Search Results

< Back Key Outcomes And Lessons Learned From A Board Renewal Effort Jennie Boden and Dr. Alexander Stein of Dolus Advisors Jan 31, 2022 An analysis of Hudson Valley CU’s work to revise key governance processes. Quantum Governance and Dolus Advsiors are pleased to offer the following key outcomes and lessons learned from our work with $6.1 billion Hudson Valley Credit Union in revisioning and revising their nominations process. (For more background, read the feature story detailing the work we did with Hudson Valley CU.) Key Outcomes The nominations sub-committee learned it could be nimble, coalesce around change and have a significantly increased impact on the future of the Hudson Valley CU board and supervisory committee. In the end, the members were proud of the changes they implemented and the outcome of their work. And, importantly, they served as a model on how to welcome and adapt to change for other elements of the governance system at Hudson Valley CU. There was an increased level of trust attained between members of the nominations sub-committee and the CEO—primarily through the CEO’s participation in the nominations process, but also as an extension of the still-developing constructive partnership between the board, supervisory committee and CEO/management. All the volunteers—board and committee members—gained a new and enhanced understanding of their capabilities and, despite initial trepidations, developed a significantly greater appreciation for the upsides of transformational change. The previous governance committee and the old nominations committee combined in an integrated model to become the new governance and nominations committee. This provides the credit union with the structure, know-how and horsepower to better meet its members’ needs given its size and complexity. Lesso ns Learned Include everyone in the discussions, right from the start—board members, supervisory committee members, nominations committee members, the CEO—when you’re a) discussing why and how you want to change the nomination process; and b) what the ideal board or supervisory/audit committee of the future looks like for your credit union. Cast your net wide for new candidates and volunteers. Ensure that every candidate attaches a resume or curriculum vitae to their submitted application. And be sure that you update your application to obtain the information that you need—in alignment with your call for candidates. Don’t assume that your current board and supervisory committee members are the right members for the future. Vet them as thoroughly and fully as you vet your new candidates—and against the same requirements. Prepare both the volunteers on your nominations committee and your incumbents for navigating emotionally hard decisions. Meeting the requirements of creating the board and supervisory/audit committee of the future may necessitate the departure of a long-term volunteer colleague. Ensure that the roles and responsibilities for your volunteer positions are clear, including the time commitment. Even with all the communications shared with the Hudson Valley CU candidates, several candidates expressed surprise at the level of commitment required after joining. It doesn’t have to be perfect right out of the gate. Not every tool you develop or innovation you incorporate will immediately work flawlessly. And that’s okay. Keep experimenting. One example: We developed a scoring sheet for the nominations sub-committee that ended up being more of a hindrance than a help. It was quickly set aside, and the members of the sub-committee moved on. Balance urgency and patience. A member of the governance and nominations committee admitted wishing they had developed an associate board member program years ago. But there had been resistance, and it was shelved. When the proposal was introduced last year as a part of these innovations, the practice was enthusiastically adopted. Change takes time. Prioritize equity, diversity and inclusion. Ensure that your credit union is aware of how systemic inequalities adversely affect society—and your credit union. This conscious commitment to equity will enhance organizational decision-making, lead to greater diversity around the leadership table, and help directors and executives alike develop a more inclusive, shared understanding of what everyone has to say and contribute. Alexander Stein, Ph.D . , is founder of Dolus Advisors , a consultancy that helps leaders address psychologically complex organizational challenges. Previous Next

< Back Some New Remote 'Norms' Are Here To Stay Michael Daigneault and Gisele Manole Aug 25, 2020 Five tips for a successful pivot to virtual board meetings At a recent credit union board retreat, we asked the group (a mix of board members and executive leadership); “How do you think the post-COVID-19 world will be different from the pre-COVID-19 world?” The answers were varied and included: More of the workforce will work remotely Better overall hygiene practices Less brick-and-mortar retail and other traditional storefront businesses Increased consolidation of the credit union field Fewer major airlines and fewer travelers We ask this question because, as they say, “the genie is out of the bottle” on so many of our new norms and behaviors. Our businesses and our culture have made a sharp turn to adapt to new laws about social distancing—a foreign concept just a few months ago. This pandemic has accelerated our transition into the digital realm. Which of the changes that we have made are likely to stick? Which ones should we adapt to craft the “new normal”? Perhaps the most immediate change our boards have had to make is switching to virtual meetings. So many boards are asking us and themselves if and how can they effectively and meaningfully conduct their work virtually? Quantum has had to make some changes along these same lines. While the majority of our work is conducted remotely, our facilitated retreats, often considered the pivotal “aha!” moment for many of our clients, had to be reinvented as virtual experiences. It was a daunting challenge but one that we attacked as a team composed of different strengths, talents and experiences. Some of us are more confident with new technologies than others. And then there was a sense of mourning for the loss of our in-person retreats. We had invested so much of ourselves over eight long years and hundreds of thousands of miles to fine-tuning our practices. Who are we without our flip charts, big stickies and colorful illustrations? How did we pivot? We practiced … a lot! We spent countless hours choreographing and rehearsing for our first virtual retreat. It is safe to say that we have successfully pivoted now that a number of our clients have commented, “I think this was actually a much better format for our retreat. We were so focused and got so much accomplished in a shorter period of time!” And, “This (virtual retreat) raised the board’s governance IQ but also our video conferencing and communication skills which will make us stronger, too.” Here are a few best practices that this short and intense period of adjustment has taught us about teamwork and conducting successful virtual meetings: While we are limited to only a virtual meeting format, make it the best possible experience. Be present just as you would be if you were seated in the same room with your colleagues. Make sure your video is on, that your face is well lit, that your sound is strong with no background noise or distractions, and that you are knowledgeable about how to use whichever conferencing platform you are using, such as Zoom or Google Meet. Come prepared in every other way and review in advance the board materials you were provided in advance. It may seem like common sense, but many board members still treat virtual meetings like “board meeting light,” as if they are in a holding pattern until they can meet in person again. This experience of continuing to operate and indeed grow your organization in a pandemic has likely already provided you with opportunities to conduct vital business and make board-level decisions remotely. If it hasn’t already, it will. Your loyalty to the mission of your credit union and your responsibilities as board members are the same today as they were in the pre-COVID-19 world. Have a focused agenda and aim to keep your virtual meetings to about 90 minutes. (We think two hours is the max.) Participation can fall off a cliff if a video conference goes on too long ... we have all been there! Consider meeting for more than one session if you need more than 90 minutes. Keep your agenda tight while leaving room for strategic discussion. It is a delicate balance and requires excellent meeting facilitation by the chair and active participation by the rest of the board. Use all of the tools available to you on whichever video conferencing platform you use , including “breakout rooms” for small groups and strategic discussions, “polling” (which is a great way to efficiently get a Five-Finger Consensus ) and the “chat” feature (which, used appropriately, is a great way to take the pulse of your entire group in record time.) Remember that teamwork is essential. Everyone has to be “all in” on the virtual experience and 100% committed to your meeting’s purpose. The pandemic crisis has been a gut check for leaders in the credit union community. Having a deep bench of various talents, experiences and cultures has never been more important. Perhaps nothing is a complete substitute for “breaking bread” and the ways that in-person meetings, practices and rituals build community and culture. However, think about how a hybrid model of virtual meetings (when done well) and in-person meetings (with social distancing, masks and hand sanitizer) can help you to expand the reach of your board recruitment and diversify your membership. As we continue to adjust to the post-COVID-19 “new normal,” the most important lesson is to remain nimble; don’t be afraid to try new things and accept that experimentation will lead to some failures, but ultimately to success as well. Previous Next

< Back Who Needs A Shadow Board? Jennie Boden Jun 25, 2024 Add younger employees and members directly to your C-suite and board to benefit from their skills and knowledge today. I read with interest a Fortune article entitled “ Companies are turning to ‘Shadow Boards’ to keep in touch with the real world .” The author, Lila MacLellan, defines a shadow board as “a committee of typically younger employees who come together within a firm to advise the management team on key topics, such as company culture, product marketing, trends in technology, and sustainability efforts.” She continues, noting “They are not an official board, of course, but their views often supplement those of experienced, much older corporate directors and C-suite leaders. “These advisory groups give some businesses insight into their customers’ tastes and passions.” MacLellan reported that companies like The Body Shop have embraced the trend, and her colleague, Fortune ’s Orianna Rosa Royle, recently found that The Body Shop developed its shadow board, with its members aged 30 and under, “when it became aware of the gap between the company’s youngest workers and its leadership team and directors.” After reading the article, a colleague of mine posed a logical question: “Would shadow boards be a good strategy for credit union?” The question made sense. After all, our own 2023 State of Credit Union Governance recently found that 89% of credit union board members are aged 51 or older, and the average age of most credit union members in North America is 53. But here’s the thing. Creating another board isn’t a ready-made solution to the problems of an aging board and membership. In my mind, it’s simply a workaround. In our work, we’ve found that most credit unions struggle managing the governing boards that they already have. Many credit union boards have failed to evolve their governing roles and responsibilities even as their credit unions have grown around them—from financial institutions with assets of $250 million to those with well over $1 billion; some face challenges with that ever-elusive balance of authority between the board and the CEO and still others are still lingering “in the weeds” too much, not finding their stride in being strategic thinkers. Marie Kondo has ushered in the era of “tidying up,” not “cluttering up.” You must attend to that which you have, and like I said, too many governing boards are already flying under the radar, receiving too little attention. Why add another? Instead, add those younger employees and members directly into your C-suite and onto your governing boards— of course, given that they meet the requisite qualifications . Don’t keep them waiting in the wings until they reach some magical age where you deem them acceptable for full service. Benefit from their skills and knowledge now. A Gen Z member of our team recently sat in on a webinar proclaiming to share insights into the mind of the Gen Z credit union member. It was taught by two individuals in their 50s. In. Their. 50s. To be fair, our team member said they got some things right, but they also got a lot of things wrong. After, we asked her to present to our team what she thought that members of her generation were looking for from their financial institutions. You know what she said? Hope. To learn more about what Gen Zers really think, read this May blog from Quantum Governance’s governance administrator, Lauren Paradise. Previous Next

< Back The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018: Six Key Findings Michael Daigneault and Jennie Boden Jan 23, 2018 Use them to increase your board’s focus and effectiveness. We’ve been regularly surveying credit union board members, supervisory (“audit”) committee members, CEOs and senior staff on the executive team for the past five years. And for as many years as we’ve been surveying them, we’ve dreamed about the notion of pulling together a “state of the state” of credit union governance report—both to forward our own understanding of broad trends we’re seeing in the field, and also so that we can share the combined results with you, our friends, colleagues and clients in the credit union community. The culmination of that dream is The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018: Five Data-Driven Recommendations for Future Success . Today, we are pleased to share the report’s key findings with you. We hope that they will challenge you to increase the focus on effectiveness of governance and leadership at your organization—all toward the betterment of your credit union and its members. Key Findings We identified six key findings in total: Board members and CEOs have differing perceptions of governance . Their answers differ on 84 percent of the survey’s 21 key questions, fundamental to good governance—with the exception of the Supervisory Committee survey section, where there is more agreement. (Please note: Percentages throughout the report are rounded up to the nearest decimal; therefore, figures may not total 100 percent.) Board member and CEO perceptions diverge based on tenure. Board members who have served on their boards for a long time have more positive views concerning governance than those board members who have less tenure. Conversely, CEOs with longer tenures tend to be more negative than CEOs with shorter tenures. Bigger really may be better. For 18 of the 21 key questions asked, board members and CEOs of credit unions with assets of $1 billion or greater had survey scores that were statistically significantly higher overall (and therefore more positive views of the CU’s overall governance) than those credit unions with assets ranging from $500 million to $999 million. That is, larger credit unions tend to rate their governance practices higher than those of smaller credit unions. Credit unions that don’t undertake a more comprehensive assessment may have a skewed perception. Those credit unions that participated in survey-only assessments, opting not to include interviews, a document review and a retreat as a part of their process, tended to have more positive scores in many of the areas that we assessed. While the exact reasons for this more rosy viewpoint are unknown, it is a finding that is of genuine concern: Such a skewed—overly positive—viewpoint could cause some credit unions not to take corrective actions when, in fact, some action may be prudent. Respondents are concerned about recruiting future board members. Survey participants expressed concern with the board’s ability to attract the right people to serve on the board in the future, with a full 46 percent of respondents describing their effectiveness in finding, recruiting and nominating new talent as only adequate or less than adequate. CEOs and senior staff perceive lower levels of trust. Just 27 percent of senior staff and 25 percent of CEOs reported that their boards were very effective at building a leadership culture of trust, compared to 53 percent of supervisory committee members and 44 percent of board members. Previous Next

The Four Elements of Good Governance Resources Finding Balance in Board Meetings Efficiency vs. Engagement Read More What Key Factor May Be Working Against Your Interest in Raising Board Engagement and Accountability Discover the hidden factor sabotaging your board's engagement and accountability, and learn how to address it effectively. Read More The Sophisticated Art of Ensuring Your Board Grows Alongside Your Credit Union Four areas to focus on. Read More Is Your Organizational Success An Accident? New study suggests where to look for the answer. Read More Why Directors Are Chess Pieces, Not Checkers Every director should be ‘chair material’—even if they wouldn’t make a good chair. Read More Building Your Associate Board Member Program, From The Philosophy Up The groundwork for success includes commitment from the start. Read More Advice from My Hero Six key responsibilities of every board, gleaned from my conversation with world-renowned expert Ram Charan. Read More The Learning Board Three key building blocks Read More Creating a 'Wow' Credit Union Board Meeting How to Take Your Meetings to the Next Level Read More 'Quantum' Board Engagement Six questions to help you more fully get your board engaged Read More Board Engagement Needs A Boost Strategies to use in your monthly meetings Read More

< Back Nine Leadership Challenges Michael Daigneault Mar 25, 2015 The board of the future will need the strength to overcome these. At Quantum Governance, we’ve been taking a look at what the credit union board of the future will look like and, almost more importantly, the challenges it will face. Ultimately, we have identified nine key challenges that are already (or will be) confronting your leadership. The Composition Challenge. Gone are the days when your credit union can simply rely on a nice cross section of its membership to fill open slots on its board. The most progressive boards today are actively recruiting the talent they need; identifying the skill sets that deliver the talent, connections and expertise they need on the board; and then inviting those individuals to become members of the credit union. The Technology Challenge . The rate of technology is changing at lightening speed. I don’t have to tell you that. But here’s the thing. It’s changing at a faster rate than anything else we’ve ever seen. Faster than political change, business change and even social change in our world. Is your board ready? Is the credit union? The Community Challenge. The very notion of community is being altered by technology. Community is ceasing to be largely defined by geography and more often it’s defined as a sense of belonging. How does that impact your “community” credit union? Indeed, as a credit union member myself, I haven’t set foot in a local branch for more than a decade. What does that mean for your business? Is your board discussing the impact of this from a strategic point of view? The Disruptors . How many of you have heard of Uber? Five years ago, could you have ever conceived of an online reservation ride service? I’m sure the taxi companies in nearly 130 American cities never dreamed their business could tumble by more than 65 percent in just one year, like it did in San Francisco. Uber wasn’t even on the radar then. What’s not on your radar now? It’s difficult to know. And that’s the point. You won’t know. More than 99 percent of the disruptors will fail, but it will only take one to succeed and have a dramatic impact on your credit union’s business. The Demographics Challenge. We love Baby Boomers. First, there are lots of them. Eighty million of them, and they are doers. Board service has been a part of their DNA. But what about the next generation: Generation X? Much has been said about them and most of it hasn’t been good. I happen to think they are doers, too. And very civic-minded, but in a different way. Their way of giving back is more individualistic. When they want to get involved, it’s more on a one-on-one basis. When they want to make a difference, they start their own organizations … forge their own path. And critically, there are 40 million fewer people in Generation X than there are Baby Boomers. If you think you’re having a tough time finding good, qualified and engaged board members now, it’s about to get harder. The Information Challenge. With your iPad and your smartphone, you probably have more information at your fingertips than the entire federal government did 25 years ago. But what matters? What’s important? What information will move your credit union forward? What do you need to know and what is just white noise? One of the key challenges for credit unions is not a lack of information, but rather the volume and variety of data available. The current flood of information can be like trying to satisfy your thirst with a hose attached to a fire hydrant! The Complexity Challenge. This challenge is related to The Information Challenge and every credit union will face it. It’s a distinct moment in time – that moment when the abilities of a credit union board are overcome by the increasing quantity and complexity of credit union regulations, responsibilities and requirements. There is more and more expected of you and your colleagues as directors. The demand for your knowledge base is only continuing to grow. The Risk Challenge. There’s a great book titled Competing for the Future , in which the authors say organizations that “create the future are rebels. They’re subversives. They break the rules…Foresight often comes not from being a better forecaster, but from being less hide-bound.” It comes from breaking free from your mold, from taking more risks. Is your credit union board “hide-bound?” Are you stuck? My guess is that you and your board colleagues spend more time on the lower end of the risk spectrum – most credit union boards do. But, if you’re going to grow … if you’re going to forge the future, maybe even be a credit union disruptor yourself, you’ll need to learn how to effectively balance two abilities: 1) understanding, identifying and mitigating risks to the credit union; and 2) tolerating the risk that will enable you to grow. The Impact Challenge. It’s not enough to keep your head down and do good work. You have to not only keep your head up, but you have to get out. The Impact Challenge requires that you foster relationships, as leaders and always in constructive partnership with your CEO, with external stakeholders to have the greatest impact. And that goes far beyond your membership to include governmental representatives, local businesses and, yes, even other credit unions. To face these nine challenges successfully, your board will need to regularly strengthen its leadership and governance abilities. You can do it! Previous Next

< Back Balancing Impartiality With Voting Michael Daigneault and Caitlin Hatch Apr 1, 2019 A best practice for chairs is to help the board look at the big picture while still having a specific opinion. At the September 2018 Board Chair Development Seminar , we asked the more than 60 attendees from all over the United States and Canada to share with us whether their board chairs voted on regular matters. By a show of hands, a slight majority of the attendees said their chairs do not regularly vote during board meetings—except to break ties. In fact, one leader indicated that his CU had placed this prohibition against voting by the chair—except in the case of ties—into its governance policy. A number of chairs were quite passionate about refraining from board votes. Their passion appeared to flow from a strong desire to ensure that they not exert any undue influence over their colleagues on the board. For others, the abstinence (unless in the case of a tie) was a strong belief that the practice supported key values of a chair’s impartiality, as well as his or her primary role as a fair and balanced facilitator of board processes rather than a participant in them. Another attendee suggested that his CU’s current practice was based on Robert’s Rules of Order, a widely used reference for meeting procedure and business rules in the English-speaking world. What Does Robert’s Rules Say? While most leaders of credit unions that use Robert’s Rules believe they understand them, few have genuinely studied them. That is because the guidelines in the book are amazingly complex and intended to be a reference book for “an answer to any question of parliamentary procedure that may be met with,” according to one of the many editions, Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised in Brief . Even the Robert’s Rules Association admits the overload of information in the guide: “At least 80 percent of the content [of the most recent version] will be needed less than 20 percent of the time.” Notably, the position of Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised in Brief on board chairs voting is clear. They can vote on all matters coming to the board: “If the President [Robert’s Rules also explicitly recognizes “Chairs” to be the same as “Presidents”] is a member of the voting body, he or she has exactly the same rights and privileges as all other members have, including the right to make motions, to speak in debate, and to vote on all questions. So, in meetings of a small Board (where there are not more than a dozen Board members present), and in meetings of a committee, the presiding officer may exercise these rights and privileges as fully as any other member.” We agree that chairs should not “unduly influence” their colleagues, but simply voting on board matters does not constitute undue influence. Impartiality is also important for chairs as they facilitate board meetings. But, let’s be clear about what impartiality really means. Elect individuals to the role of chair who can be fair, objective facilitators. … If you are concerned about undue influence, consider casting votes privately to limit the influence of the chair. Merriam-Webster states that “partial to” or “partial toward” someone or something is to be somewhat biased or prejudiced, which means that a person who is partial really only sees part of the whole picture. Thus, to be impartial is to try to see “the whole picture.” To allow everyone to see the whole picture, it is incumbent upon your credit union’s board chair to remain unbiased, fair and unprejudiced in his or her facilitation of the meeting. This doesn’t mean that at the end of the dialogue, your chair isn’t also a full-fledged member of the board with his or her own beliefs, perspectives and ideas. So, how then do you reconcile the board chair voting and maintaining his or her impartiality? The answer lies in the important difference between the actual content of the matters being discussed and the impartiality and fairness of the facilitation process utilized to transparently discuss the content. As such, a board chair’s impartiality isn’t about him or her not having a personal opinion, it’s about him or her not wielding authority in a biased, unfair or prejudiced manner that only forwards his or her own perspective. A board chair has one vote like each and every one of his or her colleagues (except, like all of the other members of the board, in the obvious case of a personal conflict of interest or when there is insufficient information to make an informed decision), but we would be naïve to suggest that the chair position carries with it no persuasive influence. Accordingly, he or she must work diligently to facilitate the board meeting (or voting process) in a way that allows all voices to be genuinely heard, whether or not they agree with the majority’s—or chair’s—point of view. Remember to be careful out there … the mark of a true leader is the capacity and will to rally other people to a common purpose and a character that inspires confidence and trust. It’s the ability of a leader (such as a chair) to inspire followership over the long haul. It’s not that a chair must ensure that everyone falls “into line” behind a single, unanimous vote, and it’s certainly not the ability to ensure that everyone on the board always votes in agreement with the chair. Ultimately, it’s the ability of a chair to be both an effective board member—with his or her own thoughts and opinions—while simultaneously, fairly and impartially facilitating an appropriate discussion. That is one mark of a truly great board chair. Steps to Consider Taking So, what can you do to balance your chair’s right (and fiduciary duty) to vote with the need to maintain impartiality and encourage open dialogue? Consider the following: Elect individuals to the role of chair who can be fair, objective facilitators. This may be easier said than done. But it’s important. Many credit unions have simply adopted a rolling officer succession plan. Don’t. Be thoughtful about who you put into such leadership positions as the chair. Ask the chair to share his/her thoughts at the close of the discussion, not at the beginning. This may take some diligence on the part of the chair. But it can be done, and once it is done regularly, it can and should become part of your credit union’s meeting culture. It is often a good practice for the chair to also try to fairly summarize the key points of the dialogue before a vote is taken—particularly if it has been an extended discussion. If you are concerned about undue influence, consider casting votes privately to limit the influence of the chair—as well as any other board members. If the vote is not a private ballot, the chair’s vote should be rendered last. Again, board meeting cultures can change. It might take time, but if your chair hasn’t been casting a vote, a shifting of this type may be easier to make than you think. Caitlin Hatch previously served as a senior consultant with Quantum Governance and has worked with credit unions for the past eight years, focusing on governance and strategic planning. Prior to that, she served for 25 years as general counsel and corporate secretary for the largest anthracite coal company in the United States. Previous Next

< Back Hudson Valley Credit Union’s Call for Board Candidates Refresh Jennie Boden and Dr. Alexander Stein Feb 1, 2022 As part of its board recruitment renewal project, Hudson Valley CU developed a call for candidates that outlined specific attributes that matched its changing governance needs and values. Before Nominations are being accepted through Nov. 1 for our 2020 Board of Directors Election. Board members are volunteers elected by the credit union membership and are responsible for the general direction of the credit union, leading us forward and positioning the credit union to respond to members’ future needs. Directors must carry out their duties in the best interest of the membership, conforming to all applicable rules and regulations, as well as sound business practices. Members with strong backgrounds in a variety of fields are needed, including business, finance or investments, human resources, marketing or information technology. A director must have a working familiarity with basic finance and accounting practices, including the ability to read and understand the credit union’s balance sheet and income statement. Board members volunteer an average of 10-15 hours per month to credit union business and are also required to attend a monthly meeting in Poughkeepsie, New York, as well as serve on one or two additional committees. After Nominations are being accepted now through Feb. 25 for the Hudson Valley Credit Union 2021 Board of Directors. Our Board members are volunteers elected by the credit union membership and responsible for working in partnership with our Management Team to lead the credit union to mission success: to create financial security and a better quality of life. Our Board provides governance and leadership; visionary, strategic direction; and fiduciary oversight, and we’re looking for members who are experienced critical and strategic thinkers, with a keen ability to focus on the future. If you are independent-minded but can also work to build consensus among a group of diverse people, we need your skills! And, while you don’t need a degree in finance, you do need to be comfortable reading financial statements and analyzing organizations from a strategic point of view. We are a fast-growing credit union, with a commitment to good governance and acting with integrity. If you think you have the right mix of skills, talents and attributes, can commit to an average of 10-15 hours per month in service of our credit union, plus attend a monthly meeting in Poughkeepsie, New York, and serve on at least one of our board-level committees, visit our website at hvcu.org . Alexander Stein, Ph.D . , is founder of Dolus Advisors , a consultancy that helps leaders address psychologically complex organizational challenges. Previous Next

< Back Taking Action On Credit Unions’ No. 1 Director Recruitment Priority: Diversity. Jennie Boden Sep 21, 2020 The credit union and women’s movements are clearly doing something right. But we still have a long way to go. The day after Kamala Harris was picked by Joe Biden as his running mate, I was talking with a colleague of mine about his choice. I have to note that the colleague in question is a woman, and she is about 10 years younger than me. She was lamenting that everyone in the media was focusing on the fact that Ms. Harris was a woman and, of course, a woman of color. From her point of view, as someone from a younger generation, why should this be the news? She sees Ms. Harris as a qualified, strong candidate for the position, regardless of her sex or ethnicity. In my colleague’s mind, of course she would have been in serious contention for the job. It started me thinking about what my sister would say as someone who is 10 years older than me. She was in college in the ’70s, and I remember her then with long, straight hair, playing sad Joni Mitchell songs on her stereo and challenging my father, the minister, on nearly everything he said. She would bring with her the perspective of history: knowledge of the years when women struggled to have a voice in their marriages, let alone a seat in the boardroom, and of the racial struggles that plagued even my small hometown in rural Pennsylvania when she was in love with an African-American boy in high school. Then my mind moved on to my niece. She is 10 years younger than my colleague . She’s a graduate of Stanford University, recently married to man whose parents immigrated from India, and studying to be a doctor at one of the best medical schools in the country—maybe the world (University of California-San Francisco). Now, at this point, it should be noted that I write from a point of great advantage, and the cast of characters in this article also enjoy great advantages. We all hail from stable families, where shelter, food and love were plenty. We are all well-educated. We are all white. So, what does this have to do with credit unions? And, specifically, with governance, since that’s my area of specialty? My biggest fear in all of the focus on DEI is that it will remain a discussion point and not become a point of action for us all. - Jennie Boden I had two thoughts immediately after the conversation with my colleague and my ensuing reflections about my sister and niece. The first was around the notion of board renewal. We talk about the topic all the time at Quantum Governance, and we’re finding that credit union boards are increasingly talking about it, too. It used to be that credit union board members would join the board and stay for years—for decades, even. I’ve had a client who had two board members who served until they died in their 80s or 90s. Others explained odd behavior by noting that a few of their board members were displaying early signs of dementia. And so, the first rule of board renewal is that you must renew, for the health of your board. It’s the board’s responsibility to ensure that you do. The guiding principle for board renewal is to find a healthy balance of historical continuity and renewal. I celebrate that my colleague just assumes that Kamala Harris is right for the job of vice president and that my niece sees a horizon as wide as possible for herself and all those around her. (And I also imagine what will be available, once they are grown, to my great-nieces.) But, it’s also critical for all of us, as women, to realize from whence we’ve come. My sister’s perspective is valuable, too. She reminded me recently that when she was growing up, girls were shut out completely from sports in high school, and today we have a woman coaching in the NFL. How far we have come, but still, how far we have to go… Ensure that your board is balancing these perspectives—all of them. Historical continuity will give you important points of view on the past, and renewal will open future possibilities the likes of which you’ve never conceived. The second thought that came to mind following the conversation with my colleague arose directly from the research that we published in The State of Credit Union Governance, 2020 report. For the first time ever, we found that demographic diversity was the No. 1 recruiting priority among credit union board members and leaders, surpassing financial literacy for the first time. Source: The State of Credit Union Governance, 2020 We also reported the news that the average credit union boards have nine members, three of which (36%) are women! On its face, this may not seem significant, but it is. In comparison, a 2018 study by Deloitte and The Alliance for Board Diversity of America of Fortune 100 companies found that women held only 25% of their board seats. And in 2018, CUNA found that 52% of credit union CEOs are female, compared to only 5% in commercial banks and 6% in Fortune 500 companies. And it’s not just among the small credit unions: At credit unions with between $1 billion and $3 billion in assets, more than 14% of the CEOs were female, compared to just more than 3% of bank CEOs. As a movement (both a credit union and a women’s movement), we’re clearly doing something right. But we still have a long way to go. It seems that today, everyone is talking about “DEI” or diversity, equity and inclusion. (Note that Quantum Governance believes the appropriate order is “ EDI ,” given that the notion of equity is a broader concept that underlies both diversity and inclusion.) It’s a most worthy discussion, and it’s been a long time coming. My biggest fear in all of the focus on DEI is that it will remain a discussion point and not become a point of action for us all. But clearly, we know how to do this. We’ve started to make true inroads in terms of integrating women into the boardrooms and C-suites of America—at least among our credit unions. Be sure not to let up on that focus. Rather, let’s add to it. While we can celebrate the gains made for women, we’ve not moved the needle one bit on increasing the number of visible minorities in the credit union boardroom or C-suite, and that’s just as important. In fact, remember, demographic diversity is now the No. 1 recruiting priority among credit union board members and leaders. How much richer would your board be if 50% of its members were women? If you had true diversity in terms of ethnic and racial background? In terms of age and tenure? In terms of skills and experience? How much more stirring would the conversations in your boardroom be if you were truly open to listening to everyone’s voices? Previous Next

Governance Resources Finding Balance in Board Meetings Efficiency vs. Engagement Read More What Key Factor May Be Working Against Your Interest in Raising Board Engagement and Accountability Discover the hidden factor sabotaging your board's engagement and accountability, and learn how to address it effectively. Read More In Search Of The Strategic Board Discover how credit union boards can become agile strategic partners and lead their institutions to future success. Read More Who Needs A Shadow Board? Add younger employees and members directly to your C-suite and board to benefit from their skills and knowledge today. Read More The Need for Evolution: One of Today’s Central Governance Challenges If your credit union has grown have you re-considered the balance of authority between your board and CEO? Read More Hope for Gen Z Comes in the Shape of Credit Unions Generation Z has the potential to be the greatest credit union generation, so why are so many credit unions struggling to get their attention? Read More Make Your Voice Heard Speaking up can be scary, especially if you’re the only woman in the room, but it’s important to call attention to problematic behavior in the workplace. Read More Gender Equity In The Boardroom: We're Not Done Yet Boards still have work to do to support their female directors and wider DEI&B efforts. Read More Leadership Matters: Choosing Humility Acknowledge your power in the workplace and strive to have open and humble conversations that encourage other voices to be heard. Read More Dealing with Divisive Directors Honor the principle of democratic member control even when you need to remove a board member. Read More Does A Divided Vote Make You A Divided Board? A divided vote makes you a human board. And it’s what you do afterward that matters most. Read More A Cautionary Tale of Risk Management in This Time of Bank Failures Defining roles and responsibilities and continuing education help ensure appropriate coverage. Read More Know When It’s Time To Go Holding onto your board position may be best for you, but what’s best for your credit union? Read More The Sophisticated Art of Ensuring Your Board Grows Alongside Your Credit Union Four areas to focus on. Read More Is Your Organizational Success An Accident? New study suggests where to look for the answer. Read More Defining Consensus 'Five finger consensus' allows all directors to weigh in on key decisions. Read More On Being the Female Chair Leading a Predominately Male Board Two female board leaders share their experiences and advice for promoting good governance—especially, but not only, as representatives of a minority demographic. Read More How Using a Recruiter Can Boost Board Succession Planning Efforts Approaching director searches like executive searches can produce great results. Read More More Listening, Less Mansplaining In the boardroom and everywhere, it's important to hear all voices. Read More The Playground Bully Grows Up Who are the workplace bullies, and what can we do about them? Read More A Continuously Bigger and Better Box Like a nautilus, Hudson Valley Credit Union’s board evolves beautifully into its next stage of governance. Read More Hudson Valley Credit Union’s Call for Board Candidates Refresh As part of its board recruitment renewal project, Hudson Valley CU developed a call for candidates that outlined specific attributes that matched its changing governance needs and values. Read More Key Outcomes And Lessons Learned From A Board Renewal Effort An analysis of Hudson Valley CU’s work to revise key governance processes. Read More Why Directors Are Chess Pieces, Not Checkers Every director should be ‘chair material’—even if they wouldn’t make a good chair. Read More Mentoring … Because If We Don’t, Who Will? Supporting other women as they advance is important. Read More Are Women Better Leaders? They are when they act with humility, self-awareness, self-control, moral sensitivity and kindness. Read More Serving Members’ Best Interests Benefits From A Constructive Partnership When directors, supervisory committee members and executives collaborate effectively, members benefit. Read More Parity In The Boardroom Takes Patience, Planning And Process But putting in the effort can definitely make a difference. Read More Building Your Associate Board Member Program, From The Philosophy Up The groundwork for success includes commitment from the start. Read More Women In Football, Politics And Credit Union Boardrooms It’s important to prioritize and value diversity. Read More Transitions of Power A perfect time to re-evaluate your organization and its direction is when a key leadership shift is on the horizon. Read More Reimagining Your Board Meetings To make your gatherings more effective and engaging, first look at the real reasons boards meet. Read More RIP RBG: The Thin, Strong String That Ties Women Together Our foremothers paved the way for us; now we pave the way for the women now coming of age. Read More Taking Action On Credit Unions’ No. 1 Director Recruitment Priority: Diversity. The credit union and women’s movements are clearly doing something right. But we still have a long way to go. Read More Some New Remote 'Norms' Are Here To Stay Five tips for a successful pivot to virtual board meetings Read More Weaving a Single Garment of Destiny The key threads include equity, diversity and inclusion. All three are needed for the best leadership and governance for your credit union. Read More Embracing our New (Virtual) Reality The new virtual reality is changing the way we do business. Read More Governance Committee – If You Don’t Have One, Get One! Governance Committees can help ensure boards are running smoothly. Read More Into the COVID-19 Fire to Make Things Better for Members and Staff A strong alignment of the CEO, senior leaders and the board enabled early, effective action. Read More The State Of Credit Union Governance 2020: A Summary Read More Did You Dust Off Your Old Pandemic Plan? Key ideas about response oversight and future strategy Read More The Importance Of A Truly Independent Supervisory Committee If you’re shifting to an ‘audit’ committee instead, be careful not to sacrifice independent oversight at the altar of efficiency. Read More The Concept of ‘Constructive Partnership’ Collaboration, more than control, fuels today’s high-performing boards. Read More Coming Together for the Common Good Consider multiple perspectives and build consensus— not unanimity—to ensure your CU is making good decisions. Read More Being Chair Is More Challenging Than You Think In addition to playing an important role in managing the CEO, the chairman also plays a key role in managing the board itself. Read More Board Liaisons Direct Directors and Staff Toward Good Governance Generally keeping things organized and on track is no small feat—and it’s an important one. Read More The Board And The CEO Should Play Doubles Tennis The constructive partnership between directors and the chief executive is a lot like teammates on one side of the court. Read More Balancing Impartiality With Voting A best practice for chairs is to help the board look at the big picture while still having a specific opinion. Read More Advice from My Hero Six key responsibilities of every board, gleaned from my conversation with world-renowned expert Ram Charan. Read More What to Do When Communication Styles Clash: Embrace It Building a culture of inclusivity helps ensure each voice on your board is heard. Read More Effective Communications in the Board Room Key Findings for Communication Read More Many Board Problems Boil Down to Communications Challenges Directors need to ask good, hard questions—to ‘trust but verify’ in a respectful and professional manner—all toward the good of the credit union. Read More Two Of The Five Top Questions Board Chairs Have 1. Should chairs vote? 2. What’s the best way to ask a director to move on? Read More A New Credit Union Model with Classic Principles Focuses on Social Purpose Reclaim the ‘why’ of credit unions by deeply embedding social purpose in all your activities. Read More Get Your House in Order—Now, If Need Be There is no ‘wrong’ time to deal with fundamental governance issues. Read More Closing the Board/Management Trust Gap 5 ways to unite staff and volunteers for good governance Read More Millennials Are Many Things, Including Your Future Board Leaders Getting to know them can aid your recruiting. Read More Tell Me Something I Don’t Know: What You Need to Know About Assessments Solid financials aren’t necessarily a sign of a high-performance board. Read More Who's on Your Board Today? Tomorrow? The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018 report finds credit unions are more certain of their current mix of directors than they are about the future composition of their boards. Here’s what this means for board renewal. Read More 5 Data-Driven Recommendations for Governance Success Core Recommendations from a New Report Read More The State of Credit Union Governance, 2018: Six Key Findings Use them to increase your board’s focus and effectiveness. Read More Understanding the Importance of Ethics Principled leadership is a vital part of any cooperative’s DNA. Read More A Case for Reaching Higher Musings on the Federal Reserve’s proposed guidance on supervisory expectation for boards Read More Assessing Staff's Strategic Planning Path The challenge is helping front-line credit union folks see the big picture. Read More Great Things from the Great North Three overarching Canadian principles that can be applied universally Read More Help Your New Chair Move Up Here's what a top board leader needs to know to be successful—and what you need to know to help. Read More ERM Is Everyone's Responsibility 10 steps to take to ensure your leadership is doing all it can to identify and manage risk Read More The Ever-Elusive Millennial Director Tailor your message and medium in recruiting younger board members. Read More Resolutions for a New Year Taking the Opportunity to Make Changes Read More The Benefits of Board Committees Get the most out of them by applying these bright ideas. Read More Supervisory Committees Function Well, But... Just like CUs and their boards, supervisory committees must change with the times. Read More A Matter of Leadership CUs need to pave a new road to ensure a strong, high-performing board over time. Read More Nine Leadership Challenges The board of the future will need the strength to overcome these. Read More When It Comes to Board Meetings... We can do better. Read More No Higher Calling The challenge of effective CEO evaluation Read More The Learning Board Three key building blocks Read More Creating a 'Wow' Credit Union Board Meeting How to Take Your Meetings to the Next Level Read More 'Quantum' Board Engagement Six questions to help you more fully get your board engaged Read More Board Engagement Needs A Boost Strategies to use in your monthly meetings Read More A Matter of Culture What drives yours? Here are 10 elements to shoot for in your board room. Read More Surfacing Assumptions Knowing what you're assuming can boost board strategic thinking. Read More Fiduciary AND Strategic Thought Needed Finding the right balance between operational oversight and visionary dialogue in your boardroom is worth the struggle. Read More

< Back Double Your Fun: Tracking Strategic Planning For a Brighter Future Paul Dionne Feb 21, 2025 When it comes to strategic planning, I often start with guidance from Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. Porter was the first to develop a research-based understanding of competitive strategy, and his approach begins with the dramatic premise that operational effectiveness is not a strategy ! Of course, to have a shot at sustainability and success, any enterprise would do well to focus efforts on running an effective shop. But simply improving how you do business is not sufficient to succeed over the long term. Porter’s claim was meant to be provocative because he wanted strategists to avoid falling into the operations trap. The trap is solely focusing on running an effective shop, which can be imitated by competitors all of whom are also working to improve their operations. When you consider immensely larger competitors such as big banks or fintechs, competing on operations alone probably won’t work. I can assure you that your budget and staffing for your new banking app is tiny compared to what Bank of America is spending on theirs. And yes, credit unions certainly want to offer competitive rates to members and potential members, but good rates alone won’t cut it either. Porter notes that firms who rely on operational effectiveness alone will inevitably be outflanked by competitors who can be similarly effective and are also building strategic advantages such as product differentiation and/or a deep focus on meeting the needs of specific consumer segments. Credit unions need to walk and chew gum – they should run an effective shop and also identify, choose and develop a competitive strategy that rests on being different. How can your credit union create unique value for members and potential members that is difficult for others to copy? The Future Demands Strategic Differentiation In strategic planning, credit unions often throw everything into a single process. The outcome can be muddled and end up over-indexed on the side of objectives that seek to improve operational effectiveness. Far less common is a holistic strategic plan that explicitly seeks to achieve competitive advantage. Operational effectiveness is important, but it is not sufficient to ensure future sustainability. What is also really important is figuring out how you are going to connect with new, especially younger members and provide next-generation financial services that fulfill their needs. That is where “running a tight ship” will fall short over the long haul. The credit union of the 20th century (bless our brilliant and creative forebears!) will not survive the 21st century without major upgrades to a competitive strategy and value proposition that speaks meaningfully to members hailing from the 21st century. It is their century, after all. Old fuddie-duddies like me are just living in it until our kids take over. What is to be done? To ensure you are covering both bases and building a clear and coherent strategy, divide your planning into two tracks. Tracking for Success An alternative approach to strategic planning calls for clearly dividing the process into two tracks, one focused on improving operational effectiveness and one devoted to developing long-term strategic advantage. The first takes into account all those analyses and enhancements to identify and leverage efficiencies, strengthen processes, and find ways to match or beat peers on operational metrics. The second track is more focused on changes that will position the credit union for a bright future. Senior Management and the Board should understand both efforts and learn how to support each of them from their unique perspectives. Track One: Operational Effectiveness The first track is always in play and strategy sessions should result in an annual plan for improving operational effectiveness. The key question is: How can we run a tighter ship? The types of questions and initiatives might include: How can we lower our efficiency ratio or NIM? How can we grow inexpensive, longer-term deposits? Is it time for a core conversion? These efforts can be measured, benchmarks set, and KPIs measured by Senior Management with oversight from the Board. Track Two: Competitive Strategy The second track toward building competitive advantage over the long term is where credit unions often fall short. Devote time to this work! Start from your mission and map out where you want to be in 5, 10, 25 years. The key question is: How can we be viable in the future? The types of questions and initiatives are broader and might include: What financial problems will our future members have and how can we help solve them? What makes us truly different from our competitors and how can we strengthen that difference? What should we stop doing to better advance our priorities? This effort is more difficult to measure, but it is critical to long-term success. One example might include an integrated community development approach that combines household financial well-being, targeted “healthy community” philanthropy and small business investment to create a value proposition that promotes robust communities and economic prosperity for all. Don’t fall into the trap of avoiding long term investments into changes that cannot be easily quantified or that will not deliver in a single annual cycle. Advancing strategy requires vision, discipline, and a willingness to sometimes sacrifice short-term gains. Continuity of purpose and effort are critical here. Combine, Measure, Socialize Does a two-track planning process lead to two business plans and scorecards? Ideally not. After the heavy rocks have been identified and set into place, build a combined business plan for the coming year that clearly defines and includes next steps from each track. This is where the work of integrating the two tracks is finalized and where you should build in mutually-reinforcing activities. Metrics and KPIs are essential for first track goals. A combination of metrics and milestones are often more relevant for second track goals. Socializing both the long-term vision and the short-term business plan across the credit union is another important step. Each staff needs to have an understanding of the work to be done and how they can move the needle. By delineating two tracks in your planning process, you will not lose sight of needed reflection and problem-solving for both business and strategic improvements. You get to double your fun. Don’t avoid the challenging work of designing and implementing changes that will create strategic advantage for your credit union over the long term. Adopting the two tracks in your strategic planning process means you will be more directly and clearly addressing the credit union’s short-term needs and opportunities for the coming year and, at the same time, identifying and building a pathway to longer term success. Previous Next

< Back A Continuously Bigger and Better Box Jennie Boden and Dr. Alexander Stein of Dolus Advisors Feb 1, 2022 Like a nautilus, Hudson Valley Credit Union’s board evolves beautifully into its next stage of governance. The nautilus is a shelled sea creature known for renewing itself in a most beautiful fashion. It builds a new chamber inside the cover of its shell, moves out of the compartment in which it has been living, and seals off the old. As it progresses over time, the nautilus creates an amazing spiral shell with many sections. In an ideal world, credit union boards would renew themselves as the nautilus does—building on the old to create a new, more expansive governance space. But how many credit unions engage in conversations about building the next era of board governance? In the 2020 State of Credit Union Governance , we reported that almost 25% of all board members have held their positions for at least 20 years. That’s okay to some extent because historical continuity is good. Institutional knowledge and accrued wisdom are important to tackling today’s complexities. On the other hand, we’ve seen directors who perpetuated a negative culture for decades and boards where members were battling serious age-related health issues. We’ve also seen boards struggle under the weight of training too many newcomers, people with insufficient experience joining the boards of $2 billion credit unions, and recent additions who didn’t understand the difference between governing and managing. How do credit union boards transition to their next stage more like the nautilus—gracefully striking a balance between historical continuity and the next right steps for the board and the organization overall? When leaders at $6.5 billion Hudson Valley Credit Union , Poughkeepsie, New York, decided it was time to take a fresh, top-to-bottom look at the board’s nominations process, we were privileged to accompany them and provide our professional guidance along the way. We are grateful to them for letting us tell you their elegant and effective story of board renewal. “As our credit union continued to grow to over $6 billion, we knew we needed to transform our governance,” says Board Chair Nancy Kappler-Foster, a CUES member. “Through our work with Quantum Governance and Dolus Advisors on increasing the effectiveness of our policies and practices—and in particular the constructive partnership between the board and the CEO—we understood the next step was to focus on the ideal board and supervisory committee of the future and then build a state-of-the-art nominations process to achieve that.” Getting Started Led by Kappler-Foster, the board began by chartering a new governance and nominations committee, integrating the original nominations committee as a subcommittee within a broader governance committee charter; redefining the roles and responsibilities for board members; and reevaluating its board-level committee structure overall. Next, the board examined its entire nominations process from recruiting to onboarding. We facilitated workshops with the board, management and supervisory committee that enabled Hudson Valley CU’s volunteers and management team members to commit to a new process that: Developed an overall vision for the nominations process, attending to group dynamics, tone and culture, trust, psychological safety and, of course, good governance. Leveraged decision science, combining business tactics, technology and behavioral sciences through a collaborative approach to help leaders make optimal, data-driven decisions. Surveyed the decision landscape, identifying and evaluating the credit union’s needs and ultimate goals at the board and supervisory committee levels and forecasting the probable consequences of its decisions. Challenged everyone involved to overcome their biases and blind spots, subordinating their own personal interests to the credit union’s best interests. Valued character in the boardroom as highly as key performance indicators, identifying not only hard skills and expertise but also character traits and attributes to drive the identification and prioritization of candidates. Identifying Needed Skills and Attributes We helped Hudson Valley CU’s leaders clarify the skills and attributes they sought in new board and supervisory committee members. Like many CUs, Hudson Valley CU’s leaders hadn’t revisited their wish list in ages. (See Hudson Valley Credit Union's Call for Board Candidates Refresh for the CU’s “before” and “after” calls for candidates.) We looked to data to guide the way toward a new standard. The 2020 State of Credit Union Governance report found significant differences between what credit unions sought in their candidates and the skills and attributes they actually valued in the boardroom. And Hudson Valley CU was no different. When we surveyed the CU’s board, supervisory committee members and management, we found they had been prioritizing skills in financial literacy, professional services and operations. However, the perceived value of those skills in the boardroom was significantly lower than for human skills like being able to focus on the future, do critical thinking and be independent-minded. We recommended that the CU prioritize (in both its recruitment and nominations processes) what its leaders value most in the boardroom. In actuality, the shift was likely long overdue, as it is for most credit unions. Following an analysis of their survey data and focused work with both the volunteer and management leadership, Hudson Valley CU developed a new call for candidates that delineated specific skills, attributes and character traits that matched the credit union’s changing governance needs, culture and core values—in alignment with what board members actually value in the boardroom. (See sidebar, “Hudson Valley CU’s Call for Candidates Refresh.”) “I was so gratified to see the change in focus from fiduciary- to strategic-related skills for our new board members,” says President/CEO Mary Madden, CCE, a CUES member who has announced her retirement effective Jan. 2, 2023. “As we look to the future and the $10 billion threshold (by 2027), the management team will be looking to our board to ask the hard questions that need to be asked from a strategic point of view, while we’re overseeing the day-to-day operations. Certainly, board members need to continue to be responsive to their fiduciary duties, but strategically, there are a lot of critical, strategic decisions in front of us.” The Candidate Process Historically, Hudson Valley CU used traditional routes for board recruitment—issuing the call for candidates on its website and in member statements and posting it in its branches. The CU’s nominations subcommittee leveraged AVP/PR and Corporate Communications Lisa Morris to help get the word out in new ways. Morris placed ads on LinkedIn, sent word out to the area’s largest chambers of commerce, and conducted outreach through other specialty membership organizations and associations in the CU’s region. For the first time, board members took a more active role in recruiting. All told, Hudson Valley CU received 18 applications for three open seats for its board last year. In the end, new board members came from board and volunteer referrals and Morris’ outreach to the Professionals of Color Network Hudson Valley . Morris believes casting the net wide was a value-add. “Any additional outreach we do as a credit union—whether it’s marketing for a new product or issuing the call for candidates to and through a new association—means we’re reaching potential new members,” she says. A CEO once told Quantum Governance that his board was so concerned that he would “stack the deck” in his favor, he wasn’t even allowed to know how many applications his credit union received in response to the call for candidates. We took the opposite tack, recommending that Hudson Valley CU include Madden in the entire process. As a result, she participated as an ex-officio, non-voting member of the nominations subcommittee, lending her decades of expertise in interviewing, evaluating and vetting high-level professional candidates. “At first, we were all a bit skeptical about including Mary in the process,” said Julie Majak, the current chair of Hudson Valley CU’s nominations subcommittee. “But having her participate was an important, positive change. After we reminded ourselves that she had a voice—not a vote—we all quickly moved on to benefit greatly from our CEO’s expertise and insights. Her participation is now a given moving forward.” We also recommended the nominations subcommittee add a peer evaluation for any incumbent candidates, as well as psychometric testing in the form of the EverthingDISC Workplace Profile and expand interviews from 20 minutes to an hour. We also helped the committee develop strategic interview question sets to be used for all candidates to test the issues most important to the credit union. Importantly, the nominations subcommittee approached each interview with a new, elevated perspective of what was required and a clear understanding of what the board was looking for in new volunteers. We recommended Hudson Valley CU use a five-point scale for evaluating candidates based on the outcome of the assessment. Future board members should be: skilled enough to be board chair (even though it might never be right for them to be chair, see January '22 Good Governance article ); critical and strategic thinkers; independent-minded; consensus-builders; and of unimpeachable integrity. We also suggested the nominations subcommittee prioritize diverse candidates and individuals with previous board experience and expertise in the financial realm. The nominations subcommittee selected five of the 18 candidates to interview, ultimately nominating three candidates who were later elected to the board. The subcommittee also launched an associate board member program. (At cues.org/boardpolicies , see package 1). This enabled bringing in a strong fourth candidate as an associate director, creating the opportunity to increase the candidate’s general knowledge of CU governance over time, while benefitting immediately from the candidate’s attributes and expertise. The Onboarding Process Not content with improving only the nominations process, Hudson Valley CU’s leadership also focused on enhancing its onboarding program for new volunteers. A small task force comprising both board and staff was created and led by an expert in training from the CU’s HR department. The task force expanded the CU’s original, skeletal onboarding process into a robust program that includes a 15-plus hour, four-session orientation curriculum with homework assignments and between-session learning. The program also includes a variety of training modalities and sources, including online modules from CUES; in-person presentations from staff and board members; and written materials. Beyond the orientation curriculum, Hudson Valley CU has committed to at least a 12-month onboarding process that includes regular check-ins by the board chair, committee assignments and access to the CEO, and management representatives who can provide tools, answer questions and serve as subject matter experts to help new directors understand the nuances of the CU industry, the CU’s budget, executive compensation and the economy, plus learn how their strategic decisions apply to and impact operations and results. Hudson Valley CU eventually aims to have all its volunteers and supervisory committee members participate in the onboarding process. The Human Dimensions of the Process We would be remiss if we didn’t address the challenges that such a significant amount of change raised. Implementing this multi-phase process was a massive undertaking for Hudson Valley CU’s board, supervisory committee and nominations subcommittee, and it represented a gap-leaping progression in the leaders’ ability to meet members’ needs. (For more, read, “ Key Outcomes and Lessons Learned From a Board Renewal Effort ”.) Successful organizational change involves more than good processes and procedures. People are the pivotal element, and enabling them to integrate new ways of thinking about and doing things is often the most challenging task. The starting point for change is recognizing that it’s needed. Implicitly, there must have been reasons, acknowledged or not, why any action hadn’t come sooner. The reasons change is hard and the right ways to contend with oppositional forces are unique to each situation. Still, Hudson Valley CU’s journey was not uncommon. Its particulars aside, we hope—as does the CU’s leadership—their story will be helpful for others contemplating similar enhancements. Board composition did shift over time at Hudson Valley CU, so a stagnated boardroom cohort was not the main board renewal problem the credit union faced. Rather, the board had not empowered the previous nominations subcommittee to function as a strategically important committee—recruiting the best candidates, helping to refresh the strategic makeup of the board and revitalizing its vision. While today the nominations committee is viewed by the board as one of its most consequential committees, it had been for years reduced to a group of people who executed the simple task of managing the logistics of the nominations process, with little to no strategic input or impact to the overall makeup of the board. Another consequence of that legacy was a contingent that strongly believed that maintaining the status quo was in the CU’s best interest. In their view, the introduction of innovative tools and processes to enhance Hudson Valley CU’s culture and governance posed a threat to the long-held assumption that the nominations process needed to be completely independent from the board and even management. Although the board had signed off on the innovations, some members of the nominations subcommittee concluded that the changes would be detrimental. “Some members of the committee were uncomfortable with the amount of dramatic change the consultants were looking to implement so quickly,” says CUES member Misty Decker, chair of the governance and nominations committee. In such a situation, building trust and giving the naturally conservative individuals the courage to try are what’s needed more than anything else. The antidote to resistance and anxiety-driven risk aversion is assurance, not force. Our approach was to mobilize a small group of institutional leaders—the board chair, the CEO, and the governance and nominations committee chair—to join us in a conversation with the nominations subcommittee members. We acknowledged that the proposed systemic changes were indeed a substantial and understandably frightening departure from the past. We heard their concerns, validating rather than dismissing their impassioned drive to guard normed cultural traditions, and we invited them to question and reconsider the benefits to change. “We were ultimately successful,” Decker adds, “because we had established trust in Quantum Governance’s experience addressing board issues with other credit unions and in Dolus Advisors’ expertise in driving organizational culture change.” Of course, the realities of dealing with stakeholder pushback are rarely straightforward. Navigating opposition can get hot and messy. Agreeing to disagree, building or re-establishing trust, and defining workable pathways to compromise can be arduous. But there is no more important work. And this work is and has been a powerful reminder that high-performing boards are a combination of capabilities and practices coupled with human dynamics and culture. Each of these areas entails differently defined tools and solutions to enhance or repair as well as to strengthen and elevate. They also require a healthy dose of humility to accept—and even celebrate—that the changes we embrace are actually only a work in progress. Alexander Stein, Ph.D . , is founder of Dolus Advisors , a consultancy that helps leaders address psychologically complex organizational challenges. Previous Next