your work early and often. Ad-hoc committees are likely to exist for more than a year, but not intended to be permanent. For example, a CU board may create a “new headquarters committee” that would exist for several years. Its purpose would be to help the board understand and oversee the important process of: 1) identifying the need for a new headquarters; 2) outlining the central benefits and challenges of doing so; 3) identifying or constructing the new building; 4) managing the financial implications of the new headquarters; and 5) overseeing the transition plan to move to the new building. At the end of its work, once the credit union has successfully moved into the new building, the committee would be dissolved. Task forces are even more temporary. They almost always exist for less than a year, and they are generally subgroups made up of both board and staff, but they may also include other volunteers or even outside experts or consultants. Task forces are charged with focusing on (and learning more about) a particular issue, question, opportunity or challenge and then reporting back to the board their thoughts and findings within a defined period of time. Sometimes task forces may simply report back the information they have gathered. In other cases, they are also asked to provide one or more recommendations for the board’s consideration. Once they have provided their recommendations, unless the board asks for further work from the task force, they are dissolved. What’s a Committee to Do? Charging your committees—that is setting their course of action—is an important board responsibility. Did you notice that we said board responsibility and not management responsibility? This is key. Board members need to determine what you want your committees to accomplish. In the spirit of constructive partnership, we encourage you to ask your CEO and management team for their input. Once you know what you want your committees to accomplish, we suggest you set it down in a committee charter. Include these key sections in the charter document: Prologue: A brief overview of the committee’s key function. Meetings: A statement on how frequently the committee must meet. Members: The required number and qualifications of committee members. This may include restrictions on committee membership. For example, if you opt for an executive compensation committee, you would likely not want a member of the management team to serve on this committee. Committee leadership: Outline any position requirements and responsibilities for the committee chair and/or secretary Role of the CEO: Outline the roles and responsibilities of the CEO vis-à-vis this particular committee. Charge: Detail the roles and responsibilities of the committee, including reporting requirements to the board. The most important thing to know about all of your board committees is this: Unless it’s explicitly stated, your board’s committees do not have decision-making authority; they can only provide recommendations to the full board for their action. Let us repeat that: Unless it’s explicitly stated, your board’s committees do not have decision-making authority; they can only provide recommendations to the board for their action. Finding the Right People to Serve Unless governmentally regulated (such as for supervisory or audit committees), there is no hard-and-fast rule about the number of members a committee should have. Three to five members is often optimal. Committees generally have more credibility if there is some diversity of opinions and experiences. Too many opinions and duplicative effort can result when a committee grows too large. This is particularly the case with credit unions that have fairly small boards. If the committee grows too large, efficiency may be lost. The ideal composition of a committee depends on a variety of factors, such as the committee’s purpose, charter, size, chair and even the experience of its members. It’s best to have at least one board member on a committee. But including non-board members or community members on board committees can be an effective way of reaching out and potentially beginning to build your bench for future board members. Each committee should also have an official non-voting staff liaison appointed to help carry out its efforts. Your board chair and the CEO should also be treated as ex-officio, non-voting members of all board committees unless the substance of the committee’s deliberations would be in conflict with their attendance. (Consider our previous example where a CEO would not attend a meeting of a committee doing an analysis of his or her performance and compensation package.) Other than these basic parameters, be bold. Cast your net widely, and don’t assume that your strategic planning task force should be filled with only strategic thinkers. Remember, there are other aspects to strategic planning that are important, such as developing a realistic budget for those strategic goals. Thus, a financial mind would be a good addition to your strategic task force, too. Our guess is that if you are like most credit union boards, you are probably secretly worrying about your board committees. Shed some needed light on them. Don’t just carry on with the same committee structure that you’ve always had, just because you’ve always had it. Board committees are a significant component of your credit union’s governance structure. And they draw a significant number of staff resources. Be sure that you are using them wisely. Do you have the right committees? Tasked with the right responsibilities? Composed with the right folks and aided by the right staff? Be brave. Ask yourselves these questions—and more questions like them. You’ll be very glad you did. Previous Next

< Back ERM Is Everyone's Responsibility Michael Daigneault May 23, 2017 10 steps to take to ensure your leadership is doing all it can to identify and manage risk A study released last year— Risk Management for Nonprofits —raised quite a storm in some circles. While the particular risks faced by the charitable sector are often different than those in the credit union community, the study has, nonetheless, been an effective catalyst for raising awareness about the need to have a board-level conversation about risk and risk management. I’ve mentioned before that we have the good fortune of conducting governance assessments for credit unions throughout the United States. Only about a third of the CU boards we’ve assessed describe their ability to identify risk as “very effective,” and an even smaller group of them say they’re “very effective” at mitigating those risks once they’re identified. From a governance point of view, this is a pretty significant finding. And one that demands attention. For many CUs, discussions of risk begin and end with financial matters—interest rate risk, loan loss risk, fraud risk, etc. But is that enough? Aren’t there other risks that organizations face? And, what is risk, anyway? The authors of the Wyman/SeaChange study define risk as “unexpected events and factors that can have a material impact on an organization’s finances, operations, reputation, viability and ability to pursue its mission.” While the definition comes from a study on the charitable nonprofit sector, we think it’s a pretty good place to start in terms of framing the concept of risk for credit union board and committee members. But, let’s look a bit deeper, as some credit unions have begun to do. We are thinking about enterprise risk management, which is not just the responsibility of your board, management, board committees, a risk specialist, your external auditor or even an internal auditor. Yes, each has a role in understanding and managing risk. We’d also suggest that your supervisory or audit committee should play even greater role than typically given them. (Read more about the expanded role of the supervisory committee in “ Supervisory Committees Function Well ’ and “ Internal Watchdog, Plus … ” The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission is a voluntary, private-sector organization dedicated to guiding executive management and governance participants towards more effective, efficient and ethical business operations. It defines ERM as “a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, applied in strategy setting and across the enterprise, designed to identify potential events that may affect the entity, and manage risk to be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of entity objectives." Are you doing all that you can, as credit union leaders, “to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of entity objectives?” To get you started, consider these 10 steps: Ensure that your board assumes its full governance role, including not only its legal duties, but formal and informal governance responsibilities. With the rapid pace of change and the many threats facing CUs today, it’s imperative that your board understands that it must play a vital role. Formally task your supervisory or audit committee with ERM. Ensure that your committee is on the leading edge of today’s best practice of going beyond simply conducting an audit. Consistent with board policies, management will still conduct the operational work. It's the committee’s role to ensure it is being done regularly and effectively. Be sure you have the right people, in the right seats, to support effective ERM. Identify the best people from among your volunteers and staff. Develop an explicit risk tolerance statement that indicates the level of risk your credit union is willing to take. Once your board has assumed its duties in this area, this should be one of its first tasks. Be sure to constructively partner with your CEO and his or her management team, as well as members of your supervisory or audit committee. Develop a list of key risks and include brief scenario planning to address them. We had one credit union client that was housed in the World Trade Center on Sept. 11. It lost nearly everyone and everything on that day, but within a day, it was up and operating at a remote location in New Jersey. Scan your credit union’s internal and external risks in your annual strategic planning. Make sure key risks are identified and considered. Include financial benchmarking in your annual scan. Review your financial reports and projections and compare your position to similarly-situated organizations. Set appropriate financial targets to support your risk tolerance statements, as well as your scenario planning. Once you have reviewed your financial benchmarking data, develop a plan to address any risks therein. Put your plan and reports in writing. Be sure that your perceived risks, opportunities and scenario planning is shared broadly with the board, supervisory or audit committee, and appropriate members of the management team. Update your plan on a regular basis. Be sure to revisit your risk tolerance statement, financial benchmarking, scenario planning and your ERM plan annually. We don’t need to tell you that the environment is changing rapidly, and that means your risks are likely evolving, too. Be sure that you’re on top of them and ready to pivot. It’s fundamental to your responsibilities as leaders of your credit union. Your members are counting on you. Previous Next

< Back Know When It’s Time To Go Jennie Boden Feb 28, 2023 Holding onto your board position may be best for you, but what’s best for your credit union? In September 2021, I wrote an article entitled “Are Women Better Leaders?” Then, I referenced several studies and articles from sources including the Pew Research Center, Forbes and The Washington Post that seemed to suggest that maybe, just maybe, women might have an edge over their male counterparts when it comes to leadership. The Pew study found “few differences between women and men in terms of leadership, [but noted that] women are perceived as more compassionate, empathetic leaders.” The Forbes article cited “studies … [that state] ‘women tend to outperform men.’” And The Washington Post article reported that countries led by women “suffered far lower death rates” than those led by men during the first wave of COVID-19. That very article cited the leadership of New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern during the pandemic. A study conducted by Alex Beatie at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, found that Ardern’s leadership during the pandemic “is considered … [among] the best in the world.” Beatie noted three key themes of Ardern’s daily press briefings and the government’s communications: “1) open, honest and straightforward communications; 2) distinctive and motivational language; and 3) expressions of care.” And Prime Minister Ardern has done it again. She is leading in an open, honest and straightforward way—this time with an expression of care for both her country and her responsibilities to and for it and for herself. On Jan. 19, 2023, I joined most of the world in surprise when Ardern announced that she would resign as her country’s prime minister just a month later. During her announcement, she said, “I’m leaving because with such a privileged role comes responsibility.” She continued, stating, “The responsibility to know when you are the right person to lead and also when you are not. I know what this job takes. And I know that I no longer have enough in the tank to do it justice. It’s that simple.” Her words struck me. How many times have I heard credit union board members say, “They’ll drag me off this board feet first, if I have anything to do with it?” Or even been given a heads-up by a CEO that a couple of their board’s directors could have the beginning stages of dementia? We’ve even had clients who have experienced the wholesale turnover of their board and their CEO within two short years. Tell me, how is that considered responsible leadership? A Characteristic of Responsible Leadership With 83% of credit union board and supervisory/audit committee members, CEOs and other C-suite staff reporting in the 2023 edition of The State of Credit Union Governance that their credit unions do not have term limits, it’s no wonder that the average age of board members today is 76.3 years, and they have been serving on their boards for an average of 19 years. Holding on to your board position may be what’s best for you, but is it in your credit union’s best interest? What if more of our credit union directors took Prime Minister Ardern’s tack and asked themselves this important question: Are you still the right person to lead your credit union into the future? And if you’re not, consider the three themes identified above: 1) Be open, honest and straightforward; 2) use distinctive language to motivate your colleagues for the future; and 3) above all, consider every action that you take as a director an expression of care and concern for the credit union and your members. Previous Next

< Back The Sophisticated Art of Ensuring Your Board Grows Alongside Your Credit Union Gisele Manole Dec 27, 2022 Four areas to focus on. Whenever we interview credit union directors or senior leadership and ask about strategic priorities, we hear them talk about some version of growth—asset growth, membership growth, loan growth, SEG expansion, and the list goes on. We rarely hear about growth as it relates to the board. As credit unions continue to grow operationally, boards just seem to be along for the ride. Some are keeping up, but many are not. Would you hire the same CFO or director of finance for a $5 billion credit union as you would for one with $5 million in assets? Of course not. You know that as your credit union grows operationally, your staff must have the experience and expertise to do their part with excellence. So too, must your board. One of the situations that should prompt an assessment of your credit union’s governance is growth itself. As your credit union’s assets crest $1 billion, $5 billion and especially $10 billion , regulatory requirements change, the complexities of your institution’s financial structures will increase, and your board will be challenged to govern quite differently than it once did when your institution was smaller. CUES member Chris Parker, president/CEO of $1.5 billion Northeast Credit Union commented recently that “for so long we have all focused on working with our boards. We need to shift our foci now to working on our boards—bringing our boards along as our credit unions grow operationally.” This struck a chord with us. Yes! How are you growing as a board to complement the sophistication and expertise of your credit union’s executive team? Beyond the continuing education that so many dedicated board members diligently pursue, what are some of the things you should consider and important questions you and your board need to ask to ensure that your board is growing and keeping pace with your credit union? Four Areas for Board Governance Growth Committees. Has your committee structure evolved to inform the strategic work of the board? Ten years ago, governance committees were a rarity. We are happy to report that whenever we ask a room full of credit union directors how many of them have a governance committee, at least half if not a third of their hands go up. A formal governance committee provides boards with a specialized forum in which to oversee critical issues, including nominations and renewal, monitoring board performance, and ensuring that board policies and procedures are relevant and contemporary. These are all deeply important to ensure the continued achievement of your credit union’s vision and mission. Developing an active and forward-thinking governance and nominations committee is one of the most strategic and forward-thinking moves a credit union can make. Policies. If you are regularly hosting hybrid or even fully virtual meetings, do you have a policy on virtual board meetings? As countless boards talk about the importance of diversifying their boards, how many of them have a formal DEI policy? Governance policy manuals are not evergreen. Look beyond updating what you already have and ensure that your board-level or governance policies support your strategic growth and direction. Board Meeting Agendas. In The State of Credit Union Governance, 2020 , published by CUES and Quantum Governance, directors revealed that they spend only 26% of their time in board meetings on strategic matters. Further, our review of credit union board meeting agendas and minutes suggests that 26% might be an overestimate. Boards must become deliberate in allocating time to strategy regularly, and board chairs and the CEO must collaboratively master the fine art of developing agendas to prompt strategic and even generative discussions. Consider the use of digital technologies, for example, to approve budgets or conduct trainings. Meeting tools such as consent agendas and dashboards can speed the transfer of data and reports. Then, with the time you have left, ask yourself, are our board meeting agendas routinely focused on strategic matters? If not, how do we modernize and change them to keep up with our evolving governing role? Board Composition. Just as a $5 billion credit union wouldn’t hire a CFO that didn’t have an appropriate level of expertise or experience, your credit union board needs directors that have the mix of skills and experience needed to effectively advise your CEO and executive leadership. You can’t know if you have the director talent and expertise your credit union needs unless you develop matrices that illustrate where your directors currently have strong skills as well as areas of needed development. Does your credit union have a plan for retiring directors who are unable or unwilling to contemporize their skills and practices to keep up with the growing needs of your credit union? Don’t suffer gaps on the board because you are urgently filling a board seat, either. Plan carefully and properly for director departures. Thoughtfully onboard new directors with knowledge of what they as unique individuals bring to the table and how their talents and expertise may translate to your credit union’s vision and mission. Previous Next